From: "Liming Gao" <liming.gao@intel.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
"Feng, Bob C" <bob.c.feng@intel.com>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
Cc: "afish@apple.com" <afish@apple.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [Patch][edk2-stable201908] BaseTools: Fixed regression issue for building !x86 builds
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 16:00:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E4DE483@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dd9dbf3b-a920-c423-b20a-1d179851e7c9@redhat.com>
Laszlo:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:lersek@redhat.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 10:33 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Feng, Bob C <bob.c.feng@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Gao, Liming
> <liming.gao@intel.com>; Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
> Cc: afish@apple.com
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [Patch][edk2-stable201908] BaseTools: Fixed regression issue for building !x86 builds
>
> Bob,
>
> On 08/29/19 05:15, Bob Feng wrote:
> > Pushed at 37eef91017ad042035090cae46557f9d6e2d5917
>
> If I understand correctly, it remains the case that the BaseTools
> behavior -- which has now been restored, with this commit -- does not
> match the priority order for lib class resolutions in the DSC specification.
Yes. Keep the original behavior.
>
> Can you please file a documentation BZ for that?
>
I just submit BZ https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2141
Thanks
Liming
> Since the BaseTools maintainers know the DSC internals best, it would be
> great if you could also submit the DSC documentation patch too, for the
> new BZ. If you don't have time for that, then please be *very* specific
> in the documentation BZ, regarding the actual resolution order -- please
> don't just say "replace this with that", but please provide the full
> order, for describing the desired (= now-fixed) BaseTools behavior.
>
> Thanks
> Laszlo
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kinney, Michael D
> > Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2019 2:43 AM
> > To: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>; devel@edk2.groups.io; Feng, Bob C
> <bob.c.feng@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> > Cc: afish@apple.com; Laszlo Ersek (lersek@redhat.com) <lersek@redhat.com>
> > Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [Patch][edk2-stable201908] BaseTools: Fixed regression issue for building !x86 builds
> >
> > Hi Bob,
> >
> > I agree this is a critical regression issue that must be fixed for the edk2-stable201908 release.
> >
> > Tested-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Mike
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Gao, Liming
> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 8:22 AM
> >> To: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>; devel@edk2.groups.io;
> >> Feng, Bob C <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; afish@apple.com;
> >> Laszlo Ersek (lersek@redhat.com) <lersek@redhat.com>
> >> Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [Patch][edk2-stable201908]
> >> BaseTools: Fixed regression issue for building !x86 builds
> >>
> >> Bob:
> >> This fix is clear. Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >> Liming
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Leif Lindholm [mailto:leif.lindholm@linaro.org]
> >>> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 10:01 PM
> >>> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Feng, Bob C
> >> <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
> >>> Cc: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>
> >>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [Patch][edk2-stable201908]
> >> BaseTools: Fixed
> >>> regression issue for building !x86 builds
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 05:17:10PM +0800, Bob Feng
> >> wrote:
> >>>> BZ:
> >> https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2134
> >>>>
> >>>> This patch is to fix a build tool regression issue
> >> which was
> >>>> introduced by commit e8449e1d8e.
> >>>>
> >>>> In commit e8449e1d8e, build tool check the pcd
> >> before filter out the
> >>>> irrelevant library instance.
> >>>>
> >>>> The logic of evaluating the priority of the library
> >> class
> >>>> resolutions was not changed.
> >>>
> >>> Ah, OK, that greatly simplifies things.
> >>>
> >>> This resolves the issue(s) for me - thanks!
