From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>, devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 4/4] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: fix MTRR for low-RAM sizes that have many bits clear
Date: Wed, 8 May 2019 11:10:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4680d4c5-6028-dee6-10d4-023289bf4dc8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46dccf0d-6ab6-11e6-d473-187cf8ce7114@redhat.com>
Hi Phil,
On 05/08/19 09:33, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 5/4/19 2:07 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> Assume that we boot OVMF in a QEMU guest with 1025 MB of RAM. The
>> following assertion will fire:
>>
>>> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status = Out of Resources)
>>> ASSERT OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/MemDetect.c(696): !EFI_ERROR (Status)
>>
>> That's because the range [1025 MB, 4 GB) that we try to mark as
>> uncacheable with MTRRs has size 3071 MB:
>>
>> 0x1_0000_0000
>> -0x0_4010_0000
>> --------------
>> 0x0_BFF0_0000
>>
>> The integer that stands for the uncacheable area size has 11 (eleven) bits
>> set to 1. As a result, covering this size requires 11 variable MTRRs (each
>> MTRR must cover a naturally aligned, power-of-two sized area). But, if we
>> need more variable MTRRs than the CPU can muster (such as 8), then
>> MtrrSetMemoryAttribute() fails, and we refuse to continue booting (which
>> is justified, in itself).
>>
>> Unfortunately, this is not difficult to trigger, and the error message is
>> well-hidden from end-users, in the OVMF debug log. The following
>> mitigation is inspired by SeaBIOS:
>>
>> Truncate the uncacheable area size to a power-of-two, while keeping the
>> end fixed at 4 GB. Such an interval can be covered by just one variable
>> MTRR.
>>
>> This may leave such an MMIO gap, between the end of low-RAM and the start
>> of the uncacheable area, that is marked as WB (through the MTRR default).
>> Raise the base of the 32-bit PCI MMIO aperture accordingly -- the gap will
>> not be used for anything.
>
> I had to draw it to be sure I understood correctly:
>
> +-------------+ +-------------+ <-- 4GB
> | | | |
> | | | |
> | | | PCI MMIO |
> | | | |
> | | | uncacheable |
> | uncacheable | | |
> | | | |
> | | ----> +-------------+ <-- mQemuUc32Base
> | | | | | (pow2 aligned)
> | | | | GAP |
> | | | | (cacheable) |
> +-------------+ ---- +-------------+ <-- TopOfLowRam
> | | | | (not pow2 aligned)
> | | | |
> | | | |
> | | | |
> | LowerMemory | | LowerMemory |
> | (cacheable) | | (cacheable) |
> | | | |
> | | | |
> | | | |
> +-------------+ +-------------+
Correct. "mQemuUc32Base" is not itself a whole power of two, but it is
pow2 aligned, where the alignment must not be smaller than "size" *is*.
This natural alignment is ensured because 4GB is itself a power of two
(2^32). Thus, if "size" is 2^m, then
mQemuUc32Base == (4GB - size) == (2^32 - 2^m) == 2^m * (2^(32-m) - 1)
and that is divisible by 2^m. (We know for sure that (m < 32).)
Therefore the natural alignment for the base is satisfied.
For example, consider base=3GB, size=1GB. Then m=30.
>
>> On Q35, the minimal 32-bit PCI MMIO aperture (triggered by RAM size 2815
>> MB) shrinks from
>>
>> 0xE000_0000 - 0xAFF0_0000 = 769 MB
>>
>> to
>>
>> 0xE000_0000 - 0xC000_0000 = 512 MB
>>
>> On i440fx, the minimal 32-bit PCI MMIO aperture (triggered by RAM size
>> 3583 MB) shrinks from
>>
>> 0xFC00_0000 - 0xDFF0_0000 = 449 MB
>>
>> to
>>
>> 0xFC00_0000 - 0xE000_0000 = 448 MB
>>
>> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
>> Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666941
>> Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701710
>> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/Platform.h | 2 ++
>> OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/MemDetect.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++---
>> OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/Platform.c | 4 +---
>> 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/Platform.h b/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/Platform.h
>> index 81af8b71480f..4476ddd871cd 100644
>> --- a/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/Platform.h
>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/Platform.h
>> @@ -114,4 +114,6 @@ extern UINT32 mMaxCpuCount;
>>
>> extern UINT16 mHostBridgeDevId;
>>
>> +extern UINT32 mQemuUc32Base;
>> +
>> #endif // _PLATFORM_PEI_H_INCLUDED_
>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/MemDetect.c b/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/MemDetect.c
>> index e890e36408a6..ae73c63d27d5 100644
>> --- a/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/MemDetect.c
>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/MemDetect.c
>> @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ STATIC UINT32 mS3AcpiReservedMemorySize;
>>
>> STATIC UINT16 mQ35TsegMbytes;
>>
>> +UINT32 mQemuUc32Base;
>> +
>> VOID
>> Q35TsegMbytesInitialization (
>> VOID
>> @@ -663,6 +665,8 @@ QemuInitializeRam (
>> // cover it exactly.
