From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>, devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>, Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>,
Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>, Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>,
Debkumar De <debkumar.de@intel.com>,
Harry Han <harry.han@intel.com>,
Catharine West <catharine.west@intel.com>,
Qi Zhang <qi1.zhang@intel.com>,
Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>, Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Maintainers.txt: Add reviewers for security features.
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 15:41:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <535d4a36-c866-e653-ea08-bb77ca92d8d5@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200601080755.579-1-eric.dong@intel.com>
Hi Eric,
On 06/01/20 10:07, Eric Dong wrote:
> Add reviewers to review security related changes.
> Impacted below modules:
>
> MdeModulePkg: Pei Core
> F: MdeModulePkg/Core/Pei/
>
> SecurityPkg: Tcg related modules
> F: SecurityPkg/Tcg/
>
> SecurityPkg: Secure boot related modules
> F: SecurityPkg/Library/DxeImageVerificationLib/
> F: SecurityPkg/VariableAuthenticated/SecureBootConfigDxe/
> F: SecurityPkg/Library/AuthVariableLib/
>
> UefiCpuPkg: Sec related modules
> F: UefiCpuPkg/SecCore/
> F: UefiCpuPkg/ResetVector/
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> Cc: Hao A Wu <hao.a.wu@intel.com>
> Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> Cc: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
> Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
> Cc: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Cc: Debkumar De <debkumar.de@intel.com>
> Cc: Harry Han <harry.han@intel.com>
> Cc: Catharine West <catharine.west@intel.com>
> Cc: Qi Zhang <qi1.zhang@intel.com>
> Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
> Cc: Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>
> ---
> Maintainers.txt | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
This patch should be split in at least 3 parts (one per package). Maybe
even 4 parts (if we want to keep the TCG vs. Secure Boot section update
separate).
There are two reasons for this:
(1) Better review granularity.
For a (random!) example, Debkumar De is not added under SecurityPkg,
therefore Debkumar should not be forced to look at the SecurityPkg
hunks. But now that's a problem, because the patch contains everything.
(2) Such patches are actually code. They influence how
"BaseTools/Scripts/GetMaintainer.py works.
For example, when you introduce "MdeModulePkg: Pei Core" as a separate
subsystem, I have to verify that you also remove it from under
"MdeModulePkg: Core services (PEI, DXE and Runtime) modules".
In addition, I review that Dandan and Liming *remain* reviewers for the
PEI Core (because they are listed under "MdeModulePkg: Core services
(PEI, DXE and Runtime) modules" as well), and that Debkumar, Harry and
Catharine are *new* reviewers. I also have to check that the resultant
reviewer list, for the new "MdeModulePkg: Pei Core" subsystem does not
overlap with the general MdeModulePkg owners (Jian, Hao).
So that's all good, but it's complex enough that I really don't want to
handle *multiple packages* in this regard in a single patch. The same
procedure has to be done for SecurityPkg and UefiCpuPkg as well (on the
reviewer side), and having them all in a single patch makes the review
needlessly difficult.
So split this up please.
Thanks
Laszlo
>
> diff --git a/Maintainers.txt b/Maintainers.txt
> index 76f336b7dc..4f316cfc60 100644
> --- a/Maintainers.txt
> +++ b/Maintainers.txt
> @@ -258,6 +258,14 @@ F: MdeModulePkg/Universal/Console/
> R: Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>
> R: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
>
> +MdeModulePkg: Pei Core
> +F: MdeModulePkg/Core/Pei/
> +R: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
> +R: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
> +R: Debkumar De <debkumar.de@intel.com>
> +R: Harry Han <harry.han@intel.com>
> +R: Catharine West <catharine.west@intel.com>
> +
> MdeModulePkg: Core services (PEI, DXE and Runtime) modules
> F: MdeModulePkg/*Mem*/
> F: MdeModulePkg/*SectionExtract*/
> @@ -265,7 +273,6 @@ F: MdeModulePkg/*StatusCode*/
> F: MdeModulePkg/Application/DumpDynPcd/
> F: MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/
> F: MdeModulePkg/Core/DxeIplPeim/
> -F: MdeModulePkg/Core/Pei/
> F: MdeModulePkg/Core/RuntimeDxe/
> F: MdeModulePkg/Include/*Mem*.h
> F: MdeModulePkg/Include/*Pcd*.h
> @@ -463,6 +470,17 @@ M: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> M: Jian J Wang <jian.j.wang@intel.com>
> R: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zhang@intel.com>
>
> +SecurityPkg: Tcg related modules
> +F: SecurityPkg/Tcg/
> +R: Qi Zhang <qi1.zhang@intel.com>
> +R: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
> +
> +SecurityPkg: Secure boot related modules
> +F: SecurityPkg/Library/DxeImageVerificationLib/
> +F: SecurityPkg/VariableAuthenticated/SecureBootConfigDxe/
> +F: SecurityPkg/Library/AuthVariableLib/
> +R: Min Xu <min.m.xu@intel.com>
> +
> ShellPkg
> F: ShellPkg/
> W: https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/ShellPkg
> @@ -486,6 +504,14 @@ W: https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/UefiCpuPkg
> M: Eric Dong <eric.dong@intel.com>
> M: Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
> R: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> +R: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.kumar@intel.com>
> +
> +UefiCpuPkg: Sec related modules
> +F: UefiCpuPkg/SecCore/
> +F: UefiCpuPkg/ResetVector/
> +R: Debkumar De <debkumar.de@intel.com>
> +R: Harry Han <harry.han@intel.com>
> +R: Catharine West <catharine.west@intel.com>
>
> UefiPayloadPkg
> F: UefiPayloadPkg/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-02 13:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-01 8:07 [PATCH] Maintainers.txt: Add reviewers for security features Dong, Eric
2020-06-02 13:41 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2020-06-02 14:56 ` [edk2-devel] " Dong, Eric
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=535d4a36-c866-e653-ea08-bb77ca92d8d5@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox