From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com (out01.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.231]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.20198.1585162240610130683 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 11:50:40 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 166.70.13.231, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jHB6t-00034I-LN; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 12:50:39 -0600 Received: from mta5.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.69]) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jHB6q-0004Vo-4Y; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 12:50:39 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta5.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35D412804EC; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 12:50:35 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta5.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta5.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta5.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id g1rdclydu2AP; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 12:50:35 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.120] (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) by mta5.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 91D701280323; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 12:50:35 -0600 (MDT) To: devel@edk2.groups.io, lersek@redhat.com, jiewen.yao@intel.com, "Justen, Jordan L" , Ard Biesheuvel References: <74D8A39837DF1E4DA445A8C0B3885C503F972D18@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> From: "Rebecca Cran" Message-ID: <3a4105c5-6512-e19d-98a4-84d45002b2a6@bsdio.com> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 12:50:35 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-XM-SPF: eid=1jHB6q-0004Vo-4Y;;;mid=<3a4105c5-6512-e19d-98a4-84d45002b2a6@bsdio.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.13.69;;;frm=rebecca@bsdio.com;;;spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.69 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa01.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,TooManyTo_001,TooManyTo_002, TooManyTo_003,TooManyTo_004 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5106] * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.6 TooManyTo_003 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 4x (uncommon) * 0.5 TooManyTo_002 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 3x (uncommon) * 0.5 TooManyTo_004 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 5x (uncommon) * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa01 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1] [Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa01 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: *;devel@edk2.groups.io, lersek@redhat.com, jiewen.yao@intel.com, "Justen, Jordan L" , Ard Biesheuvel X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 3250 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.03 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 3.9 (0.1%), b_tie_ro: 2.7 (0.1%), parse: 0.73 (0.0%), extract_message_metadata: 2.9 (0.1%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.33 (0.0%), tests_pri_-1000: 2.0 (0.1%), tests_pri_-950: 1.11 (0.0%), tests_pri_-900: 0.85 (0.0%), tests_pri_-90: 92 (2.8%), check_bayes: 90 (2.8%), b_tokenize: 3.9 (0.1%), b_tok_get_all: 4.7 (0.1%), b_comp_prob: 1.23 (0.0%), b_tok_touch_all: 78 (2.4%), b_finish: 0.63 (0.0%), tests_pri_0: 3138 (96.6%), check_dkim_signature: 0.40 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 3009 (92.6%), poll_dns_idle: 3004 (92.4%), tests_pri_10: 1.73 (0.1%), tests_pri_500: 5 (0.2%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Adding Bhyve support into upstream EDK2 X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US On 3/24/20 6:04 PM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > Umm... :) This is way too large, I think. Oh, it definitely is! I've still got a couple of days of deduplication work to go I think: I've already removed lots of packages from under BhyvePkg that it can just use from OvmfPkg. Thanks, I wasn't sure if I should suggest making changes to files under OvmfPkg to support Bhyve. Since that's okay, there are some small changes I'd like to make, for example adding the Bhyve PCI IDs into PciHostBridgeLib. -- Rebecca Cran