From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=134.134.136.65; helo=mga03.intel.com; envelope-from=liming.gao@intel.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12ADC21162CCD for ; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 08:00:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Jun 2018 08:00:56 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.49,483,1520924400"; d="scan'208";a="61781736" Received: from fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.202]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Jun 2018 08:00:56 -0700 Received: from fmsmsx102.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.200) by fmsmsx104.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.202) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 08:00:55 -0700 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by FMSMSX102.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.200) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 08:00:55 -0700 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.87]) by shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.223]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Wed, 6 Jun 2018 23:00:53 +0800 From: "Gao, Liming" To: Guy Raviv , "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" Thread-Topic: [edk2] Crc32 Calculation Miss Thread-Index: AQHT/aFBQTvfIsEKbUmXnYLC6pMKv6RTUu7A Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2018 15:00:53 +0000 Message-ID: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E2939F2@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiYmE4MDM2MzAtMDhmZi00OTBhLWJhODgtZjg5OTJjMWUyNGUxIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoicmEyYm05ZGIxRFRrelBMN0x3QW82NFE3YkN4MFlCTmFNZU9adGhhZFhNU1gwNWpzTW5wUW5FN0h6R2Zzb0JaUiJ9 dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.200.100 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Crc32 Calculation Miss X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2018 15:00:57 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Do you use CalculateCrc32() in BaseLib to calculate CRC32 value for the dif= ferent buffer? > -----Original Message----- > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Gu= y Raviv > Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 10:18 PM > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org > Subject: [edk2] Crc32 Calculation Miss >=20 > Hi Everyone, >=20 > I have an odd problem. > In a specific module in my code (MRC training), code modification doesn't > change the BIOS Crc calculation. > 1. i checked in my project's fdf file if the FV base address and region > size defined are the same as the parameters i'm putting in the calculatio= n. > 2. i also compared two different binaries and found they are exactly the > same. >=20 > does anyone have any idea what can be wrong here or where should i check? >=20 > Thanks, > Guy > _______________________________________________ > edk2-devel mailing list > edk2-devel@lists.01.org > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel