public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>,
	Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
	Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>,
	afish@apple.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] MdePkg/Misc: Move ARM* BaseMemoryLibStm to MdePkg
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 21:24:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <419d4168-aae8-f93e-dbf4-059a4b60ac3c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160902191826.GH4715@bivouac.eciton.net>

On 09/02/16 21:18, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 07:45:26PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I agree that fixing the branch now would be nice. I just don't
>>>> understand why fixing BaseMemoryLibStm in place is not a better
>>>> solution, especially if we are nuking it anyway next week. That way,
>>>> we have to change all the platforms only a single time.
>>>
>>> Mainly because we don't _know_ that it will be resolved next week and
>>> I'm currently having some trust issues regarding these libraries.
>>>
>>> If that's what it takes to get consensus, sure, I'll go along with
>>> that. I'm fully aware I'm being slightly irrational here.
>>>
>>> So where to now? Just push 2-3 from Wednesday?
>>
>> Yes, please. On Monday, I will look into adding Arm support to the
>> optdxe flavor, and once that is in, we can move all platforms over
>> and deprecate/remove the stm version.
> 
> Allright - now pushed.
> 
> Mike, Andrew, apologies for the noise, and thank you for very quick
> feedback.

Thanks everyone!

Laszlo



  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-02 19:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-02 14:29 [PATCH 0/3] MdePkg/Misc: fix Arm BaseMemoryLib Leif Lindholm
2016-09-02 14:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] MdePkg/Misc: Move ARM* BaseMemoryLibStm to MdePkg Leif Lindholm
2016-09-02 15:02   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-09-02 15:23     ` Leif Lindholm
2016-09-02 16:07       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-09-02 18:05         ` Leif Lindholm
2016-09-02 18:11           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-09-02 18:32             ` Leif Lindholm
2016-09-02 18:45               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-09-02 19:18                 ` Leif Lindholm
2016-09-02 19:24                   ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2016-09-02 14:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] MdePkg/BaseMemoryLibStm: implement new IsZeroGuid() API function Leif Lindholm
2016-09-02 14:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] MdePkg/BaseMemoryLibStm: implement new IsZeroBuffer() " Leif Lindholm
2016-09-02 14:48 ` [PATCH 0/3] MdePkg/Misc: fix Arm BaseMemoryLib Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-02 14:53   ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-09-02 16:02     ` Leif Lindholm
2016-09-02 15:49 ` Kinney, Michael D
2016-09-02 15:57   ` Leif Lindholm
2016-09-02 15:59     ` Andrew Fish

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=419d4168-aae8-f93e-dbf4-059a4b60ac3c@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox