From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: None (no SPF record) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=192.55.52.88; helo=mga01.intel.com; envelope-from=stephano.cetola@linux.intel.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89E97211D675B for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:20:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Mar 2019 15:20:20 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.58,468,1544515200"; d="scan'208";a="154090987" Received: from scetola-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.251.138.45]) ([10.251.138.45]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Mar 2019 15:20:20 -0700 To: Rebecca Cran References: <3dd639e4-2ff8-f8f1-a10d-8b4059169e25@bluestop.org> Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" From: stephano Message-ID: <4425e69d-72d9-eb1b-85eb-21c1f11c431d@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:20:20 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3dd639e4-2ff8-f8f1-a10d-8b4059169e25@bluestop.org> Subject: Re: [edk2-announce] March Community Meeting Minutes X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:20:21 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 3/11/2019 1:55 PM, Rebecca Cran wrote: > You can't see without following the pull request *who* committed the > change.  There are almost 1000 open pull requests, which is something we > probably want to try and avoid. They also seem to have _lots_ of labels. > I wonder if there's a cleaner way of handling them? Agreed. We spoke about some of the downsides of pull requests in the last stewards meeting. Linus did a fair job of detailing some of these here: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/pull/17 I'm going to work with EDK II maintainers to be sure that we do not move to a model that makes their life harder (e.g. 1000 open pull requests). > > > Also, about groups.io, I wonder if I might want to investigate their > support for using our own domain, so people don't have to remember that > the mailing list and documents are on groups.io and not tianocore.org? > Yes, I'm hoping to use our own domain with groups.io. Once we've completed the testing phase I'll bring this up to my boss(es) to get approval for an enterprise account ($200/month). That will allow us to use something more friendly with tianocore.org. Cheers, Stephano