From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.132.183.28; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=lersek@redhat.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33A09211799FB for ; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 05:04:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0CE790C78; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 12:04:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-120-50.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.120.50]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F2765D995; Wed, 17 Oct 2018 12:04:01 +0000 (UTC) To: Leif Lindholm , Eric Jin Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org, Jiaxin Wu References: <20181013151936.15784-1-eric.jin@intel.com> <20181016022826.kj63jctabgoxcf2h@bivouac.eciton.net> From: Laszlo Ersek Message-ID: <41ea021e-c68b-a875-9c70-670699c98d28@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 14:04:01 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181016022826.kj63jctabgoxcf2h@bivouac.eciton.net> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.29]); Wed, 17 Oct 2018 12:04:03 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH] uefi-sct/SctPkg:Add conformance test cases for deprecated EFI_VARIABLE_AUTHENTICATED_WRITE_ACCESS attribute. X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2018 12:04:04 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Leif, On 10/16/18 04:28, Leif Lindholm wrote: > Laszlo: a few years ago, you also posted a _really_ useful email about > the process of being a maintainer, and helpful workflows (like "sort > emails to review immediately on reception, even if you don't have time > to review now"). I have since failed to find it in my history (or via > google). Since you're very organised - do you have it lying around, > and if so would you be able to re-post it? I'm sure I still have the email, if I sent it; however, I can't find it now, because I don't personally remember the *specific* email you refer to, and so I can't come up with good search terms, for the program that indexes my mailbox ("recoll"). Anyway, what I generally do is: - I maintain a set of tagged emails that present work items. This set (of emails) exists in addition to bugzillas that are assigned to me. - I process emails in batches. I sync my mailbox, and then turn off synching, until I have covered everything possible, at that point, that relate to my mailbox. - In every new batch in my INBOX, I go over the emails as quickly as possible, trying to triage emails as I go. If I can take care of an email immediately, I do. If it needs more work (especially focused work), then I tag the email, and archive it at once. If the tagged email is private (not on any list), then I'll let it sit tagged in my personal archive folder. If the email is also on some list, then I might choose to tag the email in that folder instead, and archive the personal copy without tagging it. - I go over all the new emails in my list folders as well (i.e. emails that I'm not personally CC'd on). Dependent on list, I dedicate different amounts of attention. - Once I'm done triaging / tagging the new batch (and therefore I have no unread messages in my entire mailbox), I search my mailbox for all tagged messages. I usually list those hits in chronological order, but not always (e.g., sometimes I group them by containing folder). I work my way through these items slowly. Importantly, I shut out interruptions while I do this -- no more email synching, no phone, no IRC. And the FIFO processing order of the tagged messages mostly ensures good responsiveness from my side, despite this process being quite OK at throughput as well. (Your present email fell in the "take care of it at once" category :) ) Thanks, Laszlo