From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: "Gao, Liming" <liming.gao@intel.com>,
"devel@edk2.groups.io" <devel@edk2.groups.io>,
"Kinney, Michael D" <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Cc: Mike Turner <miketur@microsoft.com>,
"Wang, Jian J" <jian.j.wang@intel.com>,
"Wu, Hao A" <hao.a.wu@intel.com>,
"Bi, Dandan" <dandan.bi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [Patch] MdeModulePkg DxeCore: Fix for missing MAT update
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 20:54:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e9663fa-7f62-d510-ae4a-389554a578e8@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A89E2EF3DFEDB4C8BFDE51014F606A14E4D28C7@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On 08/16/19 17:24, Gao, Liming wrote:
> Laszlo:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io] On Behalf Of
>> Laszlo Ersek
>> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 11:18 PM
>> To: Gao, Liming <liming.gao@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io; Kinney,
>> Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
>> Cc: Mike Turner <miketur@microsoft.com>; Wang, Jian J
>> <jian.j.wang@intel.com>; Wu, Hao A <hao.a.wu@intel.com>; Bi, Dandan
>> <dandan.bi@intel.com>
>> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [Patch] MdeModulePkg DxeCore: Fix for
>> missing MAT update
>>
>> On 08/14/19 17:55, Gao, Liming wrote:
>>
>>> If Platform PEIM doesn't build HOB, DxeIpl will not build HOB,
>>
>> My reading of the code is the opposite. If the platform PEIM does not
>> build the HOB, then the DXE IPL PEIM will attempt to build the HOB,
>> from the UEFI variable.
>>
>> At commit caa7d3a896f6, in file
>> "MdeModulePkg/Core/DxeIplPeim/DxeLoad.c", function DxeLoadCore(), we
>> have:
>>
>> 363 if (GetFirstGuidHob ((CONST EFI_GUID *)&gEfiMemoryTypeInformationGuid) == NULL) {
>> 364 //
>> 365 // Don't build GuidHob if GuidHob has been installed.
>> 366 //
>> 367 Status = PeiServicesLocatePpi (
>> 368 &gEfiPeiReadOnlyVariable2PpiGuid,
>> 369 0,
>> 370 NULL,
>> 371 (VOID **)&Variable
>> 372 );
>> 373 if (!EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>> 374 DataSize = sizeof (MemoryData);
>> 375 Status = Variable->GetVariable (
>> 376 Variable,
>> 377 EFI_MEMORY_TYPE_INFORMATION_VARIABLE_NAME,
>> 378 &gEfiMemoryTypeInformationGuid,
>> 379 NULL,
>> 380 &DataSize,
>> 381 &MemoryData
>> 382 );
>> 383 if (!EFI_ERROR (Status) && ValidateMemoryTypeInfoVariable(MemoryData, DataSize)) {
>
> Only when this variable exists, Hob will be built. But, if no PEIM
> builds Hob, BDS will not set the variable.
> So, there is still no HOB.
So how is a platform supposed to enable this feature?
If PlatformPei never builds the HOB, the variable will never be created,
so the DXE IPL PEIM will also not build the HOB, ever.
If PlatformPei builds the HOB with static data, then BDS will set
(update) the variable, yes, but the DXE IPL PEIM will ignore the
variable, because PlatformPei already built the HOB.
So... Is PlatformPei supposed to use the Variable PPI, check if the
variable exists, and create the static HOB only if the variable is
absent?
... Ugh, wait. I've actually implemented this for OVMF almost 2 years
ago! And the answer to my question is "yes":
https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/edk2-devel/2017-November/018312.html
See the OnReadOnlyVariable2Available() function:
+ //
+ // Check if the "MemoryTypeInformation" variable exists, in the
+ // gEfiMemoryTypeInformationGuid namespace.
+ //
+ ReadOnlyVariable2 = Ppi;
+ DataSize = 0;
+ Status = ReadOnlyVariable2->GetVariable (
+ ReadOnlyVariable2,
+ EFI_MEMORY_TYPE_INFORMATION_VARIABLE_NAME,
+ &gEfiMemoryTypeInformationGuid,
+ NULL,
+ &DataSize,
+ NULL
+ );
+ if (Status == EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL) {
+ //
+ // The variable exists; the DXE IPL PEIM will build the HOB from it.
+ //
+ return EFI_SUCCESS;
+ }
+ //
+ // Install the default memory type information HOB.
+ //
+ BuildMemTypeInfoHob ();
Apologies for forgetting about this; you are right.
Too bad my work for TianoCore#386 was rejected. :(
Thanks
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-16 18:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-10 14:10 [Patch] MdeModulePkg DxeCore: Fix for missing MAT update Liming Gao
2019-08-12 5:10 ` [edk2-devel] " Wang, Jian J
2019-08-12 16:24 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-08-12 23:22 ` Michael D Kinney
2019-08-13 9:47 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-08-14 14:00 ` Liming Gao
2019-08-14 15:12 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-08-14 15:55 ` Liming Gao
2019-08-16 15:18 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-08-16 15:24 ` Liming Gao
2019-08-16 18:54 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2019-08-19 0:40 ` Liming Gao
2019-08-21 8:46 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-08-21 14:14 ` Liming Gao
2019-08-22 11:56 ` Laszlo Ersek
2019-08-22 14:52 ` Liming Gao
2019-08-23 12:40 ` Laszlo Ersek
[not found] <15B9950E072DB087.17773@groups.io>
2019-08-10 14:16 ` Liming Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5e9663fa-7f62-d510-ae4a-389554a578e8@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox