From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: redhat.com, ip: 209.132.183.28, mailfrom: lersek@redhat.com) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by groups.io with SMTP; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 10:32:58 -0700 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22B5581F0D; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:32:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lacos-laptop-7.usersys.redhat.com (ovpn-117-23.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.117.23]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D2B1001B17; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:32:56 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Arm, ArmPlatform, Crypto, Embedded: list internal headers in [Sources] To: Leif Lindholm Cc: edk2-devel-groups-io , Ard Biesheuvel , Jian Wang , Ting Ye References: <20190719164319.9070-1-lersek@redhat.com> <20190722103755.GA11541@bivouac.eciton.net> From: "Laszlo Ersek" Message-ID: <591319a9-eceb-ab39-0ec0-ccd2530b0e58@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:32:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190722103755.GA11541@bivouac.eciton.net> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.27]); Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:32:58 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 07/22/19 12:37, Leif Lindholm wrote: > On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 06:43:15PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> Repo: https://github.com/lersek/edk2.git >> Branch: internal_hdrs >> >> The BaseTools build feature introduced for TianoCore#1804 / in commit >> 1fa6699e6cd4 ("BaseTools: Add a checking for Sources section in INF >> file", 2019-06-10) logs some (non-fatal) warnings about unlisted >> internal header files. List those files explicitly. > > Urgh. > Yeah. I'm still not super comfortable with this duplication of > dependency scanning (as discussed in > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/topic/31866190), but I have to confess > I also don't really care enough to do anything about it. > > So, while I'm tempted to keep the warnings around as a reminder, if > you prefer to get rid of them - for the pat of the series I was cc:d on: > Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm Thanks! Yes, the warnings are an annoyance, and they are valid too. How the INF files are caught / reported is a separate question IMO. Thanks! Laszlo