From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.16831.1587305055062834035 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 07:04:15 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=pass (domain: arm.com, ip: 217.140.110.172, mailfrom: ard.biesheuvel@arm.com) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9CE30E; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 07:04:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.81] (unknown [172.31.20.19]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B1423F6CF; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 07:04:13 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platform][PATCH v1 0/4] Platform/RaspberryPi : Enable TFTP shell command To: Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud , "devel@edk2.groups.io" , Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud Cc: Leif Lindholm , Pete Batard , "Andrei Warkentin (awarkentin@vmware.com)" , nd References: <20200419130417.3298-1-samer@elhajmahmoud.com> <8d59e616-9910-4935-2e1f-5da75fc1d34a@arm.com> From: "Ard Biesheuvel" Message-ID: <5ec33d11-04f9-f1ea-7575-3f646d2653d1@arm.com> Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 16:04:12 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 4/19/20 4:00 PM, Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: devel@edk2.groups.io On Behalf Of Ard >> Biesheuvel via groups.io >> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 9:34 AM >> To: Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud ; >> devel@edk2.groups.io >> Cc: Leif Lindholm ; Pete Batard ; Andrei >> Warkentin (awarkentin@vmware.com) >> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [edk2-platform][PATCH v1 0/4] Platform/RaspberryPi >> : Enable TFTP shell command >> >> On 4/19/20 3:04 PM, Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud wrote: >>> Fix an ASSERT with the TFTP dynamic Shell command on the >>> RPi3 and RPi4 when running DEBUG builds. Also, enable the command by >>> default for all builds. >>> >> >> Fixing the ASSERT is fine but I am reluctant to enable this by default. >> It is a non-standard hack that ARM contributed in the past, and is not covered >> by the EFI of Shell specifications. If RPi4 is intended to be a showcase for UEFI >> on ARM done right, we should not enable this at all. >> > > That is OK. > > Are you fine just reviewing/pushing the PCD patches (and dropping the enable ones), or want me to send a new series without the enable patches ? > No that's fine, I'll just take the first two patches.