From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com (out02.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.232]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.1001.1584754433905609076 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 18:33:54 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 166.70.13.232, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jFT1M-0004L9-RK for devel@edk2.groups.io; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 19:33:52 -0600 Received: from mta4.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.68]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1jFT1L-0003Ok-W5 for devel@edk2.groups.io; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 19:33:52 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta4.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA6A1500880 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 19:33:51 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta4.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta4.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta4.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id aLGEC-7TDmr2 for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 19:33:51 -0600 (MDT) Received: from photon.int.bluestop.org (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) by mta4.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A20250076F for ; Fri, 20 Mar 2020 19:33:51 -0600 (MDT) To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" From: "Rebecca Cran" Message-ID: <46ad7e58-edb7-0819-9542-8d6850598292@bsdio.com> Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 19:33:50 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-XM-SPF: eid=1jFT1L-0003Ok-W5;;;mid=<46ad7e58-edb7-0819-9542-8d6850598292@bsdio.com>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.13.68;;;frm=rebecca@bsdio.com;;;spf=pass X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.68 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa07.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,TooManyTo_001 autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5732] * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa07 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1] [Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa07 1397; IP=ok Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;"devel@edk2.groups.io" X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 413 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.07 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 11 (2.7%), b_tie_ro: 10 (2.3%), parse: 0.92 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 13 (3.2%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.80 (0.2%), tests_pri_-1000: 4.1 (1.0%), tests_pri_-950: 1.32 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 0.96 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 65 (15.7%), check_bayes: 63 (15.3%), b_tokenize: 4.3 (1.0%), b_tok_get_all: 3.9 (0.9%), b_comp_prob: 1.70 (0.4%), b_tok_touch_all: 50 (12.2%), b_finish: 0.99 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 303 (73.3%), check_dkim_signature: 0.51 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 183 (44.4%), poll_dns_idle: 179 (43.4%), tests_pri_10: 3.0 (0.7%), tests_pri_500: 8 (1.9%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Information about the VMs used to do EDK2 CI? X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US I was wondering if it might be possible to get information about the VMs used to run EDK2 CI? For example I noticed the Edk2ToolsBuild.py script doesn't try and build BaseTools in parallel, causing it to take 45 seconds - whereas it takes around 10 when run with "make -j4" and 6 with "make -j16". However, without knowing the specifications of the VMs used, I'm not sure if I should work on optimizing things like that to run better. -- Rebecca Cran