> >>>
> >>>> Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
> >>> Tested-by: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> .../Source/Python/Workspace/InfBuildData.py | 29
> >> ++++++++++---------
> >>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git
> >> a/BaseTools/Source/Python/Workspace/InfBuildData.py
> >>>> b/BaseTools/Source/Python/Workspace/InfBuildData.py
> >>>> index e63246b03b..7675b0ea00 100644
> >>>> ---
> >> a/BaseTools/Source/Python/Workspace/InfBuildData.py
> >>>> +++
> >> b/BaseTools/Source/Python/Workspace/InfBuildData.py
> >>>> @@ -154,12 +154,11 @@ class
> >> InfBuildData(ModuleBuildClassObject):
> >>>> self._PcdComments = None
> >>>> self._BuildOptions = None
> >>>> self._DependencyFileList = None
> >>>> self.LibInstances = []
> >>>> self.ReferenceModules = set()
> >>>> - self.Guids
> >>>> - self.Pcds
> >>>> +
> >>>> def SetReferenceModule(self,Module):
> >>>> self.ReferenceModules.add(Module)
> >>>> return self
> >>>>
> >>>> ## XXX[key] = value
> >>>> @@ -654,10 +653,24 @@ class
> >> InfBuildData(ModuleBuildClassObject):
> >>>> "Value of Guid
> >> [%s] is not found under [Guids] section in" % CName,
> >>>>
> >> ExtraData=PackageList, File=self.MetaFile,
> >> Line=Record[-1])
> >>>> RetVal[CName] = Value
> >>>> CommentRecords =
> >> self._RawData[MODEL_META_DATA_COMMENT, self._Arch, self._Platform,
> >> Record[5]]
> >>>> self._GuidComments[CName] = [a[0] for
> >> a in
> >>>> CommentRecords]
> >>>> +
> >>>> + for Type in
> >>>
> >> [MODEL_PCD_FIXED_AT_BUILD,MODEL_PCD_PATCHABLE_IN_MODULE
> >> ,MODEL_PCD_FEAT
> >>> URE_FLAG,MODEL_PCD_DYNAMIC,MODEL_PCD
> >>> _DYNAMIC_EX]:
> >>>> + RecordList = self._RawData[Type,
> >> self._Arch, self._Platform]
> >>>> + for TokenSpaceGuid, _, _, _, _, _,
> >> LineNo in RecordList:
> >>>> + # get the guid value
> >>>> + if TokenSpaceGuid not in RetVal:
> >>>> + Value =
> >> GuidValue(TokenSpaceGuid, self.Packages,
> >> self.MetaFile.Path)
> >>>> + if Value is None:
> >>>> + PackageList =
> >> "\n\t".join(str(P) for P in self.Packages)
> >>>> + EdkLogger.error('build',
> >> RESOURCE_NOT_AVAILABLE,
> >>>> + "Value of
> >> Guid [%s] is not found under [Guids] section in" % TokenSpaceGuid,
> >>>> +
> >> ExtraData=PackageList, File=self.MetaFile, Line=LineNo)
> >>>> + RetVal[TokenSpaceGuid] = Value
> >>>> +
> >> self._GuidsUsedByPcd[TokenSpaceGuid] = Value
> >>>> return RetVal
> >>>>
> >>>> ## Retrieve include paths necessary for this
> >> module (for Edk.x style of modules)
> >>>> @cached_property
> >>>> def Includes(self):
> >>>> @@ -856,11 +869,11 @@ class
> >> InfBuildData(ModuleBuildClassObject):
> >>>> if file_name.upper().endswith("DEC"):
> >>>> pkg =
> >> os.path.join(TopDir,file_name)
> >>>> return pkg
> >>>> @cached_class_function
> >>>> def GetGuidsUsedByPcd(self):
> >>>> - self.Pcds
> >>>> + self.Guid
> >>>> return self._GuidsUsedByPcd
> >>>>
> >>>> ## Retrieve PCD for given type
> >>>> def _GetPcd(self, Type):
> >>>> Pcds = OrderedDict()
> >>>> @@ -868,20 +881,10 @@ class
> >> InfBuildData(ModuleBuildClassObject):
> >>>> PcdList = []
> >>>> RecordList = self._RawData[Type,
> >> self._Arch, self._Platform]
> >>>> for TokenSpaceGuid, PcdCName, Setting,
> >> Arch, Platform, Id, LineNo in RecordList:
> >>>> PcdDict[Arch, Platform, PcdCName,
> >> TokenSpaceGuid] = (Setting, LineNo)
> >>>> PcdList.append((PcdCName,
> >> TokenSpaceGuid))
> >>>> - # get the guid value
> >>>> - if TokenSpaceGuid not in self.Guids:
> >>>> - Value = GuidValue(TokenSpaceGuid,
> >> self.Packages, self.MetaFile.Path)
> >>>> - if Value is None:
> >>>> - PackageList =
> >> "\n\t".join(str(P) for P in self.Packages)
> >>>> - EdkLogger.error('build',
> >> RESOURCE_NOT_AVAILABLE,
> >>>> - "Value of Guid
> >> [%s] is not found under [Guids] section in" % TokenSpaceGuid,
> >>>> -
> >> ExtraData=PackageList, File=self.MetaFile, Line=LineNo)
> >>>> - self.Guids[TokenSpaceGuid] = Value
> >>>> -
> >> self._GuidsUsedByPcd[TokenSpaceGuid] = Value
> >>>> CommentRecords =
> >> self._RawData[MODEL_META_DATA_COMMENT, self._Arch, self._Platform, Id]
> >>>> Comments = []
> >>>> for CmtRec in CommentRecords:
> >>>> Comments.append(CmtRec[0])
> >>>> self._PcdComments[TokenSpaceGuid,
> >> PcdCName] = Comments
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.20.1.windows.1
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >
> >
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-29 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-28 9:17 [Patch][edk2-stable201908] BaseTools: Fixed regression issue for building !x86 builds Bob Feng
2019-08-28 14:01 ` [edk2-devel] " Leif Lindholm
2019-08-28 15:22 ` Liming Gao
2019-08-28 18:42 ` Michael D Kinney
2019-08-29 3:15 ` Bob Feng
2019-08-29 14:32 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-08-29 16:00 ` Liming Gao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E4DE483@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox