From: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
To: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 1/2] MdeModulePkg SmmIpl: Fill Smram range for SMM driver when LMFA enable
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 01:48:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14D69F002@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <228150f0-f389-b2bc-df5e-e97c42b6ab42@intel.com>
Agree. Thanks!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zeng, Star
> Sent: Friday, December 09, 2016 6:20 PM
> To: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Yao, Jiewen <jiewen.yao@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [Patch 1/2] MdeModulePkg SmmIpl: Fill Smram range for
> SMM driver when LMFA enable
>
> Liming,
>
> A small comment added inline.
> With that update, Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com> to this
> patch series.
>
> On 2016/12/1 14:49, Liming Gao wrote:
> > Allocate the additional Smram range to describe the reserved smram for
> > SMM core and driver when LMFA feature is enabled.
> >
> > Cc: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
> > Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> > Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
> > ---
> > MdeModulePkg/Core/PiSmmCore/PiSmmIpl.c | 39
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/PiSmmCore/PiSmmIpl.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Core/PiSmmCore/PiSmmIpl.c
> > index 18bec84..fd7027d 100644
> > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/PiSmmCore/PiSmmIpl.c
> > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/PiSmmCore/PiSmmIpl.c
> > @@ -973,6 +973,10 @@ ExecuteSmmCoreFromSmram (
> > // Since the memory range to load SMM CORE will be cut out in SMM
> core, so no need to allocate and free this range
> > //
> > PageCount = 0;
> > + //
> > + // Reserved Smram Region for SmmCore is not used, and remove it
> from SmramRangeCount.
> > + //
> > + gSmmCorePrivate->SmramRangeCount --;
> > } else {
> > DEBUG ((EFI_D_INFO, "LOADING MODULE FIXED ERROR: Loading
> module at fixed address at address failed\n"));
> > //
> > @@ -1299,6 +1303,7 @@ GetFullSmramRanges (
> > UINTN Index2;
> > EFI_SMRAM_DESCRIPTOR *FullSmramRanges;
> > UINTN TempSmramRangeCount;
> > + UINTN AdditionSmramRangeCount;
> > EFI_SMRAM_DESCRIPTOR *TempSmramRanges;
> > UINTN SmramRangeCount;
> > EFI_SMRAM_DESCRIPTOR *SmramRanges;
> > @@ -1332,12 +1337,23 @@ GetFullSmramRanges (
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + //
> > + // Reserve one entry for SMM Core in the full SMRAM ranges.
>
> You have moved comment "Reserve one entry for SMM Core in the full
> SMRAM
> ranges." to here.
>
> > + //
> > + AdditionSmramRangeCount = 1;
> > + if (PcdGet64(PcdLoadModuleAtFixAddressEnable) != 0) {
> > + //
> > + // Reserve two entries for all SMM drivers and SMM Core in the full
> SMRAM ranges.
> > + //
> > + AdditionSmramRangeCount = 2;
> > + }
> > +
> > if (SmramReservedCount == 0) {
> > //
> > // No reserved SMRAM entry from SMM Configuration Protocol.
> > // Reserve one entry for SMM Core in the full SMRAM ranges.
>
> Since you have move comment "Reserve one entry for SMM Core in the full
> SMRAM ranges." to the code above, how about remove it in this comments?
>
> Thanks,
> Star
>
> > //
> > - *FullSmramRangeCount = SmramRangeCount + 1;
> > + *FullSmramRangeCount = SmramRangeCount +
> AdditionSmramRangeCount;
> > Size = (*FullSmramRangeCount) * sizeof (EFI_SMRAM_DESCRIPTOR);
> > FullSmramRanges = (EFI_SMRAM_DESCRIPTOR *) AllocateZeroPool
> (Size);
> > ASSERT (FullSmramRanges != NULL);
> > @@ -1449,10 +1465,9 @@ GetFullSmramRanges (
> > ASSERT (TempSmramRangeCount <= MaxCount);
> >
> > //
> > - // Sort the entries,
> > - // and reserve one entry for SMM Core in the full SMRAM ranges.
> > + // Sort the entries
> > //
> > - FullSmramRanges = AllocateZeroPool ((TempSmramRangeCount + 1) *
> sizeof (EFI_SMRAM_DESCRIPTOR));
> > + FullSmramRanges = AllocateZeroPool ((TempSmramRangeCount +
> AdditionSmramRangeCount) * sizeof (EFI_SMRAM_DESCRIPTOR));
> > ASSERT (FullSmramRanges != NULL);
> > *FullSmramRangeCount = 0;
> > do {
> > @@ -1472,7 +1487,7 @@ GetFullSmramRanges (
> > TempSmramRanges[Index].PhysicalSize = 0;
> > } while (*FullSmramRangeCount < TempSmramRangeCount);
> > ASSERT (*FullSmramRangeCount == TempSmramRangeCount);
> > - *FullSmramRangeCount += 1;
> > + *FullSmramRangeCount += AdditionSmramRangeCount;
> >
> > FreePool (SmramRanges);
> > FreePool (SmramReservedRanges);
> > @@ -1510,6 +1525,7 @@ SmmIplEntry (
> > EFI_LOAD_FIXED_ADDRESS_CONFIGURATION_TABLE
> *LMFAConfigurationTable;
> > EFI_CPU_ARCH_PROTOCOL *CpuArch;
> > EFI_STATUS SetAttrStatus;
> > + EFI_SMRAM_DESCRIPTOR *SmramRangeSmmDriver;
> >
> > //
> > // Fill in the image handle of the SMM IPL so the SMM Core can use this as
> the
> > @@ -1619,6 +1635,19 @@ SmmIplEntry (
> > //
> > DEBUG ((EFI_D_INFO, "LOADING MODULE FIXED INFO: TSEG BASE
> is %x. \n", LMFAConfigurationTable->SmramBase));
> > }
> > +
> > + //
> > + // Fill the Smram range for all SMM code
> > + //
> > + SmramRangeSmmDriver = &gSmmCorePrivate-
> >SmramRanges[gSmmCorePrivate->SmramRangeCount - 2];
> > + SmramRangeSmmDriver->CpuStart = mCurrentSmramRange-
> >CpuStart;
> > + SmramRangeSmmDriver->PhysicalStart = mCurrentSmramRange-
> >PhysicalStart;
> > + SmramRangeSmmDriver->RegionState = mCurrentSmramRange-
> >RegionState | EFI_ALLOCATED;
> > + SmramRangeSmmDriver->PhysicalSize = SmmCodeSize;
> > +
> > + mCurrentSmramRange->PhysicalSize -= SmmCodeSize;
> > + mCurrentSmramRange->CpuStart = mCurrentSmramRange-
> >CpuStart + SmmCodeSize;
> > + mCurrentSmramRange->PhysicalStart = mCurrentSmramRange-
> >PhysicalStart + SmmCodeSize;
> > }
> > //
> > // Load SMM Core into SMRAM and execute it from SMRAM
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-12 1:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-01 6:49 [Patch 0/2] MdeModulePkg SmmCore: Fix hang issue when LMFA enable Liming Gao
2016-12-01 6:49 ` [Patch 1/2] MdeModulePkg SmmIpl: Fill Smram range for SMM driver " Liming Gao
2016-12-09 10:20 ` Zeng, Star
2016-12-12 1:48 ` Gao, Liming [this message]
2016-12-01 6:49 ` [Patch 2/2] MdeModulePkg PiSmmCore: Retrieve Smram base address from system table Liming Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14D69F002@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox