From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D8F81A1E08 for ; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:24:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8765E6DD8A; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 19:24:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-116-76.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.116.76]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u82JOluV019080; Fri, 2 Sep 2016 15:24:48 -0400 To: Leif Lindholm , Ard Biesheuvel References: <20160902142912.17297-1-leif.lindholm@linaro.org> <20160902142912.17297-2-leif.lindholm@linaro.org> <6C8DC7F6-2459-4CD6-A556-3B17A1FBBF5F@linaro.org> <20160902152351.GB4715@bivouac.eciton.net> <20160902180513.GE4715@bivouac.eciton.net> <20160902183215.GG4715@bivouac.eciton.net> <8A4AB213-88D8-4408-9299-3B2AE4B339F9@linaro.org> <20160902191826.GH4715@bivouac.eciton.net> Cc: edk2-devel-01 , Michael D Kinney , Liming Gao , afish@apple.com From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: <419d4168-aae8-f93e-dbf4-059a4b60ac3c@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2016 21:24:47 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160902191826.GH4715@bivouac.eciton.net> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 10.5.11.23 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Fri, 02 Sep 2016 19:24:49 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] MdePkg/Misc: Move ARM* BaseMemoryLibStm to MdePkg X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2016 19:24:50 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 09/02/16 21:18, Leif Lindholm wrote: > On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 07:45:26PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >>>> >>>> I agree that fixing the branch now would be nice. I just don't >>>> understand why fixing BaseMemoryLibStm in place is not a better >>>> solution, especially if we are nuking it anyway next week. That way, >>>> we have to change all the platforms only a single time. >>> >>> Mainly because we don't _know_ that it will be resolved next week and >>> I'm currently having some trust issues regarding these libraries. >>> >>> If that's what it takes to get consensus, sure, I'll go along with >>> that. I'm fully aware I'm being slightly irrational here. >>> >>> So where to now? Just push 2-3 from Wednesday? >> >> Yes, please. On Monday, I will look into adding Arm support to the >> optdxe flavor, and once that is in, we can move all platforms over >> and deprecate/remove the stm version. > > Allright - now pushed. > > Mike, Andrew, apologies for the noise, and thank you for very quick > feedback. Thanks everyone! Laszlo