From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lersek@redhat.com>
Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom;
client-ip=209.132.183.28; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=lersek@redhat.com;
receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3CEC211E0931
for <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
[10.5.11.15])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B63B180470;
Wed, 20 Mar 2019 20:03:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-120-169.rdu2.redhat.com
[10.10.120.169])
by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D495D70A;
Wed, 20 Mar 2019 20:03:24 +0000 (UTC)
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@citrix.com>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>,
Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com>,
=?UTF-8?Q?Marc-Andr=c3=a9_Lureau?= <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
References: <E92EE9817A31E24EB0585FDF735412F5B9C6850A@ORSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com>
<f2a32071-868a-e4fa-dcca-41bf28ba93aa@redhat.com>
<6de07821-a05e-9446-7ef6-c178eaf2fdfb@arm.com>
<8F40F2BF-B40F-4338-A832-70AE84B26408@citrix.com>
<b897ca36-ebde-094c-ba18-6b1d2773d210@arm.com>
<6FBC013D-4BC9-454C-9D4D-87C96F435704@citrix.com>
<fb6e7770-b336-828a-7016-9b43d816a79d@arm.com>
<C2A0176C-8197-421A-9CA9-2B416DF17EAB@citrix.com>
<720E0EE9-2AED-4110-827D-B87DE5F52862@citrix.com>
<2439277a-b103-50d4-4de2-f1d3e17c53a3@redhat.com>
<de78bacc-1b4c-c703-c5b0-6ddfd531c5aa@arm.com>
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <4dec63ed-f3c4-4d47-3378-55d62fc932f0@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 21:03:23 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <de78bacc-1b4c-c703-c5b0-6ddfd531c5aa@arm.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16
(mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Wed, 20 Mar 2019 20:03:29 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: PATCH] Change EDK II to BSD+Patent License
X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: EDK II Development <edk2-devel.lists.01.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/options/edk2-devel>,
<mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel>,
<mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 20:03:32 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On 03/20/19 19:42, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 20/03/2019 18:25, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>> On 03/20/19 14:03, Lars Kurth wrote:
>>> On 15/03/2019, 17:48, "Lars Kurth" <lars.kurth@citrix.com> wrote:
>>> On 15/03/2019, 10:18, "Julien Grall" <julien.grall@arm.com> wrote:
>>> Is the issue that you don’t trust that the license specified in the
>>> files are correct?
>>
>> No -- the question is whether the license included in the files
>> mentioned is indeed the MIT license, suitable for a replacement with the
>> appropriate SPDX license ID.
>>
>>>
>>> > (2.2.2) Files that seem to be covered by the MIT license.
>>> >
>>> > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/arch-arm/xen.h
>>>
>>> I can't identify where in the Xen tree this file came from. There is
>>> no corresponding xen.h file in the Xen tree at [xen.git] / xen /
>>> include / public / arch-arm /
>>> @Julien, @Anthony: can you clarify
>>
>> This file was first added to edk2 in b94c3ac93d57 ("Ovmf/Xen: implement
>> XenHypercallLib for ARM", 2015-02-28).
>
> It is a copy of public/arch-arm.h. Somehow all the other projects
> created the file under arch-arm/xen.h.
>
>>
>> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/commit/b94c3ac93d57
>>
>> And from the Xen project (I think), it was Reviewed-by: Stefano
>> Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>. (I vaguely recall that
>> Stefano's emai has changed since.)
>
> That's correct. He is working for Xilinx now.
>
>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/arch-x86/xen-x86_32.h
>>> >
>>> OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/arch-x86/xen-x86_64.h
>>> > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/arch-x86/xen.h
>>> > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/event_channel.h
>>> > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/grant_table.h
>>> > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/hvm/hvm_op.h
>>> > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/hvm/params.h
>>> > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/io/blkif.h
>>> > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/io/console.h
>>> > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/io/protocols.h
>>> > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/io/ring.h
>>> > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/io/xenbus.h
>>> > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/io/xs_wire.h
>>> > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/memory.h
>>> > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/xen-compat.h
>>> > OvmfPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/Xen/xen.h
>>>
>>> These all appear to originate from [xen.git] / xen / include / public
>>> In the Xen tree these all have explicit MIT licenses, which implies
>>> that the license headers are indeed correct.
>>
>> Thanks -- so can we replace the license blocks with
>>
>> SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
>>
>> ? (See e.g. <https://spdx.org/ids-how>.)
>
> I spoke with Lars today, this identifier would be suitable for the headers.
>
> Cheers,
>
Thanks!
Laszlo