BTW did you consider to remove this Private->Uri someday at all ?
I tried to remove it, but since it declared in a common header for all redfish client feature drivers
those changes was huge comparing to a small memory leak I tried to fix.
And now such pattern spreads into new feature drivers.
In short: there is no need to cache this value in Private->Uri, but pass it as an argument down to stack in EDKII_REDFISH_RESOURCE_CONFIG_PROTOCOL implementation.
I think it just small design flaw.
The code I'm talking about:
+ //
+ // Check and see if "@Redfish.Settings" exist or not.
+ //
+ ZeroMem (&PendingSettingResponse, sizeof (REDFISH_RESPONSE));
+ Status = GetPendingSettings (
+ Private->RedfishService,
+ Response.Payload,
+ &PendingSettingResponse,
+ &PendingSettingUri
+ );
+ if (!EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
+ DEBUG ((REDFISH_DEBUG_TRACE, "%a: @Redfish.Settings found: %s\n", __func__, PendingSettingUri));
+ Private->Uri = PendingSettingUri;
+ ExpectedResponse = &PendingSettingResponse;
+ } else {
+ DEBUG ((REDFISH_DEBUG_TRACE, "%a: No @Redfish.Settings is found\n", __func__));
+ Private->Uri = Uri;
+ ExpectedResponse = &Response;
+ }
In this pattern PendingSettingUri is leaked, since Private->Uri belongs to caller and never released.
But... in fact it is not true for Feature/Bios driver, and actually leaked resource is original Private->Uri string.
This is because these EDKII_REDFISH_RESOURCE_CONFIG_PROTOCOL function called by
HandleResource() function, which in turns called from here:
//
// Initialize collection path
//
Private->Uri = RedfishGetUri (ResourceUri);
if (Private->Uri == NULL) {
ASSERT (FALSE);
FreePool (ResourceUri);
return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
}
Status = HandleResource (Private, Private->Uri);
if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a, process external resource: %a failed: %r\n", __func__, Private->Uri, Status));
}
FreePool (Private->Uri);
Too many "Private->Uri" with a different value.
PS: Funny, just pay attention to the log trace above - %a used for Private->Uri. Probably it was one of the factors
induced me to write previous message :)
Regards,
Mike.
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
It is no problem. 😊 Thank you Mike for looking into this patch.
Abner
-----Original Message-----
From: M M <mike.maslenkin@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2024 10:11 PM
To: Chang, Abner <Abner.Chang@amd.com>
Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io; Nickle Wang <nicklew@nvidia.com>; Igor
Kulchytskyy <igork@ami.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-redfish-client][PATCH V2]
RedfishClientPkg/FeatureDriver: ComputerSystem_1_13_0 driver
Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution
when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
You are right.
Sorry for the noise!
No problems here.
I mixed up with tags in my editor while looked into patch.
Regards,
Mike
On 26. 1. 2024., at 17:03, Chang, Abner <Abner.Chang@amd.com> wrote:
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
Hi Mike,
I can't identify the issue on %s as Private->Uri is defined as EFI_STRING, or I
miss something?
Thanks
Abner
-----Original Message-----
From: M M <mike.maslenkin@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2024 9:55 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Nickle Wang <nicklew@nvidia.com>
Cc: Chang, Abner <Abner.Chang@amd.com>; Igor Kulchytskyy
<igork@ami.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-redfish-client][PATCH V2]
RedfishClientPkg/FeatureDriver: ComputerSystem_1_13_0 driver
Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper
caution
when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
Hi Abner,
On 26. 1. 2024., at 05:20, Nickle Wang via groups.io
<nicklew=nvidia.com@groups.io> wrote:
Hi Abner,
Same minor issue as 1_5_0. Please add "%a:" to below DEBUG call.
+ DEBUG ((DEBUG_MANAGEABILITY, " No platform Redfish
ConfigureLang
found for %s\n", __func__, Private->Uri));
Regards,
Nickle
There are two issues in this string. The second one is incorrect %s format
used
for Private->Uri.
This issue exists in V3 not only in the line mentioned above.
Regards,
Mike.