public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
	edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] BaseTools/Source/C: take EXTRA_OPTFLAGS and EXTRA_LDFLAGS from the caller
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2018 14:48:33 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E2C6726@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7fcaa55c-abf5-25ff-2a08-6168ee10fd01@redhat.com>

Laszlo:
  Thanks for your detail information. I understand EXTRA_OPTFLAGS. So, its name is OK to me. 

  On Pccts, it is the third party code. I would like to make the minimal change. So, I ask whether we not touch it. 

Thanks
Liming
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:lersek@redhat.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 3, 2018 1:41 AM
> To: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
> Cc: Zhu, Yonghong <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] BaseTools/Source/C: take EXTRA_OPTFLAGS and EXTRA_LDFLAGS from the caller
> 
> On 08/02/18 17:40, Gao, Liming wrote:
> > Laszlo:
> >   I understand this patch set is to provide the way to append compile and link option for BaseTools source build.
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > If so, the extend flag name may be EXTRA_CCFLAGS
> 
> I can rename EXTRA_OPTFLAGS to EXTRA_CCFLAGS, but in that case,
> internally we will have:
> 
>   BUILD_OPTFLAGS = -O2 $(EXTRA_CCFLAGS)
> 
> in "header.makefile". In that case, I expect to receive a comment that
> we shouldn't append a generic "CCFLAGS" variable to a more specialized
> "OPTFLAGS" variable.
> 
> Obviously, I can rename "BUILD_OPTFLAGS" to "BUILD_CCFLAGS" as well --
> but, in that case, I expect to receive a comment that we already have
> "BUILD_CFLAGS".
> 
> The variable (more precisely, "RPM macro") that the Fedora distribution
> will put into EXTRA_OPTFLAGS is also called %{optflags}. So I think
> EXTRA_OPTFLAGS is an appropriate name.
> 
> 
> If you still disagree, then can you please suggest a new name not just
> for EXTRA_OPTFLAGS (-->EXTRA_CCFLAGS), but also for BUILD_OPTFLAGS?
> Patch #3 explains why we need a separate BUILD_OPTFLAGS Makefile macro.
> 
> 
> > and EXTRA_LDFLAGS.
> 
> Right, that's the currently proposed name.
> 
> > And, the extend flags are appended in the tail.
> 
> Correct.
> 
> >   Besides, Pccts is the internal tool to generate VfrCompiler syntax source file. It is not used in build process. I am not sure why they
> also require the additional CC and LD flags.
> 
> It's a general policy thing; all native binaries should be built with
> the system-wide flags. Some of those flags will let the binaries detect
> some buffer overflows automatically, for example, which is helpful even
> if the utility is never installed / packaged, just used as a one-off
> build tool.
> 
> Thanks!
> Laszlo
> 
> >
> > Thanks
> > Liming
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:lersek@redhat.com]
> >> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2018 8:44 AM
> >> To: edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
> >> Cc: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; Zhu, Yonghong <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
> >> Subject: [PATCH 0/6] BaseTools/Source/C: take EXTRA_OPTFLAGS and EXTRA_LDFLAGS from the caller
> >>
> >> Repo:   https://github.com/lersek/edk2.git
> >> Branch: extra_flags_rhbz1540244
> >>
> >> In the Fedora distribution, we'd like to pass system-wide flags related
> >> to optimization and linking when the C and C++ language base tools are
> >> built. This series lets the outermost "make" command push the
> >> EXTRA_OPTFLAGS and EXTRA_LDFLAGS macros into the BaseTools build.
> >>
> >> Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Laszlo
> >>
> >> Laszlo Ersek (6):
> >>   BaseTools/footer.makefile: expand BUILD_CFLAGS last for C files too
> >>   BaseTools/header.makefile: remove "-c" from BUILD_CFLAGS
> >>   BaseTools/Source/C: split "-O2" to BUILD_OPTFLAGS
> >>   BaseTools/Pccts: clean up antlr and dlg makefiles
> >>   BaseTools/Source/C: take EXTRA_OPTFLAGS from the caller
> >>   BaseTools/Source/C: take EXTRA_LDFLAGS from the caller
> >>
> >>  BaseTools/Source/C/Makefiles/footer.makefile       |  2 +-
> >>  BaseTools/Source/C/Makefiles/header.makefile       | 16 ++++++++---
> >>  BaseTools/Source/C/VfrCompile/GNUmakefile          | 11 +++++---
> >>  BaseTools/Source/C/VfrCompile/Pccts/antlr/makefile | 22 ++++++++++-----
> >>  BaseTools/Source/C/VfrCompile/Pccts/dlg/makefile   | 28 +++++++++++++-------
> >>  5 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.14.1.3.gb7cf6e02401b
> >


  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-06 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-26  0:44 [PATCH 0/6] BaseTools/Source/C: take EXTRA_OPTFLAGS and EXTRA_LDFLAGS from the caller Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-26  0:44 ` [PATCH 1/6] BaseTools/footer.makefile: expand BUILD_CFLAGS last for C files too Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-26  0:44 ` [PATCH 2/6] BaseTools/header.makefile: remove "-c" from BUILD_CFLAGS Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-26  0:44 ` [PATCH 3/6] BaseTools/Source/C: split "-O2" to BUILD_OPTFLAGS Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-26  0:44 ` [PATCH 4/6] BaseTools/Pccts: clean up antlr and dlg makefiles Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-26  0:44 ` [PATCH 5/6] BaseTools/Source/C: take EXTRA_OPTFLAGS from the caller Laszlo Ersek
2018-07-26  0:44 ` [PATCH 6/6] BaseTools/Source/C: take EXTRA_LDFLAGS " Laszlo Ersek
2018-08-02 15:40 ` [PATCH 0/6] BaseTools/Source/C: take EXTRA_OPTFLAGS and " Gao, Liming
2018-08-02 17:40   ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-08-06 14:48     ` Gao, Liming [this message]
2018-08-06 15:18       ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-08-06 16:41         ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-08-07  5:27           ` Gao, Liming
2018-08-07 12:23             ` Laszlo Ersek
2018-08-08 21:15               ` Laszlo Ersek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E2C6726@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox