public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>
To: "Zhang, Shenglei" <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>,
	"edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] BaseTools/DevicePath: Add a checking step
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 03:08:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E3D1B4B@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181212031011.20996-2-shenglei.zhang@intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Shenglei Zhang
> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2018 11:10 AM
> To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
> Subject: [edk2] [PATCH v2 2/2] BaseTools/DevicePath: Add a checking step
> 
> Add a checking step in DevicePathUtilities.c
> to verify DevicePath.
> https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1372
> 
> v2: Remove ASSERT() and the redundant checking step.
>     Update related description.
> 
> Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
> Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
> Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Shenglei Zhang <shenglei.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
>  .../Source/C/DevicePath/DevicePathUtilities.c   | 17 ++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/DevicePath/DevicePathUtilities.c b/BaseTools/Source/C/DevicePath/DevicePathUtilities.c
> index f8a41ff97d..e0399cfea7 100644
> --- a/BaseTools/Source/C/DevicePath/DevicePathUtilities.c
> +++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/DevicePath/DevicePathUtilities.c
> @@ -36,12 +36,13 @@ CONST EFI_DEVICE_PATH_PROTOCOL  mUefiDevicePathLibEndDevicePath = {
> 
>  /**
>    Determine whether a given device path is valid.
> -  If DevicePath is NULL, then ASSERT().
> 
>    @param  DevicePath  A pointer to a device path data structure.
>    @param  MaxSize     The maximum size of the device path data structure.
> 
>    @retval TRUE        DevicePath is valid.
> +  @retval FALSE       DevicePath is NULL.
> +  @retval FALSE       Maxsize is less than sizeof(EFI_DEVICE_PATH_PROTOCOL).
>    @retval FALSE       The length of any node node in the DevicePath is less
>                        than sizeof (EFI_DEVICE_PATH_PROTOCOL).
>    @retval FALSE       If MaxSize is not zero, the size of the DevicePath
> @@ -59,17 +60,15 @@ IsDevicePathValid (
>    UINTN Size;
>    UINTN NodeLength;
> 
> -  ASSERT (DevicePath != NULL);
> +  //
> +  //  Validate the input whether exists and its size big enough to touch the first node
> +  //
> +  if (DevicePath == NULL || (MaxSize > 0 && MaxSize < END_DEVICE_PATH_LENGTH)) {
> +	return FALSE;
> +  }
> 
>    if (MaxSize == 0) {
>      MaxSize = MAX_UINT32;
> - }
> -
> -  //
> -  // Validate the input size big enough to touch the first node.
> -  //
> -  if (MaxSize < sizeof (EFI_DEVICE_PATH_PROTOCOL)) {
> -    return FALSE;
>    }
> 
>    for (Count = 0, Size = 0; !IsDevicePathEnd (DevicePath); DevicePath = NextDevicePathNode (DevicePath)) {
> --
> 2.18.0.windows.1
> 
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel


  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-29  3:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-12  3:10 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add a checking step in MdePkg and Basetools Shenglei Zhang
2018-12-12  3:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] BaseTools/DevicePath: Add a checking step Shenglei Zhang
2019-01-29  3:08   ` Gao, Liming [this message]
2018-12-12  3:10 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] MdePkg/UefiDevicePathLib: " Shenglei Zhang
2019-01-29  1:29   ` Gao, Liming
2019-01-29  3:41   ` Ni, Ray

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E3D1B4B@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox