From: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
Sergei Temerkhanov <s.temerkhanov@gmail.com>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MdePkg: Fix undefined behavior on variadic parameters
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 01:35:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14D730AC8@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <af9b30bd-f76d-2a74-b4c0-c173176cc9b6@redhat.com>
Laszlo:
Based on your analysis, the parameter type should be changed from BOOLEAN to INT32 to match its promotion type. Right?
Thanks
Liming
>-----Original Message-----
>From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
>Laszlo Ersek
>Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2017 6:20 PM
>To: Sergei Temerkhanov <s.temerkhanov@gmail.com>; Gao, Liming
><liming.gao@intel.com>
>Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] MdePkg: Fix undefined behavior on variadic
>parameters
>
>On 05/16/17 14:10, Sergei Temerkhanov wrote:
>> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 8:10 AM, Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
>wrote:
>>> Sergey:
>>> Could you give more detail on the undefined behavior on variadic
>parameters?
>>>
>>> I see https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=410 describe this
>issues found in the latest CLANG tool chain. Do you find other tool chain
>reports it?
>>
>> Yes, this is exactly the bug this patch fixes.
>>
>> As per the C99 standard:
>> "The parameter parmN is the identifier of the rightmost parameter in
>> the variable parameter list in the function definition (the one just
>> before the , ...). If the parameter parmN is declared with the
>> register storage class, with a function or array type, or with a type
>> that is not compatible with the type that results after application of
>> the default argument promotions, the behavior is undefined."
>>
>> That's exactly the case here since BOOLEAN is a typedef for unsigned
>> char. It undergoes a promotion to an unsigned int
>
>Side topic:
>
>It is promoted, but not to "unsigned int".
>
>The standard says, in "6.3.1.1 Boolean, characters, and integers",
>paragraph 2,
>
> The following may be used in an expression wherever an /int/ or
> /unsigned int/ may be used:
>
> — An object or expression with an integer type whose integer
> conversion rank is less than or equal to the rank of /int/ and
> /unsigned int/.
> — A bit-field of type /_Bool/, /int/, /signed int/, or
> /unsigned int/.
>
> If an /int/ can represent all values of the original type, the value
> is converted to an /int/; otherwise, it is converted to an
> /unsigned int/. These are called the /integer promotions/. [...]
>
>On all supported edk2 platforms, "unsigned char"'s range is 0..255
>inclusive, which can be represented by "int" (again on all supported
>edk2 platforms). So the promotion occurs to "int", not "unsigned int"
>
>
>Furthermore, in place of the suggested UINTN type (which is fine), the
>following further types would be correct: INT32, UINT32, INT64, UINT64,
>INTN. The reason is that all of these map to standard C types, on all
>edk2 platforms, whose integer conversion ranks are not less than that of
>"int" and "unsigned int". Hence they are all unaffected by the integer
>promotions.
>
>(This digression does not affect your main point, which remains correct;
>I just wanted to be precise here, since we're quoting the standard.)
>
>Thanks
>Laszlo
>
>> which is not a
>> compatible type for unsigned char. Correct me if I'm wrong.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sergey
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Liming
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
>Sergey Temerkhanov
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 10:57 AM
>>>> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>>>> Subject: [edk2] [PATCH] MdePkg: Fix undefined behavior on variadic
>parameters
>>>>
>>>> Fix undefined behavior by avoiding parameter type promotion
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Temerkhanov <s.temerkhanov@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> MdePkg/Include/Library/UefiLib.h | 2 +-
>>>> MdePkg/Library/UefiLib/UefiLib.c | 2 +-
>>>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/Library/UefiLib.h
>b/MdePkg/Include/Library/UefiLib.h
>>>> index 0b14792..4e4697c 100644
>>>> --- a/MdePkg/Include/Library/UefiLib.h
>>>> +++ b/MdePkg/Include/Library/UefiLib.h
>>>> @@ -818,7 +818,7 @@ CHAR8 *
>>>> EFIAPI
>>>> GetBestLanguage (
>>>> IN CONST CHAR8 *SupportedLanguages,
>>>> - IN BOOLEAN Iso639Language,
>>>> + IN UINTN Iso639Language,
>>>> ...
>>>> );
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/MdePkg/Library/UefiLib/UefiLib.c
>b/MdePkg/Library/UefiLib/UefiLib.c
>>>> index a7eee01..74528ec 100644
>>>> --- a/MdePkg/Library/UefiLib/UefiLib.c
>>>> +++ b/MdePkg/Library/UefiLib/UefiLib.c
>>>> @@ -1514,7 +1514,7 @@ CHAR8 *
>>>> EFIAPI
>>>> GetBestLanguage (
>>>> IN CONST CHAR8 *SupportedLanguages,
>>>> - IN BOOLEAN Iso639Language,
>>>> + IN UINTN Iso639Language,
>>>> ...
>>>> )
>>>> {
>>>> --
>>>> 2.7.4
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> edk2-devel mailing list
>>>> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>>>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> edk2-devel mailing list
>> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>edk2-devel mailing list
>edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-19 1:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-16 2:56 [PATCH] Arm: GICv3: Don't access GIC_ICDIPR for interrupts 0..31 Sergey Temerkhanov
2017-05-16 2:56 ` [PATCH] MdePkg: Fix undefined behavior on variadic parameters Sergey Temerkhanov
2017-05-16 5:10 ` Gao, Liming
2017-05-16 12:10 ` Sergei Temerkhanov
2017-05-17 15:30 ` Gao, Liming
2017-05-18 0:26 ` Sergei Temerkhanov
2017-05-18 3:06 ` Andrew Fish
2017-05-19 3:01 ` Sergei Temerkhanov
2017-05-18 10:19 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-05-19 1:35 ` Gao, Liming [this message]
2017-05-19 8:12 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-05-19 2:45 ` Sergei Temerkhanov
2017-05-19 8:16 ` Laszlo Ersek
2017-05-24 2:14 ` Gao, Liming
2017-05-24 2:46 ` Kinney, Michael D
2017-05-24 11:15 ` Sergei Temerkhanov
2017-05-16 2:56 ` [PATCH] MdeModulePkg: " Sergey Temerkhanov
2017-05-18 16:08 ` [PATCH] Arm: GICv3: Don't access GIC_ICDIPR for interrupts 0..31 Ard Biesheuvel
2017-05-19 2:37 ` Sergei Temerkhanov
2017-05-19 10:26 ` Leif Lindholm
2017-05-19 14:31 ` Sergei Temerkhanov
2017-05-22 17:45 ` Leif Lindholm
2017-05-23 10:23 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14D730AC8@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox