From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=192.55.52.93; helo=mga11.intel.com; envelope-from=liming.gao@intel.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C6002215BDA8 for ; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 06:24:17 -0800 (PST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 29 Jan 2018 06:29:50 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.46,431,1511856000"; d="scan'208";a="170005765" Received: from fmsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.201]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Jan 2018 06:29:50 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx116.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.20) by FMSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 06:29:50 -0800 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.153) by fmsmsx116.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.116.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 06:29:49 -0800 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.127]) by SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.192]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Mon, 29 Jan 2018 22:29:48 +0800 From: "Gao, Liming" To: "Tiger Liu(BJ-RD)" , "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" Thread-Topic: [edk2] difference between asm16 and asm files Thread-Index: AdOY7nxNRNXze2hdSW+bU2s0RmG0IwAHlVCA Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 14:29:48 +0000 Message-ID: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E1B8F6F@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <03bac7d59f724f62ad243298c1d970b7@zhaoxin.com> In-Reply-To: <03bac7d59f724f62ad243298c1d970b7@zhaoxin.com> Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.0.116 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: difference between asm16 and asm files X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 14:24:18 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Asm16 is compiled to the binary file. Asm is compiled to the obj file, and = linked into lib and EFI image.=20 Now, asm16 is replaced by nasmb. Asm is replaced by nasm. If you check SecC= ore.inf, you will find ResetVec.asm16 is not used, and ResetVec.nasmb is us= ed. I will send the patch to remove the unused ResetVec.asm16 to avoid the = confuse. > -----Original Message----- > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Ti= ger Liu(BJ-RD) > Sent: Monday, January 29, 2018 6:49 PM > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org > Subject: [edk2] difference between asm16 and asm files >=20 > Hi, experts: > I have a question about asm16 postfix and asm postfix. >=20 > Such as: > UefiCpuPkg\SecCore\Ia32\ResetVec.asm16 >=20 > Why not use asm as postfix? >=20 > Thanks >=20 > Best wishes, >=20 >=20 > ????? > ????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > CONFIDENTIAL NOTE: > This email contains confidential or legally privileged information and is= for the sole use of its intended recipient. Any unauthorized > review, use, copying or forwarding of this email or the content of this e= mail is strictly prohibited. > _______________________________________________ > edk2-devel mailing list > edk2-devel@lists.01.org > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel