From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>, edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT] ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtXen: move from Intel to generic BDS
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 11:08:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a2cd371-35e3-2b1d-39d5-129ef71158b4@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171130203114.19464-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
On 11/30/17 21:31, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> ArmVirtXen is the only remaining consumer of ArmPlatformPkg's
> PlatformIntelBdsLib implementation, which is tightly coupled to the
> deprecated Intel BDS. So move ArmVirtXen to the generic BDS as well,
> allowing us to get rid of PlatformIntelBdsLib entirely.
>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> ---
> ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtXen.dsc | 14 +++++++++++---
> ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtXen.fdf | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtXen.dsc b/ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtXen.dsc
> index 11e073287a84..ae43d5990110 100644
> --- a/ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtXen.dsc
> +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtXen.dsc
> @@ -48,8 +48,9 @@ [LibraryClasses]
> TimerLib|ArmPkg/Library/ArmArchTimerLib/ArmArchTimerLib.inf
>
> CapsuleLib|MdeModulePkg/Library/DxeCapsuleLibNull/DxeCapsuleLibNull.inf
> - GenericBdsLib|IntelFrameworkModulePkg/Library/GenericBdsLib/GenericBdsLib.inf
> - PlatformBdsLib|ArmPlatformPkg/Library/PlatformIntelBdsLib/PlatformIntelBdsLib.inf
> + UefiBootManagerLib|MdeModulePkg/Library/UefiBootManagerLib/UefiBootManagerLib.inf
> + BootLogoLib|MdeModulePkg/Library/BootLogoLib/BootLogoLib.inf
> + PlatformBootManagerLib|ArmPkg/Library/PlatformBootManagerLib/PlatformBootManagerLib.inf
> CustomizedDisplayLib|MdeModulePkg/Library/CustomizedDisplayLib/CustomizedDisplayLib.inf
>
> [LibraryClasses.common.UEFI_DRIVER]
> @@ -86,6 +87,7 @@ [PcdsFixedAtBuild.common]
> gArmTokenSpaceGuid.PcdArmArchTimerFreqInHz|0
>
> gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdResetOnMemoryTypeInformationChange|FALSE
> + gEfiMdeModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdBootManagerMenuFile|{ 0x21, 0xaa, 0x2c, 0x46, 0x14, 0x76, 0x03, 0x45, 0x83, 0x6e, 0x8a, 0xb6, 0xf4, 0x66, 0x23, 0x31 }
> gEfiIntelFrameworkModulePkgTokenSpaceGuid.PcdShellFile|{ 0x83, 0xA5, 0x04, 0x7C, 0x3E, 0x9E, 0x1C, 0x4F, 0xAD, 0x65, 0xE0, 0x52, 0x68, 0xD0, 0xB4, 0xD1 }
>
> [PcdsPatchableInModule.common]
> @@ -199,7 +201,13 @@ [Components.common]
> MdeModulePkg/Universal/DevicePathDxe/DevicePathDxe.inf
> MdeModulePkg/Universal/DisplayEngineDxe/DisplayEngineDxe.inf
> MdeModulePkg/Universal/SetupBrowserDxe/SetupBrowserDxe.inf
> - IntelFrameworkModulePkg/Universal/BdsDxe/BdsDxe.inf
> + MdeModulePkg/Universal/BdsDxe/BdsDxe.inf
> + MdeModulePkg/Application/UiApp/UiApp.inf {
> + <LibraryClasses>
> + NULL|MdeModulePkg/Library/DeviceManagerUiLib/DeviceManagerUiLib.inf
> + NULL|MdeModulePkg/Library/BootManagerUiLib/BootManagerUiLib.inf
> + NULL|MdeModulePkg/Library/BootMaintenanceManagerUiLib/BootMaintenanceManagerUiLib.inf
> + }
>
> OvmfPkg/XenBusDxe/XenBusDxe.inf
> OvmfPkg/XenPvBlkDxe/XenPvBlkDxe.inf
> diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtXen.fdf b/ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtXen.fdf
> index 6586ce6be505..50e670254d52 100644
> --- a/ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtXen.fdf
> +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtXen.fdf
> @@ -177,7 +177,8 @@ [FV.FvMain]
> INF MdeModulePkg/Universal/DevicePathDxe/DevicePathDxe.inf
> INF MdeModulePkg/Universal/DisplayEngineDxe/DisplayEngineDxe.inf
> INF MdeModulePkg/Universal/SetupBrowserDxe/SetupBrowserDxe.inf
> - INF IntelFrameworkModulePkg/Universal/BdsDxe/BdsDxe.inf
> + INF MdeModulePkg/Universal/BdsDxe/BdsDxe.inf
> + INF MdeModulePkg/Application/UiApp/UiApp.inf
>
> INF OvmfPkg/XenBusDxe/XenBusDxe.inf
> INF OvmfPkg/XenPvBlkDxe/XenPvBlkDxe.inf
>
The patch looks fine, and I agree that the main thing that should decide
about it is testing by Julien.
Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Thanks!
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-01 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-30 20:31 [PATCH RFT] ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtXen: move from Intel to generic BDS Ard Biesheuvel
2017-12-01 10:08 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2017-12-04 16:15 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-12-04 15:19 ` Julien Grall
2017-12-04 15:52 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-12-04 15:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-12-04 16:08 ` Julien Grall
2017-12-04 16:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5a2cd371-35e3-2b1d-39d5-129ef71158b4@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox