From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=192.55.52.88; helo=mga01.intel.com; envelope-from=liming.gao@intel.com; receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66C1221197056 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 04:38:15 -0800 (PST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Dec 2018 04:38:14 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,338,1539673200"; d="scan'208";a="282390107" Received: from fmsmsx106.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.204]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Dec 2018 04:38:14 -0800 Received: from fmsmsx161.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.9) by FMSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 04:38:14 -0800 Received: from shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.154) by FMSMSX161.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.125.9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 04:38:13 -0800 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.203]) by shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.2.182]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Mon, 10 Dec 2018 20:38:11 +0800 From: "Gao, Liming" To: Leif Lindholm CC: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" , "Laszlo Ersek (lersek@redhat.com)" , "afish@apple.com" , "Kinney, Michael D" , "Rebecca Cran" Thread-Topic: [RFC] Remove unused tool chain configuration in BaseTools/Conf/tools_def.template Thread-Index: AdSNcRek6197s3I6R7y/qr6fFkc7nQCy0lUAABIYQ4A= Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:38:10 +0000 Message-ID: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E389792@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E384E67@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> <20181210115650.rr566vwiynd4en5j@bivouac.eciton.net> In-Reply-To: <20181210115650.rr566vwiynd4en5j@bivouac.eciton.net> Accept-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ctpclassification: CTP_NT x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiNTI1YjJjYzktNDMzMC00Njc0LWE5YjEtOTYzYzc3ODIwNWM1IiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX05UIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE3LjEwLjE4MDQuNDkiLCJUcnVzdGVkTGFiZWxIYXNoIjoicWZqYTdFcGlZbWRrU1FxTmc1ZVhET2VuaHFFXC9HSGNTMTB2aW9NN3dQWjI4RVNmR2R3RThNMHd0aUxaWUZha1wvIn0= dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 11.0.400.15 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove unused tool chain configuration in BaseTools/Conf/tools_def.template X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: EDK II Development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 12:38:15 -0000 Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Leif: Thanks for your suggestion. I will work out the patch set serials to remo= ve those tool chains. I don't remember the usage model of UNIXGCC. II will = wait for Rebecca response.=20 Thanks Liming > -----Original Message----- > From: Leif Lindholm [mailto:leif.lindholm@linaro.org] > Sent: Monday, December 10, 2018 7:57 PM > To: Gao, Liming > Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Laszlo Ersek (lersek@redhat.com) ; afish@apple.com; Kinney, Michael D > ; Rebecca Cran > Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove unused tool chain configuration in BaseTools/Co= nf/tools_def.template >=20 > On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 02:42:35PM +0000, Gao, Liming wrote: > > Hi, all > > tools_def.template includes all tool chains. Some are not used any > > more. And, there is no verification for them. So, I propose to > > remove them. They are VS2003, VS2005, VS2008, VS2010, DDK3790, > > UNIXGCC, GCC44, GCC45, GCC46, GCC47, ELFGCC, CYGGCC, ICC, ICC11, > > MYTOOLS. If you still use some one of them, please let me know. >=20 > This sounds good to me. >=20 > However, may I suggest splitting this up into several patches, such > that if we need to revert one of the deletions, we would not need to > reinstate all of them. >=20 > I would propose: > - One patch for VS20nn > - One patch for GCCnn > - One patch for UNIXGCC, ELFGCC, CYGGCC >=20 > I can't really judge what a suitable mashup/split between DDK3790, > ICC, ICC11, and MYTOOLS would be. >=20 > On a sidenote, I think Rebecca said at least FreeBSD were using > UNIXGCC(?) since the plain GCC toolchain profiles did not support > cross compiling. I am pretty sure that is not accurate these days - > did you look into that after the community call? >=20 > Regards. >=20 > Leif