From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::444; helo=mail-pf1-x444.google.com; envelope-from=ming.huang@linaro.org; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mail-pf1-x444.google.com (mail-pf1-x444.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::444]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51E64210D93CD for ; Sat, 4 Aug 2018 07:26:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x444.google.com with SMTP id j26-v6so4701960pfi.10 for ; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 07:26:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GDqA5XEX9PCUyr9nTXT2Bh4nVihNdMXkWjZqMnjIzqI=; b=QNh5L/IFcQIVckFqabd6ccOI7cKJss2cCDWS+kDiiH2kt3g6BbyW9XkHv9XB20WAl4 1I+8+p+X5wHcNXfOlg8NqpMiXYTtKODSwt5SsuIqJJGREChdSDzGg08Q5IFjax3q2AGB FZN1D5BmA5KZCf0UuxcGs7OdN+fgORmNTK1Rw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GDqA5XEX9PCUyr9nTXT2Bh4nVihNdMXkWjZqMnjIzqI=; b=kbDs1wSAWI+W4IKOoG5R/2YJ23QKnLF8yuAc2La9pNWadiLnAL5TODFtjMnNvFOkln 7LgKvDdplTGMX/15KnR6UAbdlezMXUUIQdBGEXA7Zeoyt78JOWVRSeROujjzV4qUqs6+ pIB4RCPfUl2LEc4XHR/IrX/YVIxxoPQ/Yb3Vw6QLeS46dWBhH/LFYZoG8loQdNcs1a4S 5+kNAm6bNTV0aiD1PlsJsyPq4RISZ77Y+vKXi8B6iRDRArNkG2Wfnn+ZsxgVrwykyGEu fJ3CRIM01Sm7obs0d+NjezQDAGBx5hdqwRktIYAwqAsWjaT5QAgihonLNtjs/qbA84qS vUcw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlEprKFg0AE1j+uhuQPSF7fXZrlEHJiUS/83rN0qF5+oIzgdDjr1 IDIln4pU5C0BUkT1Gee/6ub0AA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpfnAM9VDeBYosqBfX118OIQh4RnOvoUMSeSkqqKIKWuvwA7aIfpjxO+3BvNz83vznCZnUYSYg== X-Received: by 2002:a63:d401:: with SMTP id a1-v6mr7785092pgh.414.1533392774804; Sat, 04 Aug 2018 07:26:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.95.1.166] ([64.64.108.93]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w5-v6sm10637060pfn.44.2018.08.04.07.26.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 04 Aug 2018 07:26:14 -0700 (PDT) To: Leif Lindholm Cc: linaro-uefi@lists.linaro.org, edk2-devel@lists.01.org, graeme.gregory@linaro.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, guoheyi@huawei.com, wanghuiqiang@huawei.com, huangming23@huawei.com, zhangjinsong2@huawei.com, huangdaode@hisilicon.com, john.garry@huawei.com, xinliang.liu@linaro.org References: <20180724070922.63362-1-ming.huang@linaro.org> <20180801215640.5o364hnk2qd4diwn@bivouac.eciton.net> <20180802101256.u4v6r7ubvsgtp7sl@bivouac.eciton.net> From: Ming Message-ID: <3d1953e6-23fb-8e1a-504d-f8614edd8207@linaro.org> Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2018 22:26:00 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180802101256.u4v6r7ubvsgtp7sl@bivouac.eciton.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH edk2-platforms v1 00/38] Upload for D06 platform X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2018 14:26:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit ÔÚ 8/2/2018 6:12 PM, Leif Lindholm дµÀ: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 09:46:13AM +0800, Ming wrote: >> I am sorry for the first issue, the modify FIRMWARE_VER patch is add >> alone just befor send out the patchset. >> >> For generating acpi table, I use acpica-tools 20180508 version and it works. >> I think acpica-tools are not backward compatibility and confused about acpica-tools. > > Yes, it's a real pain. We used to have lots of issues with this, but > the last couple of years have been less bad. > Some platforms moved from .asl to .aslc to get around this. > > I can confirm using 20180508 version resolves this issue. > And that 20180629 does not work :( > Unfortunately that won't currently work with our AMD overdrive > platforms. But we'll have to live with that for now. > > However, I notice the D02 build is now broken, due to the removal of > Silicon/Hisilicon/Drivers/PciHostBridgeDxe. I guess this is not a huge > issue, and maybe it is time to retire that platform anyway. > If so, could you create a set removing D02 and the bits only used by > it? > > / > Leif > Yes, D02 is not need to maintain now. I will send the removing patch set later. Ming