In that case, I’d like to move the proposed name to BoardSupportPkg.
Thanks,
Michael
Michael:
I am OK for both name. I think they have same meaning. To avoid the common word in Package name, such as Generic or Universal, BoardSupportPkg
name may be better.
Thanks
Liming
From: Kubacki, Michael A [mailto:michael.a.kubacki@intel.com]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2019 1:30 PM
To: Gao; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>;
devel@edk2.groups.io
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [RFC][edk2-platform][Add new packages in Platform\Intel directory]
Hi Liming,
I agree with the need for both packages. We should wait at least another day for any additional feedback on the package name GenericBoardPkg. That name may give the impression the package can
generically be used on various boards whereas the intent here is a package containing common or supporting board functionality. An alternative name to consider is BoardSupportPkg.
As a reminder, ensure the separation of content follows 8.1 (or update the document if necessary):
Thanks,
Michael