>> //
>> if (IsMtrrSupported ()) {
>> + UINT32 Uc32Size;
>> +
>> MtrrGetAllMtrrs (&MtrrSettings);
>>
>> //
>> @@ -689,11 +693,24 @@ QemuInitializeRam (
>>
>> //
>> // Set memory range from the "top of lower RAM" (RAM below 4GB) to 4GB as
>> - // uncacheable
>> + // uncacheable. Make sure one variable MTRR suffices by truncating the size
>> + // to a whole power of two. This will round the base *up*, and a gap (not
>> + // used for either RAM or MMIO) may stay in the middle, marked as
>> + // cacheable-by-default.
>> //
>> - Status = MtrrSetMemoryAttribute (LowerMemorySize,
>> - SIZE_4GB - LowerMemorySize, CacheUncacheable);
>> + Uc32Size = GetPowerOfTwo32 ((UINT32)(SIZE_4GB - LowerMemorySize));
>> + mQemuUc32Base = (UINT32)(SIZE_4GB - Uc32Size);
>> + if (mQemuUc32Base != LowerMemorySize) {
>> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_VERBOSE, "%a: rounded UC32 base from 0x%x up to 0x%x, for "
>> + "an UC32 size of 0x%x\n", __FUNCTION__, (UINT32)LowerMemorySize,
>> + mQemuUc32Base, Uc32Size));
>> + }
>> +
>> + Status = MtrrSetMemoryAttribute (mQemuUc32Base, Uc32Size,
>> + CacheUncacheable);
>> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
>> + } else {
>> + mQemuUc32Base = (UINT32)LowerMemorySize;
>> }
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/Platform.c b/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/Platform.c
>> index fd8eccaf3e50..c064b4ed9b8f 100644
>> --- a/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/Platform.c
>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/Platform.c
>> @@ -174,14 +174,12 @@ MemMapInitialization (
>> AddIoMemoryRangeHob (0x0A0000, BASE_1MB);
>>
>> if (!mXen) {
>> - UINT32 TopOfLowRam;
>> UINT64 PciExBarBase;
>> UINT32 PciBase;
>> UINT32 PciSize;
>>
>> - TopOfLowRam = GetSystemMemorySizeBelow4gb ();
>> PciExBarBase = 0;
>> - PciBase = (TopOfLowRam < BASE_2GB) ? BASE_2GB : TopOfLowRam;
>> + PciBase = (mQemuUc32Base < BASE_2GB) ? BASE_2GB : mQemuUc32Base;
>> if (mHostBridgeDevId == INTEL_Q35_MCH_DEVICE_ID) {
>> //
>> // The 32-bit PCI host aperture is expected to fall between the top of
>>
>
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daude <philmd@redhat.com>
>
Thank you!
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-08 9:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-04 0:07 [PATCH 0/4] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: fix two assertion failures with weird RAM sizes Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-04 0:07 ` [PATCH 1/4] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: assign PciSize on both i440fx/q35 branches explicitly Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-06 11:06 ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-06 12:04 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-16 7:52 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-05-04 0:07 ` [PATCH 2/4] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: hoist PciBase assignment above the i440fx/q35 branching Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-06 11:08 ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-16 7:53 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-05-04 0:07 ` [PATCH 3/4] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: reorder the 32-bit PCI hole vs. the PCIEXBAR on q35 Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-16 8:00 ` [edk2-devel] " Ard Biesheuvel
2019-05-16 12:18 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-16 12:24 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-16 19:15 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-04 0:07 ` [PATCH 4/4] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: fix MTRR for low-RAM sizes that have many bits clear Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-08 7:33 ` [edk2-devel] " Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2019-05-08 9:10 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2019-05-16 8:05 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2019-05-15 10:36 ` [edk2-devel] [PATCH 0/4] OvmfPkg/PlatformPei: fix two assertion failures with weird RAM sizes Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-15 11:56 ` Leif Lindholm
2019-05-15 12:44 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-05-15 16:42 ` Michael D Kinney
2019-05-16 19:33 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4680d4c5-6028-dee6-10d4-023289bf4dc8@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox