From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>, devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
"Jordan Justen" <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 3/5] OvmfPkg: set fixed FlashNvStorage base addresses with -D SMM_REQUIRE
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 17:14:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4a412430-d0a3-6310-0d2d-de2da6c00639@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200311154449.GR23627@bivouac.eciton.net>
On 03/11/20 16:44, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> One comment, not on this patch but prompted by it:
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 23:27:37 +0100, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkg.fdf.inc b/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkg.fdf.inc
>> index 66e0e4d270f5..35fd454b97ab 100644
>> --- a/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkg.fdf.inc
>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/OvmfPkg.fdf.inc
>> @@ -82,4 +82,10 @@
>
> I was surprised at not seeing the section header here, so had a look
> at the file, noticed it doesn't have any. And that all files that
> include it do it by:
>
> [Defines]
> !include OvmfPkg.fdf.inc
>
> That looks a bit error-prone and inflexible - could we move/copy the
> header into this file?
No, please let us not -- I strive to keep all FDF and DSC include files
under OvmfPkg header-free. It gives more flexibility to the includer.
A recent example of this was my request for NetworkPkg to expose its
include snippets header-less, for DSC files. Please see the "!include
NetworkPkg/..." directives in the OVMF DSC files; those are also by
design header-less:
NetworkPkg/NetworkComponents.dsc.inc
NetworkPkg/NetworkDefines.dsc.inc
NetworkPkg/NetworkLibs.dsc.inc
NetworkPkg/NetworkPcds.dsc.inc
NetworkPkg does offer (as a convenience) more "canned" includes too, but
those were not flexible enough for OVMF.
Same for the other FDF include files under OvmfPkg:
- DecomprScratchEnd.fdf.inc
- VarStore.fdf.inc
An example of where this is actively being put to use is
"VarStore.fdf.inc": it is included both under [FD.OVMF], and [FD.OVMF_VARS].
So the treatment of the include files is consistent (I'd not want some
includes with headers, and some without).
I realize the include files under ArmVirtPkg do not follow this pattern
(they contain headers); however, out of the files:
- ArmVirt.dsc.inc
- ArmVirtQemuFvMain.fdf.inc
- ArmVirtRules.fdf.inc
- VarStore.fdf.inc
the first and the third contain *multiple* headers, so the application
area is arguably different.
Thanks,
Laszlo
>
> /
> Leif
>
>> SET gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdOvmfFlashNvStorageFtwSpareBase = gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdOvmfFlashNvStorageFtwWorkingBase + gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdFlashNvStorageFtwWorkingSize
>> SET gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdFlashNvStorageFtwSpareSize = $(VARS_SPARE_SIZE)
>>
>> +!if $(SMM_REQUIRE) == TRUE
>> +SET gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdFlashNvStorageVariableBase64 = gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdOvmfFlashNvStorageVariableBase
>> +SET gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdFlashNvStorageFtwWorkingBase = gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdOvmfFlashNvStorageFtwWorkingBase
>> +SET gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdFlashNvStorageFtwSpareBase = gUefiOvmfPkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdOvmfFlashNvStorageFtwSpareBase
>> +!endif
>> +
>> DEFINE MEMFD_BASE_ADDRESS = 0x800000
>> --
>> 2.19.1.3.g30247aa5d201
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-11 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-10 22:27 [PATCH 0/5] OvmfPkg: improve SMM comms security with adaptive MemoryTypeInformation Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-10 22:27 ` [PATCH 1/5] OvmfPkg/QemuFlashFvbServicesRuntimeDxe: drop unused PCDs Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-10 22:27 ` [PATCH 2/5] OvmfPkg/QemuFlashFvbServices: factor out SetPcdFlashNvStorageBaseAddresses Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-10 22:27 ` [PATCH 3/5] OvmfPkg: set fixed FlashNvStorage base addresses with -D SMM_REQUIRE Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-11 15:44 ` [edk2-devel] " Leif Lindholm
2020-03-11 16:14 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2020-03-11 16:20 ` Leif Lindholm
2020-03-11 16:41 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-12 14:20 ` Leif Lindholm
2020-03-12 22:19 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-10 22:27 ` [PATCH 4/5] OvmfPkg: include FaultTolerantWritePei and VariablePei " Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-10 22:27 ` [PATCH 5/5] OvmfPkg: improve SMM comms security with adaptive MemoryTypeInformation Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-11 16:00 ` [edk2-devel] " Leif Lindholm
2020-03-11 16:22 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-11 19:36 ` Leif Lindholm
2020-03-12 0:30 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-03-12 10:40 ` Leif Lindholm
2020-03-12 21:19 ` Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4a412430-d0a3-6310-0d2d-de2da6c00639@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox