public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liming Gao" <liming.gao@intel.com>
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	"ryszard.knop@linux.intel.com" <ryszard.knop@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] Building current OVMF master with multiple workspaces on Windows/VS2017 fails due to missing includes?
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 14:46:44 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E42A562@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b4fd9826-1277-b7ad-12ed-c666fcf607aa@linux.intel.com>

This change needs to use new build_rule.txt. When call edksetup.bat, please try 'edksetup.bat Reconfig'. This command will copy build_rule.txt into Conf directory. 

Thanks
Liming
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of Ryszard Knop
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 10:56 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Subject: [edk2-devel] Building current OVMF master with multiple workspaces on Windows/VS2017 fails due to missing includes?
> 
> I have a bit odd issues with building OVMF from the current master
> branch (commit 0eccea3...), with the following setup using multiple
> workspaces (this is important):
> 
> - Windows 10, 64-bit
> - Visual Studio 2017 build tools (conf'd with VS2017_PREFIX envvar)
> - NASM 2.14.02 (conf'd with NASM_PREFIX envvar)
> - Python 3.7.3 running the latest BaseTools
> - WORKSPACE envvar points at a dir with extra modules to be included
> with OVMF (C:\Env\OvmfBuild)
> - PACKAGES_PATH points at the EDK2 repo (C:\Env\Workspace\edk2)
> 
> All envvars are set before edksetup. Trying to build -a X64 -p
> OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc -b RELEASE -t VS2017 fails with the following:
> 
> "C:\Env\BuildTools\MSVS2017_SDK_WDK_Windows10_16299\Program
> Files\Microsoft Visual
> Studio\2017\BuildTools\VC\Tools\MSVC\14.10.25017\bin\Hostx86\x64\cl.exe"
> /nologo /E /TC /FIAutoGen.h
> /IC:\Env\Workspace\edk2\MdePkg\Library\BaseLib\X64
> /IC:\Env\Workspace\edk2\MdePkg\Library\BaseLib
> /Ic:\Env\OvmfBuild\Build\OvmfX64\RELEASE_VS2017\X64\MdePkg\Library\BaseLib\BaseLib\DEBUG
> /IC:\Env\Workspace\edk2\MdePkg /IC:\Env\Workspace\edk2\MdePkg\Include
> /IC:\Env\Workspace\edk2\MdePkg\Include\X64
> C:\Env\Workspace\edk2\MdePkg\Library\BaseLib\X64\LongJump.nasm >
> c:\Env\OvmfBuild\Build\OvmfX64\RELEASE_VS2017\X64\MdePkg\Library\BaseLib\BaseLib\OUTPUT\X64\LongJump.i
> LongJump.nasm
>          Trim --trim-long --source-code -o
> c:\Env\OvmfBuild\Build\OvmfX64\RELEASE_VS2017\X64\MdePkg\Library\BaseLib\BaseLib\OUTPUT\X64\LongJump.iii
> c:\Env\OvmfBuild\Build\OvmfX64\RELEASE_VS2017\X64\MdePkg\Library\BaseLib\BaseLib\OUTPUT\X64\LongJump.i
>          "C:\Env\BuildTools\NASM\2.14.02\nasm"
> -IC:\Env\Workspace\edk2\MdePkg\Library\BaseLib\X64\ -Ox -f win64 -o
> c:\Env\OvmfBuild\Build\OvmfX64\RELEASE_VS2017\X64\MdePkg\Library\BaseLib\BaseLib\OUTPUT\X64\LongJump.obj
> c:\Env\OvmfBuild\Build\OvmfX64\RELEASE_VS2017\X64\MdePkg\Library\BaseLib\BaseLib\OUTPUT\X64\LongJump.iii
> c:\Env\OvmfBuild\Build\OvmfX64\RELEASE_VS2017\X64\MdePkg\Library\BaseLib\BaseLib\OUTPUT\X64\LongJump.iii:16:
