From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <lersek@redhat.com>
Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom;
 client-ip=66.187.233.73; helo=mx1.redhat.com; envelope-from=lersek@redhat.com;
 receiver=edk2-devel@lists.01.org 
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by ml01.01.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17DC72111FE7B
 for <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>; Thu,  6 Sep 2018 11:15:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com
 [10.11.54.4])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0A0D40853F5;
 Thu,  6 Sep 2018 18:15:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-120-62.rdu2.redhat.com
 [10.10.120.62])
 by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B745D2026D68;
 Thu,  6 Sep 2018 18:15:27 +0000 (UTC)
To: "Carsey, Jaben" <jaben.carsey@intel.com>,
 Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
 "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>, "Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
 "Zeng, Star" <star.zeng@intel.com>,
 "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
 "Zhang, Chao B" <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
References: <20180906134523.2036-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
 <20180906134523.2036-5-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
 <1687b7c4-4bce-d184-8e23-d156d3a4a9df@redhat.com>
 <CAKv+Gu_njxx69QyUi72RJfd9V4fvrs02VMUS5k_hkPO9iKTTVw@mail.gmail.com>
 <C76D9188-857F-4F1E-A52C-5CFB38029644@intel.com>
From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <51d5e585-04c6-2c64-7eb2-d151d98e3242@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 20:15:26 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <C76D9188-857F-4F1E-A52C-5CFB38029644@intel.com>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.4
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16
 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.5]); Thu, 06 Sep 2018 18:15:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.5]);
 Thu, 06 Sep 2018 18:15:29 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.4'
 DOMAIN:'int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com'
 HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'lersek@redhat.com' RCPT:''
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] EdkCompatibilityPkg: remove PE/COFF header workaround for ELILO on IPF
X-BeenThere: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: EDK II Development  <edk2-devel.lists.01.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/options/edk2-devel>,
 <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
List-Help: <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel>,
 <mailto:edk2-devel-request@lists.01.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 18:15:30 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

On 09/06/18 20:01, Carsey, Jaben wrote:
> We have a BZ to remove the compatibility package... I’d call updating it redundant and not worth your time.

Ah, very good point!

https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1103

Laszlo