From: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
To: Marvin H?user <Marvin.Haeuser@outlook.com>,
"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Cc: "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 0/3] Use comparison logic to check UINTN parameter in GetBestLanguage API
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 03:36:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E28DC77@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR0801MB1790EB3BD85ECEEA1EF3CDDB806E0@VI1PR0801MB1790.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Marvin:
Current solution is to keep max compatibility.
Thanks
Liming
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Marvin H?user [mailto:Marvin.Haeuser@outlook.com]
>Sent: Monday, May 28, 2018 4:11 PM
>To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>Cc: Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
>Subject: RE: [edk2] [Patch 0/3] Use comparison logic to check UINTN
>parameter in GetBestLanguage API
>
>Hey Star and Liming,
>
>May I propose re-considering the introduction of a third named parameter to
>reflect the first Language passed?
>This would 1) have the advantage that the BOOLEAN parameter can remain as
>is, which increases readability and
>2) require at least two parameters related to the language list passed. Having
>to write "NULL, NULL" is way more obvious than just having to write "NULL"
>when (accidentally?) not passing any language.
>
>And error caused by this change would be calls that do not pass an expected
>amount of parameters for the call to make sense.
>
>Thanks,
>Marvin.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: edk2-devel <edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org> On Behalf Of Zeng,
>> Star
>> Sent: Monday, May 28, 2018 9:54 AM
>> To: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>> Cc: Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [edk2] [Patch 0/3] Use comparison logic to check UINTN
>> parameter in GetBestLanguage API
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of
>> Liming Gao
>> Sent: Monday, May 28, 2018 3:31 PM
>> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>> Subject: [edk2] [Patch 0/3] Use comparison logic to check UINTN parameter
>> in GetBestLanguage API
>>
>> Liming Gao (3):
>> MdePkg UefiLib: Use comparison logic to check UINTN parameter
>> IntelFrameworkPkg UefiLib: Use comparison logic to check UINTN
>> parameter
>> MdeModulePkg Variable: Use comparison logic to check UINTN parameter
>>
>> IntelFrameworkPkg/Library/FrameworkUefiLib/UefiLib.c | 6 +++---
>> MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/EmuRuntimeDxe/EmuVariable.c | 8
>> ++++----
>> MdeModulePkg/Universal/Variable/RuntimeDxe/Variable.c | 8 ++++----
>> MdePkg/Library/UefiLib/UefiLib.c | 6 +++---
>> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.8.0.windows.1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> edk2-devel mailing list
>> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>> _______________________________________________
>> edk2-devel mailing list
>> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-29 4:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-28 7:30 [Patch 0/3] Use comparison logic to check UINTN parameter in GetBestLanguage API Liming Gao
2018-05-28 7:30 ` [Patch 1/3] MdePkg UefiLib: Use comparison logic to check UINTN parameter Liming Gao
2018-05-28 7:30 ` [Patch 2/3] IntelFrameworkPkg " Liming Gao
2018-05-28 7:30 ` [Patch 3/3] MdeModulePkg Variable: " Liming Gao
2018-05-28 7:53 ` [Patch 0/3] Use comparison logic to check UINTN parameter in GetBestLanguage API Zeng, Star
2018-05-28 8:10 ` Marvin H?user
2018-05-29 3:36 ` Gao, Liming [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E28DC77@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox