public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "wenyi,xie" <xiewenyi2@huawei.com>
To: "Feng, Bob C" <bob.c.feng@intel.com>,
	"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
	"gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn" <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>,
	"Chen, Christine" <yuwei.chen@intel.com>
Cc: "songdongkuang@huawei.com" <songdongkuang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH EDK2 v1 1/1] BaseTools/EfiRom: remove redundant checking of argc
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:01:11 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <554b1537-ca5d-08c9-0f56-f68f99da8de2@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB40739A8730032B184DE58ED6C9C60@DM6PR11MB4073.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

OK, I will change the checking to if (Argc == 1)

Thanks
Wenyi

On 2020/12/15 11:50, Feng, Bob C wrote:
> Yes, argc < 1 will always be false, but I think this block should not be removed because it's used to check if the parameter is invalid. I think the correct checking should be "if (Argc == 1)"  or  "if (Argc < 2)"
> 
> Thanks,
> Bob
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of wenyi,xie via groups.io
> Sent: Friday, December 11, 2020 10:32 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Feng, Bob C <bob.c.feng@intel.com>; gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn; Chen, Christine <yuwei.chen@intel.com>
> Cc: songdongkuang@huawei.com; xiewenyi2@huawei.com
> Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH EDK2 v1 1/1] BaseTools/EfiRom: remove redundant checking of argc
> 
> As the condition of while statement is argc > 0, so argc < 1 will always be false, it's redundant.
> 
> Cc: Bob Feng <bob.c.feng@intel.com>
> Cc: Liming Gao <gaoliming@byosoft.com.cn>
> Cc: Yuwei Chen <yuwei.chen@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wenyi Xie <xiewenyi2@huawei.com>
> ---
>  BaseTools/Source/C/EfiRom/EfiRom.c | 10 ----------
>  1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/BaseTools/Source/C/EfiRom/EfiRom.c b/BaseTools/Source/C/EfiRom/EfiRom.c
> index a7e2839b0a84..147eb464b01e 100644
> --- a/BaseTools/Source/C/EfiRom/EfiRom.c
> +++ b/BaseTools/Source/C/EfiRom/EfiRom.c
> @@ -1010,16 +1010,6 @@ Returns:
>  
>          OptionName = Argv[0];
>  
> -        //
> -        // Device IDs specified with -i
> -        // Make sure there's at least one more parameter
> -        //
> -        if (Argc < 1) {
> -          Error (NULL, 0, 2000, "Invalid parameter", "Missing Device Id with %s option!", OptionName);
> -          ReturnStatus = 1;
> -          goto Done;
> -        }
> -
>          //
>          // Process until another dash-argument parameter or the end of the list
>          //
> --
> 2.20.1.windows.1
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> .
> 

      reply	other threads:[~2020-12-15  4:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-11  2:31 [PATCH EDK2 v1 0/1] BaseTools/EfiRom: remove redundant checking of argc wenyi,xie
2020-12-11  2:31 ` [PATCH EDK2 v1 1/1] " wenyi,xie
2020-12-15  3:50   ` [edk2-devel] " Bob Feng
2020-12-15  4:01     ` wenyi,xie [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=554b1537-ca5d-08c9-0f56-f68f99da8de2@huawei.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox