From: "Lendacky, Thomas" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
To: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
gaoliming <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
"lersek@redhat.com" <lersek@redhat.com>,
"Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: 'Brijesh Singh' <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
"Liu, Zhiguang" <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>,
"Justen, Jordan L" <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
'Ard Biesheuvel' <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
Subject: Re: 回复: 回复: [edk2-devel] 回复: 回复: 回复: [PATCH v2 01/11] MdePkg, OvmfPkg: Clean up GHCB field offsets and save area
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2020 12:42:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c23f8c5-450b-321e-7a9c-c6754ab6900c@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR11MB1272C99D92D4F47C41F58A07FE160@CY4PR11MB1272.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 10/27/20 2:57 AM, Dong, Eric wrote:
> I agree with Laszlo, we need to care Bisectability first.
Thanks for responding, Eric. I'll submit v3 as previously submitted.
Thanks,
Tom
>
> Thanks,
> Eric
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Lendacky, Thomas
> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2020 12:34 AM
> To: gaoliming <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; devel@edk2.groups.io; lersek@redhat.com; Ni, Ray <ray.ni@intel.com>; Dong, Eric <eric.dong@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> Cc: 'Brijesh Singh' <brijesh.singh@amd.com>; Liu, Zhiguang <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>; Justen, Jordan L <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>; 'Ard Biesheuvel' <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
> Subject: Re: 回复: 回复: [edk2-devel] 回复: 回复: 回复: [PATCH v2 01/11] MdePkg, OvmfPkg: Clean up GHCB field offsets and save area
>
> On 10/22/20 9:57 PM, gaoliming wrote:
>> Laszlo:
>> I agree Bisectability is important. I want to consider the impact and balance the change. Now, this change will update UefiCpuPkg. I also want to collect the feedback from UefiCpuPkg maintainer: Ray and Eric.
>
> Ray/Eric,
>
> Any feedback on this question (specifically for patch #10 of this series, not this patch)? I'd also prefer to maintain bisectability and therefore submit the changes to the UefiCpuPkg and OvmfPkg in the same patch.
>
> Thanks,
> Tom
>
>>
>> Thanks
>> Liming
>>> -----邮件原件-----
>>> 发件人: bounce+27952+66536+4905953+8761045@groups.io
>>> <bounce+27952+66536+4905953+8761045@groups.io> 代表 Laszlo Ersek
>>> 发送时间: 2020年10月22日 21:13
>>> 收件人: gaoliming <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>; devel@edk2.groups.io;
>>> thomas.lendacky@amd.com
>>> 抄送: 'Brijesh Singh' <brijesh.singh@amd.com>; 'Michael D Kinney'
>>> <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; 'Zhiguang Liu'
>>> <zhiguang.liu@intel.com>; 'Jordan Justen' <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>; 'Ard Biesheuvel'
>>> <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
>>> 主题: Re: 回复: [edk2-devel] 回复: 回复: 回复: [PATCH v2 01/11] MdePkg,
>>> OvmfPkg: Clean up GHCB field offsets and save area
>>>
>>> On 10/22/20 03:25, gaoliming wrote:
>>>> Tom:
>>>> For the patch in UefiCpuPkg, this changes the library interface.
>>>> So, the
>>> consumer and producer code is required to be changed together. There
>>> is no good compatible way to do it. I still prefer to separate them
>>> for the different package. Although the first commit breaks the tree,
>>> your patch is the patch serial, they will be merged together. Its impact should be small.
>>>
>>> I really disagree here. Bisectability is way more important, in my
>>> opinion, than avoiding a multi-package patch.
>>>
>>> I agree we should avoid multi-package patches as much as we can --
>>> but not more than we can. Bisectability (= keeping the tree buildable
>>> at every commit) is very important, in my opinion.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Laszlo
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-28 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-16 16:09 [PATCH v2 00/11] SEV-ES guest support fixes and cleanup Lendacky, Thomas
2020-10-16 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] MdePkg, OvmfPkg: Clean up GHCB field offsets and save area Lendacky, Thomas
2020-10-19 1:41 ` 回复: " gaoliming
2020-10-19 12:50 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2020-10-19 20:17 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-10-19 20:48 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2020-10-19 20:42 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-10-20 1:08 ` 回复: " gaoliming
2020-10-20 8:31 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-10-20 13:10 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2020-10-21 0:54 ` 回复: " gaoliming
2020-10-21 21:54 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2020-10-22 1:25 ` 回复: [edk2-devel] " gaoliming
2020-10-22 13:12 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-10-23 2:57 ` 回复: " gaoliming
2020-10-26 16:34 ` Lendacky, Thomas
2020-10-27 7:57 ` Dong, Eric
2020-10-28 17:42 ` Lendacky, Thomas [this message]
2020-10-21 12:29 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-10-16 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] UefiCpuPkg/VmgExitLib: Add interfaces to set/read GHCB ValidBitmap bits Lendacky, Thomas
2020-10-19 20:46 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2020-10-16 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] OvmfPkg/VmgExitLib: Implement new VmgExitLib interfaces Lendacky, Thomas
2020-10-19 20:51 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2020-10-16 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] OvmfPkg/VmgExitLib: Set the SW exit fields when performing VMGEXIT Lendacky, Thomas
2020-10-19 20:53 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2020-10-16 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] OvmfPkg/VmgExitLib: Set the SwScratch valid bit for IOIO events Lendacky, Thomas
2020-10-19 20:54 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2020-10-16 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] OvmfPkg/VmgExitLib: Set the SwScratch valid bit for MMIO events Lendacky, Thomas
2020-10-16 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Set the SW exit fields when performing VMGEXIT Lendacky, Thomas
2020-10-16 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] OvmfPkg/QemuFlashFvbServicesRuntimeDxe: Set the SwScratch valid bit Lendacky, Thomas
2020-10-19 20:57 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2020-10-16 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] OvmfPkg/QemuFlashFvbServicesRuntimeDxe: Fix erase blocks for SEV-ES Lendacky, Thomas
2020-10-16 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] UefiCpuPkg, OvmfPkg: Disable interrupts when using the GHCB Lendacky, Thomas
2020-10-19 21:07 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2020-10-16 16:09 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: For SEV-ES guest, set stack based on processor number Lendacky, Thomas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3c23f8c5-450b-321e-7a9c-c6754ab6900c@amd.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox