Hi Benjamin,
I sent an email to Google on your #2 question and got the following response:
Email address, preferred name and legal name are different things. The legal name is what should match the proof of enrollment. The preferred name is what is public (what
mentors will see and will be on the program site if their project is accepted) and preferred name can be whatever the student wishes it to be. This is described on the registration form as well for folks.
Feel free to direct students to our support email gsoc-support@google.com for these types
of questions as well.
Hope that helps.
Thanks,
Nate
From: <devel@edk2.groups.io> on behalf of Nate DeSimone <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
Reply-To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>, "Desimone, Nathaniel L" <nathaniel.l.desimone@intel.com>
Date: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 at 5:00 PM
To: "devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>, "benjamin.doron00@gmail.com" <benjamin.doron00@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] MinPlatform Board port (GSoC 2021)
Hi Benjamin,
Great to meet you and welcome to the TianoCore project! Glad you hear you are interested! Doing a board port to the Acer Aspire VN7-572G laptop sounds like a great GSoC project! I presume that since you already did a coreboot port that
boot guard is disabled on this laptop and you have figured out how to flash images onto it
😊.
The only thing that might be a little challenging is getting a 2nd copy of that laptop for your mentor, so the possibility exists that when it comes to debugging problems you might be a little more on your own than you would
be otherwise. I’m not too worried about that looking at your CB:35523, it seems like you know what you are doing.
For sure our conventions and infrastructure are different, but there are more parallels between MinPlatform and coreboot than might initially meet the eye. For example:
BoardInitBeforeMemoryInit() is roughly equivalent to bootblock_mainboard_init().
BoardInitBeforeSiliconInit() is roughly equivalent to mainboard_init().
SiliconPolicyUpdatePreMem() is roughly equivalent to mainboard_memory_init_params().
FSP Dispatch Mode Policy Init:
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2-platforms/blob/master/Platform/Intel/KabylakeOpenBoardPkg/KabylakeRvp3/Policy/Library/PeiSiliconPolicyUpdateLib/PeiSiliconPolicyUpdateLib.c
FSP API Mode Policy Init:
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2-platforms/blob/master/Platform/Intel/KabylakeOpenBoardPkg/KabylakeRvp3/FspWrapper/Library/PeiSiliconPolicyUpdateLibFsp/PeiFspPolicyUpdateLib.c
I’d recommend only implementing dispatch mode for new boards. We only had the API mode version because we were busy making a version of Kaby Lake FSP that supports dispatch mode (aka AmberLakeFspBinPkg) at the same time we were developing
KabyLakeOpenBoardPkg back in 2019.
One difference is we group our board ports based on the SOC they use. So your new board port would go under Platform/Intel/KabylakeOpenBoardPkg/AspireVn7Dash572G for example.
I will give you the same caution that I gave Pedro that you will need to be careful about IP cross-contamination. Since coreboot is a GPL project and TianoCore is a BSD+Patent project, we can’t use any of their code. So you need to be careful
to NOT read the coreboot Kaby Lake code (with the one exception being your patch to add the VN7-572G, since you are the exclusive author of that work you can choose to re-license it as BSD.) In general, on the days you are doing TianoCore work don’t look at
any coreboot code. That way the cycle of sleep and dreams clears your head of influence.
As to your questions:
Hope this helps and welcome to the project!
With Best Regards,
Nate
From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io>
On Behalf Of Benjamin Doron
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 4:28 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io
Subject: [edk2-devel] MinPlatform Board port (GSoC 2021)
Hi all,
This may be my first time participating in GSoC and contributing to TianoCore. I'm looking to complete the MinPlatform board port task for an Acer Aspire VN7-572G laptop, which is a Skylake-U platform supported by the Kabylake FSP.
I have previously written a coreboot port for the same board, still pending review. I hope the fact that some of the board-level understanding is complete does not preclude me from participating, but many implementation details don't seem to transfer. Also,
I'm looking to learn more about firmware and produce something new. I've made some other contributions to coreboot as well.
I've also previously worked on an EDK2 fork, adding and developing features for UefiPayloadPkg on coreboot (I can link it if anyone wants to see and possibly work on upstreaming my commits a different time).
I have some knowledge of C programming.
Some questions:
I have a technical question or two as well, but they can wait.
Looking forward to working on TianoCore!