> fatal: unable to open include file `Nasm.inc'
> NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'C:\Env\BuildTools\NASM\2.14.02\nasm.EXE' :
> return code '0x1'
> 
> Missing Nasm.inc, which is present in MdePkg/Include/X64/Nasm.inc - but
> the weird thing is, adding extra NASM include paths was added recently
> (in BaseTools/Source/Python/AutoGen/GenMake.py there's a block that
> replaces NASM_INC with appropriate directories, build_rule.template
> should generate NASM calls with these, as of commit 7c3a1ef). After
> adding a few prints to the GenMake I can see it does find the proper
> include paths, but none of them land in the final NASM call in the
> Makefile, even though it knows about the Nasm.inc dependency - the
> NASM_INC macro seems to be completely missing from the generated Makefile:
> 
> $(OUTPUT_DIR)\X64\LongJump.obj : $(MAKE_FILE)
> $(OUTPUT_DIR)\X64\LongJump.obj : C:\Env\Workspace\edk2\MdePkg\Include\Base.h
> $(OUTPUT_DIR)\X64\LongJump.obj :
> C:\Env\Workspace\edk2\MdePkg\Include\X64\Nasm.inc
> $(OUTPUT_DIR)\X64\LongJump.obj : $(DEBUG_DIR)\AutoGen.h
> $(OUTPUT_DIR)\X64\LongJump.obj :
> C:\Env\Workspace\edk2\MdePkg\Include\X64\ProcessorBind.h
> $(OUTPUT_DIR)\X64\LongJump.obj :
> C:\Env\Workspace\edk2\MdePkg\Include\Library\PcdLib.h
> $(OUTPUT_DIR)\X64\LongJump.obj :
> C:\Env\Workspace\edk2\MdePkg\Library\BaseLib\X64\LongJump.nasm
>      "$(PP)" $(PP_FLAGS) $(INC)
> C:\Env\Workspace\edk2\MdePkg\Library\BaseLib\X64\LongJump.nasm >
> c:\Env\OvmfBuild\Build\OvmfX64\RELEASE_VS2017\X64\MdePkg\Library\BaseLib\BaseLib\OUTPUT\X64\LongJump.i
>      Trim --trim-long --source-code -o
> c:\Env\OvmfBuild\Build\OvmfX64\RELEASE_VS2017\X64\MdePkg\Library\BaseLib\BaseLib\OUTPUT\X64\LongJump.iii
> c:\Env\OvmfBuild\Build\OvmfX64\RELEASE_VS2017\X64\MdePkg\Library\BaseLib\BaseLib\OUTPUT\X64\LongJump.i
>      "$(NASM)" -IC:\Env\Workspace\edk2\MdePkg\Library\BaseLib\X64\
> $(NASM_FLAGS) -o
> c:\Env\OvmfBuild\Build\OvmfX64\RELEASE_VS2017\X64\MdePkg\Library\BaseLib\BaseLib\OUTPUT\X64\LongJump.obj
> c:\Env\OvmfBuild\Build\OvmfX64\RELEASE_VS2017\X64\MdePkg\Library\BaseLib\BaseLib\OUTPUT\X64\LongJump.iii
> 
> The nasty workaround is to copy Nasm.inc into MdePkg/Library/BaseLib/X64
> and everything builds just fine after that.
> 
> Another interesting thing is that if I don't use WORKSPACE and
> PACKAGES_PATH (both contain no spaces and are on local file systems) but
> rather build everything directly in the EDK2 directory, OVMF also builds
> fine (Makefile contains the NASM_INC definition which is included in
> NASM calls). Have anyone also hit this issue?
> 
> Thanks, Richard
> 
> 
> 


      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-17 14:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-16 14:56 Building current OVMF master with multiple workspaces on Windows/VS2017 fails due to missing includes? Ryszard Knop
2019-04-16 16:53 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2019-04-17 14:46 ` Liming Gao [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E42A562@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox