From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: gaoliming <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
devel@edk2.groups.io, announce@edk2.groups.io,
'Andrew Fish' <afish@apple.com>,
leif@nuviainc.com,
'Michael D Kinney' <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: 'Soumya Guptha' <soumya.k.guptha@intel.com>,
ray.ni@intel.com, w.sheng@intel.com,
'Ming Huang' <huangming@linux.alibaba.com>,
jiewen.yao@intel.com
Subject: Re: 回复: [edk2-devel] Soft Feature Freeze starts now for edk2-stable202102
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 16:28:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <53959bcb-45c6-5237-0597-b1f789d10796@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <00bf01d70c08$661b0f00$32512d00$@byosoft.com.cn>
Hi Liming,
On 02/26/21 07:27, gaoliming wrote:
> Hi, Stewards and All:
>
> So far, there are still three patch sets to be requested to catch this
> stable tag. They are bug fixes, and pass code review in soft feature freeze
> phase. Have you any comments for them?
>
>
>
> 1. Fix two issue in ArmGicLib
> (https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/72175)
>
> 2. Fix CET shadow stack token busy bit clear issue
> (https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/71864)
>
> [Liming] this version uses DB for the instruction. BZ
> https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3227 is create for future
> enhancement.
>
> 3. Use XADD to avoid lock acquire/release
> (https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/71516)
I agree that the first two patch sets are bugfixes, but I'm not entirely
convinced the third one is a bugfix as well -- it is a performance
optimization, to my understanding. Without that patch set, there is no
misbehavior, things are just slower.
The bugfixes can be merged of course; I wouldn't merge the 3rd series
however.
... I can see Ray pushed the first patch of the third series:
<https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/72249>
I disagree with that. Here's an excerpt from the commit message:
With this patch, OVMF when running in a 255 threads QEMU spends about
one second to wakeup all APs. Original implementation needs more than
10 seconds.
I wouldn't call the pre-patch behavior a bug.
And the review for "[PATCH v3 1/4] UefiCpuPkg/MpInitLib: Use XADD to
avoid lock acquire/release" only arrived (from Mike) after the SFF, so I
don't think it should have been pushed.
On the other hand, I also won't ask for a revert.
Thanks
Laszlo
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Liming
>
> 发件人: bounce+27952+71922+4905953+8761045@groups.io
> <bounce+27952+71922+4905953+8761045@groups.io> 代表 gaoliming
> 发送时间: 2021年2月22日 16:23
> 收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io; announce@edk2.groups.io
> 抄送: 'Andrew Fish' <afish@apple.com>; 'Laszlo Ersek' <lersek@redhat.com>;
> leif@nuviainc.com; 'Michael D Kinney' <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; 'Soumya
> Guptha' <soumya.k.guptha@intel.com>
> 主题: [edk2-devel] Soft Feature Freeze starts now for edk2-stable202102
>
>
>
> Hi, all
>
> We will enter into Soft Feature Freeze phase. In this phase, the feature
> under review will not be allowed to be merged. The feature passed review can
> still be merged.
>
>
>
> The patch review can continue without break in edk2 community. If the patch
> is sent before Soft Feature Freeze, and plans to catch this stable tag, the
> patch contributor need reply to his patch and notify edk2 community. If the
> patch is sent after Soft Feature Freeze, and plans to catch this stable tag,
> please add edk2-stable202102 key words in the patch title and BZ, so the
> community know this patch target and give the feedback.
>
>
>
> Below is edk2-stable202102 tag planning
> https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/EDK-II-Release-Plannin
> g Proposed Schedule
>
> Date (00:00:00 UTC-8) Description
>
> 2020-11-27 Beginning of development
>
> 2021-02-15 Feature Planning Freeze
>
> 2021-02-22 Soft Feature Freeze
>
> 2021-03-01 Hard Feature Freeze
>
> 2021-03-05 Release
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Liming
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-01 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <16660439D2A488A3.5517@groups.io>
2021-02-26 6:27 ` 回复: [edk2-devel] Soft Feature Freeze starts now for edk2-stable202102 gaoliming
2021-03-01 15:28 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2021-03-01 18:30 ` [EXTERNAL] " Bret Barkelew
2021-02-22 8:22 gaoliming
2021-02-22 20:28 ` [edk2-devel] " PierreGondois
2021-02-23 0:55 ` 回复: " gaoliming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=53959bcb-45c6-5237-0597-b1f789d10796@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox