public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@arm.com>, edk2-devel@ml01.01.org
Cc: nd@arm.com, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ArmVirtPkg: Drop the nonsense ASSERT() statement
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:50:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4612efdd-ec42-6a85-5f56-971c87f54c6d@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476694491-29933-1-git-send-email-dennis.chen@arm.com>

On 10/17/16 10:54, Dennis Chen wrote:
> Since All the GIC base address variables now are 64-bit, given
> that a UNIT64 var cannot exceed MAX_UNIT64, it doesn't make sense
> to continue keep them in the codes, so this patch just simply drop
> those ASSERT() statements as it should be.
> 
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@arm.com>
> ---
>  ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c | 4 ----
>  1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
> index 64afc4d..7a312e5 100644
> --- a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
> +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/ArmVirtGicArchLib/ArmVirtGicArchLib.c
> @@ -79,11 +79,9 @@ ArmVirtGicArchLibConstructor (
>  
>      // RegProp[0..1] == { GICD base, GICD size }
>      DistBase = SwapBytes64 (Reg[0]);
> -    ASSERT (DistBase < MAX_UINT32);
>  
>      // RegProp[2..3] == { GICR base, GICR size }
>      RedistBase = SwapBytes64 (Reg[2]);
> -    ASSERT (RedistBase < MAX_UINT32);
>  
>      PcdSet64 (PcdGicDistributorBase, DistBase);
>      PcdSet64 (PcdGicRedistributorsBase, RedistBase);
> @@ -117,8 +115,6 @@ ArmVirtGicArchLibConstructor (
>  
>      DistBase = SwapBytes64 (Reg[0]);
>      CpuBase  = SwapBytes64 (Reg[2]);
> -    ASSERT (DistBase < MAX_UINT32);
> -    ASSERT (CpuBase < MAX_UINT32);
>  
>      PcdSet64 (PcdGicDistributorBase, DistBase);
>      PcdSet64 (PcdGicInterruptInterfaceBase, CpuBase);
> 

Is this a continuation of your

commit 8a1f2378d74390ddfe35c70f68e0c8b03bf84089
Author: Dennis Chen <dennis.chen@arm.com>
Date:   Mon Sep 5 19:38:20 2016 +0800

    ArmPkg ArmPlatformPkg ArmVirtPkg: ARM GICv2/v3 Base Address width fix-up

?

I think I'll let Ard review this one. :)

Thanks
Laszlo


      reply	other threads:[~2016-10-17  9:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-17  8:54 [PATCH] ArmVirtPkg: Drop the nonsense ASSERT() statement Dennis Chen
2016-10-17  9:50 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4612efdd-ec42-6a85-5f56-971c87f54c6d@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox