From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Olovyannikov <vladimir.olovyannikov@broadcom.com>,
"Rabeda, Maciej" <maciej.rabeda@linux.intel.com>,
devel@edk2.groups.io, Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>,
Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
Cc: Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud <Samer.El-Haj-Mahmoud@arm.com>,
Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>, Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>,
Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>, Nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/1] ShellPkg/DynamicCommand: add HttpDynamicCommand
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 12:50:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5534f1de-b9b7-0981-e8c6-de0e4c25c617@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9e78b422f6db992bf857d19cc64417a@mail.gmail.com>
On 09/08/20 23:04, Vladimir Olovyannikov wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>> Sent: Monday, September 7, 2020 2:37 AM
>> To: Vladimir Olovyannikov <vladimir.olovyannikov@broadcom.com>;
>> Rabeda, Maciej <maciej.rabeda@linux.intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io;
>> Zhichao Gao <zhichao.gao@intel.com>; Ray Ni <ray.ni@intel.com>
>> Cc: Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud <Samer.El-Haj-Mahmoud@arm.com>; Jiaxin Wu
>> <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>; Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>; Liming Gao
>> <liming.gao@intel.com>; Nd <nd@arm.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/1] ShellPkg/DynamicCommand: add
>> HttpDynamicCommand
>>
>> On 09/04/20 19:55, Vladimir Olovyannikov wrote:
>>
>>> There is also another issue with the TimebaseLib: inconsistency in
>>> return values of the EfiTimeToEpoch (returns UINT32, should return
>>> UINTN, as Zhichao pointed out earlier in the previous
>>> HttpDynamicCommand patchset).
>>> If this one is fixed, I can just use the TimeBaseLib.h header for
>>> constants.
>>
>> Consuming TimeBaseLib.h in this patch would be really nice.
> OK, if this can be fixed, I will definitely use TimeBaseLib.h header for
> constants, and will drop
> duplicate definitions in Http.c/Http.h
>>
>> There are two EfiTimeToEpoch() call sites in edk2:
>>
>> ArmPlatformPkg/Library/PL031RealTimeClockLib/PL031RealTimeClockLib.c
>> EmbeddedPkg/Library/VirtualRealTimeClockLib/VirtualRealTimeClockLib.c
>>
>> The latter stores the return value in a UINTN variable, so that seems OK.
>> The
>> former is a bit messier, but it seems to ensure that the result fits in 32
>> bits for
>> HW reasons anyway:
>>
>> // Because the PL031 is a 32-bit counter counting seconds,
>> // the maximum time span is just over 136 years.
>> // Time is stored in Unix Epoch format, so it starts in 1970,
>> // Therefore it can not exceed the year 2106.
>> if ((Time->Year < 1970) || (Time->Year >= 2106)) {
>> return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
>> }
>> ...
>> EpochSeconds = EfiTimeToEpoch (Time);
>> ...
>> MmioWrite32 (mPL031RtcBase + PL031_RTC_LR_LOAD_REGISTER,
>> EpochSeconds);
>>
>> So I think we'd need two patches:
>>
>> (1) add an explicit (UINT32) cast to the EfiTimeToEpoch() call in
>> "ArmPlatformPkg/Library/PL031RealTimeClockLib/PL031RealTimeClockLib.c",
>>
>> (2) change the return value to UINTN in
>> "EmbeddedPkg/Include/Library/TimeBaseLib.h" and
>> "EmbeddedPkg/Library/TimeBaseLib/TimeBaseLib.c".
>>
>> Hmm wait... There are five more call sites in edk2-platforms. :( OK, I
>> give up
>> here. Sorry.
> OK, so what are the next steps, what do you suggest?
You'd have to audit, and if necessary, clean up, the EfiTimeToEpoch()
call sites in edk2-platforms. And you'd need to establish a global order
between the patch series (plural) such that both edk2 and edk2-platforms
should build at any stage across those series.
Thanks
Laszlo
> I saw today that unused macros like SEC_PER_MONTH, etc. were removed from
> TimeBaseLib.h.
>
> Thank you,
> Vladimir
>>
>> Laszlo
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-09 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-02 4:08 [PATCH v10 0/1] ShellPkg/DynamicCommand: add HttpDynamicCommand Vladimir Olovyannikov
2020-09-02 4:08 ` [PATCH v10 1/1] " Vladimir Olovyannikov
2020-09-04 13:10 ` Maciej Rabeda
2020-09-04 15:20 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-09-04 17:55 ` Vladimir Olovyannikov
2020-09-07 9:36 ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-09-08 21:04 ` Vladimir Olovyannikov
2020-09-09 10:50 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2020-09-09 17:15 ` Vladimir Olovyannikov
2020-09-10 6:25 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5534f1de-b9b7-0981-e8c6-de0e4c25c617@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox