public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: rfc@edk2.groups.io, dandan.bi@intel.com,
	"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: "Dong, Eric" <eric.dong@intel.com>, "Ni, Ray" <ray.ni@intel.com>,
	"Wang, Jian J" <jian.j.wang@intel.com>,
	"Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>,
	"Tan, Ming" <ming.tan@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] MdeModulePkg/StatusCodeHandler: Separate NULL class libraries for Memory and serial handlers from MdeModulePkg/Universal/StatusCodeHandler modules
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2020 14:48:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5defa315-2e22-4697-e4e0-81b990ae11ba@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN6PR11MB1393556738AFCFB0F2A73B20EA9B0@BN6PR11MB1393.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>

On 06/18/20 09:01, Dandan Bi wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2816
> 
> We plan to separate two kinds of NULL class libraries for Memory and serial handlers from MdeModulePkg/Universal/StatusCodeHandler/.../ StatusCodeHandlerPei/RuntimeDxe/Smm modules.
> The benefit we want to gain from this separation is to 1) make the code clear and easy to maintain, 2) make platform flexible to choose any handler library they need, and it also can reduce image size since the unused handlers can be excluded.
> If you have any concern or comments for this separation, please let me know.
> 
> We plan to add new separated NULL class library MemoryStausCodeHandlerLib and SerialStatusCodeHandlerLib with different phase implementation into MdeModulePkg\Library\ directory.
> The main tree structure may like below:
> MdeModulePkg\Library
> |------MemoryStausCodeHandlerLib
> |------|------ PeiMemoryStausCodeHandlerLib.inf
> |------|------ RuntimeDxeMemoryStatusCodeHandlerLib.inf
> |------|------ SmmMemoryStausCodeHandlerLib.inf
> |------SerialStatusCodeHandlerLib
> |------|------ PeiSerialStatusCodeHandlerLib.inf
> |------|------ RuntimeDxeSerialStatusCodeHandlerLib.inf
> |------|------ SmmSerialStatusCodeHandlerLib.inf
> 
> 
> We will update existing platform use cases in edk2 and edk2-platform repo to cover the new NULL class library to make sure this change doesn't impact any platform.
> After this separation, StatusCodeHandler module usage will like below, and it's also very flexible for platform to cover more handler libraries to meet their requirements.
> MdeModulePkg/Universal/StatusCodeHandler/Pei/StatusCodeHandlerPei.inf {
>   <LibraryClasses>
> NULL|MdeModulePkg/Library/MemoryStausCodeHandlerLib/PeiMemoryStausCodeHandlerLib.inf
> NULL|MdeModulePkg/Library/SerialStatusCodeHandlerLib/PeiSerialStatusCodeHandlerLib.inf
>     ...
> }
> 
> MdeModulePkg/Universal/StatusCodeHandler/RuntimeDxe/StatusCodeHandlerRuntimeDxe.inf  {
>   <LibraryClasses>
> NULL|MdeModulePkg/Library/MemoryStausCodeHandlerLib/RuntimeDxeMemoryStausCodeHandlerLib.inf
> NULL|MdeModulePkg/Library/SerialStatusCodeHandlerLib/RuntimeDxeSerialStatusCodeHandlerLib.inf
>     ...
> }
> 
> MdeModulePkg/Universal/StatusCodeHandler/Smm/StatusCodeHandlerSmm.inf {
>   <LibraryClasses>
>     NULL|MdeModulePkg/Library/MemoryStausCodeHandlerLib/SmmMemoryStausCodeHandlerLib.inf
> NULL|MdeModulePkg/Library/SerialStatusCodeHandlerLib/SmmSerialStatusCodeHandlerLib.inf
>     ...
> }

So I assume you're going to remove PcdStatusCodeUseSerial and
PcdStatusCodeUseMemory, and when converting the existent platforms, the
new NULL class resolutions in the DSC files will reflect the specific
PCD values used in those DSC files until then. Is that right?

I'm OK with it.

Thanks
Laszlo


  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-19 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-18  7:01 [edk2-devel] [edk2-rfc] MdeModulePkg/StatusCodeHandler: Separate NULL class libraries for Memory and serial handlers from MdeModulePkg/Universal/StatusCodeHandler modules Dandan Bi
2020-06-19 12:48 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2020-06-22  4:57   ` Dandan Bi
2020-06-22 15:02     ` Laszlo Ersek
2020-06-19 17:29 ` Brian J. Johnson
2020-06-19 18:03   ` Andrew Fish
2020-06-22  7:27     ` Dandan Bi
2020-06-24 20:24       ` Brian J. Johnson
2020-06-25 15:41         ` Dong, Eric
2020-06-25 22:26           ` Brian J. Johnson
2020-06-20  4:30   ` Dong, Eric

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5defa315-2e22-4697-e4e0-81b990ae11ba@redhat.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox