From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] GSoC 2021 (MinPlatform, Ext2, ACPICA, etc) To: Nate DeSimone ,devel@edk2.groups.io From: "Pedro Falcato" X-Originating-Location: Seixal, District of Setúbal, PT (85.241.253.151) X-Originating-Platform: Linux Chrome 89 User-Agent: GROUPS.IO Web Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 13:43:26 -0700 References: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <591.1617223406718876052@groups.io> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bYzTcDwZm74sSWrKoVtQ" --bYzTcDwZm74sSWrKoVtQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Nate, Everything you said sounds great :)) I did end up going with ext4 as a target, as I find it's the more useful a= nd more interesting project, the only thing I'm not too sure of is whether = or not to add write support as one of the project's targets. Anyway, I've just shared my draft with Tianocore, feel free give out some = much wanted(and needed!) feedback! Thanks, Pedro --bYzTcDwZm74sSWrKoVtQ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Nate,

Everything you said sounds great :))
I did end up = going with ext4 as a target, as I find it's the more useful and more intere= sting project, the only thing I'm not too sure of is whether or not to add = write support as one of the project's targets.
Anyway, I've just share= d my draft with Tianocore, feel free give out some much wanted(and needed!)= feedback!

Thanks,

Pedro --bYzTcDwZm74sSWrKoVtQ--