public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Michael Brown <mcb30@ipxe.org>, devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianocore@kernel.org>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@google.com>,
	Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
	James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
	Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
	Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>, Oliver Steffen <osteffen@redhat.com>,
	Sebastien Boeuf <sebastien.boeuf@intel.com>,
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] OvmfPkg/PlatformInitLib: catch QEMU's CPU hotplug reg block regression
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 14:22:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <407c5cee-7a6c-cbc8-35cc-8f2c2724914c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01020185a568604c-e16d8581-963a-4ff3-8566-bf0640ad327d-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com>

On 1/12/23 10:55, Michael Brown wrote:
> On 12/01/2023 08:28, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> In QEMU v5.1.0, the CPU hotplug register block misbehaves: the
>> negotiation
>> protocol is (effectively) broken such that it suggests that switching
>> from
>> the legacy interface to the modern interface works, but in reality the
>> switch never happens. The symptom has been witnessed when using TCG
>> acceleration; KVM seems to mask the issue. The issue persists with the
>> following (latest) stable QEMU releases: v5.2.0, v6.2.0, v7.2.0.
>> Currently
>> there is no stable release that addresses the problem.
>>
>> The QEMU bug confuses the Present and Possible counting in function
>> PlatformMaxCpuCountInitialization(), in
>> "OvmfPkg/Library/PlatformInitLib/Platform.c". OVMF ends up with Present=0
>> Possible=1. This in turn further confuses MpInitLib in UefiCpuPkg (hence
>> firmware-time multiprocessing will be broken). Worse, CPU hot(un)plug
>> with
>> SMI will be summarily broken in OvmfPkg/CpuHotplugSmm, which (considering
>> the privilege level of SMM) is not that great.
>>
>> Detect the issue in PlatformMaxCpuCountInitialization(), and print an
>> error message and *hang* if the issue is present.
> 
> Would this mean that OVMF would refuse to start with all current distro
> versions of qemu (when not using KVM), or am I misunderstanding?

Your understanding is correct.

I'm not in a rush to get this merged, but eventually, it should be.

On qemu-devel, I asked for the fix to be applied to all stable branches
starting with v5.*. I'm not sure how far "back" qemu-stable is
maintained though.

Laszlo


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-12 13:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-12  8:28 [PATCH v2] OvmfPkg/PlatformInitLib: catch QEMU's CPU hotplug reg block regression Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-12  9:55 ` [edk2-devel] " Michael Brown
2023-01-12 10:09   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-12 13:31     ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-12 13:22   ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2023-01-12 16:08     ` Michael Brown
2023-01-12 17:58       ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-12 18:22         ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-12 22:49           ` Michael Brown
2023-01-13  6:03         ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-13  9:32           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-13 10:10             ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-13 12:22               ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-16 14:42                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-16 14:48                 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-17 12:37                   ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-17 16:43                     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-18  7:25                       ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-18 11:50                         ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-18 13:10                           ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-01-18 13:25                             ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-18 13:10                           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-01-18 13:21                             ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-01-12 18:34 ` Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=407c5cee-7a6c-cbc8-35cc-8f2c2724914c@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox