From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, eric.dong@intel.com
Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>, Chandana Kumar <chandana.c.kumar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Restore IDT context for APs.
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 23:41:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c028212-e539-53bf-c883-bdbc518ff5fd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200422090111.423-1-eric.dong@intel.com>
Eric,
On 04/22/20 11:01, Dong, Eric wrote:
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2683
I don't know what patches I'm supposed to review now. You seem to have
sent 4 (four) versions of this patch set to the list, but you didn't
call them {v1, v2, v3, v4}; you called them {v1, v2, v2, v2}. I can only
work off of the dates/times at which you sent the paches.
To make the confusion worse:
- your third (v3?) posting says "0/2" in the cover letter, but I can
only see one patch below it.
- your last (v4?) posting (that I can see) doesn't even have a cover
letter.
(a) [edk2-devel] [PATCH 0/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Fix ASSERT in AP procedure.
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/57772
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 09:34:54 +0800
(b) [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Fix ASSERT in AP procedure
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/57786
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:45:56 +0800
(~7 hours after (a))
(c) [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Fix ASSERT in AP procedure
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/57791
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:52:51 +0800
(~7 minutes after (b))
(d) [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2 1/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Restore IDT context for APs.
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/57794
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 17:01:10 +0800
(~8 minutes after (c))
And your latest comment on the bugzilla ticket, at
<https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2683#c2>, seems to
indicate that (b) is what you consider the most up-to-date version. But
you send two versions ((c) and (d)) after that.
I think I won't review any of these patches now.
(I don't even know under which I should send this response.)
Thanks
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-22 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-22 9:01 [PATCH v2 1/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Restore IDT context for APs Dong, Eric
2020-04-22 9:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Avoid ApInitReconfig in PEI Dong, Eric
2020-04-22 11:23 ` Ni, Ray
2020-04-24 16:39 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2020-04-22 11:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Restore IDT context for APs Ni, Ray
2020-04-24 16:37 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2020-04-22 21:41 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2020-04-23 0:58 ` Dong, Eric
2020-04-24 16:37 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3c028212-e539-53bf-c883-bdbc518ff5fd@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox