Is this a right place to discuss EDK2's USB IF implementation?

Is this a right place to discuss EDK2's USB IF implementation?

[Yosuke Katayama1]

Hello,

We have a USB vendor who has a different understanding on USB IF specification from the EDK2's understanding(implementation).

This mismatch was causing a trouble on our products in the past. There is no issue with our ongoing products as we applied a workaround to our BIOS code but we would like to resolve this mismatch fundamentally for future products.

Is this mailing-list a good place to discuss this topic?

Note:
I asked the same question to "laurie0131@users.sourceforge.net" and "questions@tianocore.org" on 2nd Aug and on 10th Aug respectevely but I haven't heard any feedback since then.

Kind regards,

Re: Is this a right place to discuss EDK2's USB IF implementation?

[Andrew Fish]

> On Aug 16, 2016, at 11:42 PM, Yosuke Katayama1 <ykatayama1@lenovo.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> We have a USB vendor who has a different understanding on USB IF specification from the EDK2's understanding(implementation).
> 
> This mismatch was causing a trouble on our products in the past. There is no issue with our ongoing products as we applied a workaround to our BIOS code but we would like to resolve this mismatch fundamentally for future products.
> 
> Is this mailing-list a good place to discuss this topic?
> 

This is the mailing list to discuss potential issues with code, and to review code changes. So feel free to ask your question. 

Thanks,

Andrew Fish

> Note:
> I asked the same question to "laurie0131@users.sourceforge.net" and "questions@tianocore.org" on 2nd Aug and on 10th Aug respectevely but I haven't heard any feedback since then.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel