public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, maciej.rabeda@linux.intel.com
Cc: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>, Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>,
	Seven.ding@lcfuturecenter.com
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1] NetworkPkg/UefiPxeBcDxe: Fix PXE_BOOT_SERVERS usage in boot info parse flow
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 21:20:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <590e1de9-9f8c-72df-205e-c767f788ecf3@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2dde2087-e291-0232-62e2-a30cdf4e09b2@redhat.com>

On 08/19/20 20:13, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> On 08/19/20 18:53, Maciej Rabeda wrote:
>> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2876
>>
>> According to PXE 2.1 spec, DHCP option 43, tag 6 (PXE_DISCOVERY_CONTROL),
>> bit 3 specifies whether PXE client should use/accept TFTP servers defined
>> within PXE_BOOT_SERVERS list (tag 8). This bit was not being taken into
>> account when choosing boot server IP in PxeBcDhcp4BootInfo().
>>
>> Cc: Jiaxin Wu <jiaxin.wu@intel.com>
>> Cc: Siyuan Fu <siyuan.fu@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Maciej Rabeda <maciej.rabeda@linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  NetworkPkg/UefiPxeBcDxe/PxeBcBoot.c | 10 +++++++---
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/NetworkPkg/UefiPxeBcDxe/PxeBcBoot.c b/NetworkPkg/UefiPxeBcDxe/PxeBcBoot.c
>> index d062a526077b..ed9bca0f7de3 100644
>> --- a/NetworkPkg/UefiPxeBcDxe/PxeBcBoot.c
>> +++ b/NetworkPkg/UefiPxeBcDxe/PxeBcBoot.c
>> @@ -499,12 +499,16 @@ PxeBcDhcp4BootInfo (
>>  
>>    //
>>    // Parse the boot server address.
>> -  // If prompt/discover is disabled, get the first boot server from the boot servers list.
>> -  // Otherwise, parse the boot server Ipv4 address from next server address field in DHCP header.
>> +  // If prompt/discover is disabled, server list should be used and is present (DHCP option 43),
>> +  // get the first boot server from the boot servers list.
>> +  // Otherwise, parse the boot server IPv4 address from next server address field in DHCP header.
>>    // If all these fields are not available, use option 54 instead.
>>    //
>>    VendorOpt = &Cache4->VendorOpt;
>> -  if (IS_DISABLE_PROMPT_MENU (VendorOpt->DiscoverCtrl) && IS_VALID_BOOT_SERVERS (VendorOpt->BitMap)) {
>> +  if (IS_DISABLE_PROMPT_MENU (VendorOpt->DiscoverCtrl) &&
>> +      IS_VALID_BOOT_SERVERS (VendorOpt->BitMap) &&
>> +      IS_ENABLE_USE_SERVER_LIST (VendorOpt->DiscoverCtrl))
>> +  {
>>      Entry = VendorOpt->BootSvr;
>>      if (VendorOpt->BootSvrLen >= sizeof (PXEBC_BOOT_SVR_ENTRY) && Entry->IpCnt > 0) {
>>        CopyMem (
>>
> 
> I'm still undecided whether option#43 / tag#6 / bit#3 being clear means
> we should *ignore* PXE_BOOT_SERVERS (tag#8), but I'm willing to defer to
> you on that. So, I can give a cautious
> 
> Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> 
> for this patch.
> 
> Regarding the feature freeze -- in theory, this is a bugfix. However,
> before we merge it, it would be really nice to get feedback from the
> original reporter (CC'd).
> 
> I also intend to regression-test this patch, I'll report back.

I've repeated my usual PXEv4 boot tests (using OVMF IA32X64 and
ArmVirtQemu AARCH64 guests, covering shim + grub + vmlinuz + initrd);
nothing seems to have regressed.

Regression-tested-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>

Thanks
Laszlo


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-19 19:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-19 16:53 [PATCH v1] NetworkPkg/UefiPxeBcDxe: Fix PXE_BOOT_SERVERS usage in boot info parse flow Maciej Rabeda
2020-08-19 18:13 ` [edk2-devel] " Laszlo Ersek
2020-08-19 18:46   ` Michael Brown
2020-08-21 11:19     ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-08-23 16:24       ` Michael Brown
2020-08-19 19:20   ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2020-08-20 10:44     ` Maciej Rabeda
2020-08-20 13:41       ` Michael Brown
2020-08-21  9:11         ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-08-21 10:57           ` 回复: " Ding, Seven
2020-08-21 11:15           ` Maciej Rabeda
2020-08-20  3:35 ` Siyuan, Fu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=590e1de9-9f8c-72df-205e-c767f788ecf3@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox