From: "Fan, Jeff" <jeff.fan@intel.com>
To: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>,
"edk2-devel@ml01.01.org" <edk2-devel@ml01.01.org>
Cc: "Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>,
"Yao, Jiewen" <jiewen.yao@intel.com>,
"Tian, Feng" <feng.tian@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Clear some semaphores on S3 boot path
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 00:43:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <542CF652F8836A4AB8DBFAAD40ED192A4A2EB3A8@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b9d6e3d0-4c7c-66fd-2ce9-0ecff0bda130@redhat.com>
Laszlo,
Thanks your comments. I added my comments as below in [Jeff]
Thanks!
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:lersek@redhat.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 4:49 AM
To: Fan, Jeff; edk2-devel@ml01.01.org
Cc: Kinney, Michael D; Yao, Jiewen; Tian, Feng
Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Clear some semaphores on S3 boot path
On 11/29/16 08:51, Jeff Fan wrote:
> Some semaphores are not cleared on S3 boot path. For example,
> mSmmMpSyncData->CpuData[CpuIndex].Present. It may still keeps the
> mSmmMpSyncData->value set at
> SMM runtime during S3 resume. It may causes BSP have the wrong
> judgement on SMM AP's present state.
>
> We have one related fix at e78a2a49ee6b0c0d7c6997c87ace31d7761cf636.
> But that is not completed.
>
> This fix is to clear Busy/Run/Present semaphores in InitializeMpSyncData().
>
> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Cc: Feng Tian <feng.tian@intel.com>
> Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen.yao@intel.com>
> Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Fan <jeff.fan@intel.com>
> ---
> UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/MpService.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/MpService.c
> b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/MpService.c
> index cfbf59e..a873b68 100644
> --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/MpService.c
> +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/MpService.c
> @@ -1357,6 +1357,9 @@ InitializeMpSyncData (
> (UINT32 *)((UINTN)mSmmCpuSemaphores.SemaphoreCpu.Run + mSemaphoreSize * CpuIndex);
> mSmmMpSyncData->CpuData[CpuIndex].Present =
> (BOOLEAN *)((UINTN)mSmmCpuSemaphores.SemaphoreCpu.Present +
> mSemaphoreSize * CpuIndex);
> + *(mSmmMpSyncData->CpuData[CpuIndex].Busy) = 0;
> + *(mSmmMpSyncData->CpuData[CpuIndex].Run) = 0;
> + *(mSmmMpSyncData->CpuData[CpuIndex].Present) = FALSE;
> }
> }
> }
>
Even after this patch, the values pointed-to by the following fields of SemaphoreGlobal are not cleared: PFLock, CodeAccessCheckLock, MemoryMappedLock. Is that okay?
The values pointed-to by the following fields of SemaphoreMsr are not cleared either: Msr, AvailableCounter. Is that okay?
[Jeff] We need to clear the data in SMM_CPU_DATA_BLOCK/SMM_DISPATCHER_MP_SYNC_DATA and semaphores pointed by the field in those 2 structures. However, the other spinlock located in SemaphoreBlock needn't to be cleared.
Can we imitate e78a2a49ee6b0c0d7c6997c87ace31d7761cf636 here; namely, can we save "SemaphoreBlock" and "TotalSize" from
InitializeSmmCpuSemaphores() in global variables (in SMRAM), and then just do another ZeroMem() here? That would cover the currently listed objects (*Counter, *InsideSmm, *AllCpusInSync), and everything else too, in a future-proof way.
[Jeff] This issue is that ZeroMem only clear all the fields in structure and needn't o clear the buffer pointed by these fields.
In fact, I wonder if the ZeroMem() could be moved into
InitializeMpSyncData() from InitializeSmmCpuSemaphores().
[Jeff] If we cleared all semaphores(including Spinlock), we need to re-initialize them again. I do not think there is some reasonable usage case to let spinlock keep the garbage value.
Of course, if some pointed-to objects must not be cleared, then the
ZeroMem() is not appropriate.
[Jeff] Agree.
Thanks!
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-30 0:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-29 7:51 [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm: Clear some semaphores on S3 boot path Jeff Fan
2016-11-29 20:48 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-11-30 0:43 ` Fan, Jeff [this message]
2016-11-30 8:47 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-12-01 2:53 ` Tian, Feng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=542CF652F8836A4AB8DBFAAD40ED192A4A2EB3A8@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox