From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: None (no SPF record) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=192.55.52.115; helo=mga14.intel.com; envelope-from=stephano.cetola@linux.intel.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3A122117FD70 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2018 06:44:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Oct 2018 06:44:06 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.54,428,1534834800"; d="scan'208";a="95241224" Received: from amiszka-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.252.24.166]) ([10.252.24.166]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Oct 2018 06:44:05 -0700 To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org References: <829e38d9-c679-8b16-f8e7-06e953bc88f4@linux.intel.com> From: stephano Message-ID: <49cfb283-8947-da67-c514-b5fec619eefe@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 14:44:01 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <829e38d9-c679-8b16-f8e7-06e953bc88f4@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: Community Meeting Minutes #2 X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 13:44:07 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/26/2018 9:46 AM, stephano wrote> Standard C Types > ---------------- > ...We should have a code standard in > place to require the use of one or the other, but not both. I should be more clear here. When editing code, one should follow the pattern currently being used. E.g. If EDK2 types are used the developer should not mix in standard C types. If committing new code, like developing a new module, the developer should pick one of the two and stick with it. That is how I interpreted the discussion but please feel free to comment here if I misunderstood.