From: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
To: Michael Zimmermann <sigmaepsilon92@gmail.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] MdePkg: add RETURNS_TWICE attribute
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 16:51:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E198BE9@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN9vWD+PcSqkx6g6f7Lc+CKz+1=C3WtW3bXdtm-q1DCgFySMUg@mail.gmail.com>
Michael:
I suggest to add comments for each definition although there is redundant.
Besides, after I apply these three patches, and build MdePkg.dsc with VS2015x86. It will report below error. Could you help look it?
"C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 14.0\Vc\bin\cl.exe" /Foc:\r9tips\allpkg\edk2\Build\Mde\DEBUG_VS2015x86\IA32\MdePkg\Library\BaseCacheMaintenanceLib\BaseCacheMaintenanceLib\OUTPUT\.\X86Cache.obj /nologo /arch:IA32 /c /WX /GS- /W4 /Gs32768 /D UNICODE /O1b2 /GL /FIAutoGen.h /EHs-c- /GR- /GF /Gy /Zi /Gm /Gw -D DISABLE_NEW_DEPRECATED_INTERFACES /Ic:\r9tips\allpkg\edk2\MdePkg\Library\BaseCacheMaintenanceLib /Ic:\r9tips\allpkg\edk2\Build\Mde\DEBUG_VS2015x86\IA32\MdePkg\Library\BaseCacheMaintenanceLib\BaseCacheMaintenanceLib\DEBUG /Ic:\r9tips\allpkg\edk2\MdePkg /Ic:\r9tips\allpkg\edk2\MdePkg\Include /Ic:\r9tips\allpkg\edk2\MdePkg\Include\Ia32 c:\r9tips\allpkg\edk2\MdePkg\Library\BaseCacheMaintenanceLib\X86Cache.c
X86Cache.c
c:\r9tips\allpkg\edk2\MdePkg\Include\Library/BaseLib.h(4933): error C2059: syntax error: 'type'
NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Visual Studio 14.0\Vc\bin\cl.exe"' : return code '0x2'
Stop.
Thanks
Liming
From: Michael Zimmermann [mailto:sigmaepsilon92@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 25, 2017 11:50 PM
To: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH 1/3] MdePkg: add RETURNS_TWICE attribute
Liming:
The other macros have comments both before the compiler directives and before each define for each compiler.
To me it looks like these are slightly differently formulated only and kinda redundant too.
Is there a rule or do you have suggestions for writing comments for this kind of macro?
On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 4:11 AM, Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com<mailto:liming.gao@intel.com>> wrote:
Micha:
Could you add comments for new macro RETURNS_TWICE like others, such as ANALYZER_NORETURN?
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org<mailto:ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>]
>Sent: Friday, December 22, 2017 11:24 PM
>To: M1cha <sigmaepsilon92@gmail.com<mailto:sigmaepsilon92@gmail.com>>
>Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>; Kinney, Michael D
><michael.d.kinney@intel.com<mailto:michael.d.kinney@intel.com>>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com<mailto:liming.gao@intel.com>>
>Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH 1/3] MdePkg: add RETURNS_TWICE attribute
>
>On 22 December 2017 at 07:23, M1cha <sigmaepsilon92@gmail.com<mailto:sigmaepsilon92@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Zimmermann <sigmaepsilon92@gmail.com<mailto:sigmaepsilon92@gmail.com>>
>> ---
>> MdePkg/Include/Base.h | 10 ++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/Base.h b/MdePkg/Include/Base.h
>> index 22ab5d3715fb..c863de407418 100644
>> --- a/MdePkg/Include/Base.h
>> +++ b/MdePkg/Include/Base.h
>> @@ -218,6 +218,16 @@ VERIFY_SIZE_OF (__VERIFY_UINT32_ENUM_SIZE,
>4);
>> #endif
>> #endif
>>
>> +#ifndef RETURNS_TWICE
>> + #if defined (__GNUC__) || defined (__clang__)
>> + #define RETURNS_TWICE __attribute__((returns_twice))
>> + #elif defined(_MSC_EXTENSIONS) && !defined(MDE_CPU_EBC)
>> + #define RETURNS_TWICE
>> + #else
>> + #define RETURNS_TWICE
>
>What is the point of having two versions that are #defined to nothing?
>
>> + #endif
>> +#endif
>> +
>> //
>> // For symbol name in assembly code, an extra "_" is sometimes necessary
>> //
>> --
>> 2.15.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-26 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-22 7:23 [PATCH 0/3] fix GCC optimizations and warnings for SetJump/LongJump M1cha
2017-12-22 7:23 ` [PATCH 1/3] MdePkg: add RETURNS_TWICE attribute M1cha
2017-12-22 15:24 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-12-22 18:27 ` Michael Zimmermann
2017-12-25 3:11 ` Gao, Liming
2017-12-25 15:50 ` Michael Zimmermann
2017-12-26 16:51 ` Gao, Liming [this message]
2017-12-26 20:00 ` Michael Zimmermann
2017-12-27 15:56 ` Gao, Liming
2017-12-22 7:23 ` [PATCH 2/3] MdePkg/BaseLib: add attribute 'RETURNS_TWICE' to SetJump M1cha
2017-12-22 15:27 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-12-22 7:23 ` [PATCH 3/3] MdePkg: add NORETURN attribute to LongJump and InternalLongJump M1cha
2017-12-22 15:27 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-12-22 17:55 ` [PATCH 0/3] fix GCC optimizations and warnings for SetJump/LongJump Kinney, Michael D
2017-12-22 18:26 ` Michael Zimmermann
2017-12-22 19:01 ` Kinney, Michael D
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E198BE9@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox