From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, jbrasen@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] uefi-sct/SctPkg: Correct issue with memory protection enabled.
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:59:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5fedff50-5a4b-e57a-055f-794d071eac86@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR12MB33408428FA3D46BECD089992CB3B0@DM6PR12MB3340.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>
On 09/23/20 00:13, Jeff Brasen wrote:
> Any comments on this change?
I suggest CC'ing the maintainers responsible for reviewing this change.
(I don't know who they are, unfortunately -- is there a Maintainers.txt
file in the uefi-sct tree?)
Thanks
Laszlo
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jeff
>
> ________________________________
> From: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 11:23 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io>
> Cc: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] uefi-sct/SctPkg: Correct issue with memory protection enabled.
>
> On systems with memory protection enabled the modification of local
> function initialization data results in permission issue. Make a copy of
> data prior to modification.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Brasen <jbrasen@nvidia.com>
> ---
> .../UnicodeCollationBBTestFunction.c | 38 ++++++++++---------
> .../UnicodeCollation2BBTestFunction.c | 38 ++++++++++---------
> 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/UnicodeCollation/BlackBoxTest/UnicodeCollationBBTestFunction.c b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/UnicodeCollation/BlackBoxTest/UnicodeCollationBBTestFunction.c
> index 6fa11e6c..e0b4c1d9 100644
> --- a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/UnicodeCollation/BlackBoxTest/UnicodeCollationBBTestFunction.c
> +++ b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/UnicodeCollation/BlackBoxTest/UnicodeCollationBBTestFunction.c
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Abstract:
> --*/
>
>
>
>
>
> -#include "SctLib.h"
> +#include "SctLib.h"
>
> #include "UnicodeCollationBBTestMain.h"
>
>
>
>
>
> @@ -337,6 +337,7 @@ BBTestStrLwrFunctionAutoTest (
> };
>
>
>
> CHAR16 TestDataSav[MAX_SIZE_OF_STRING + 1];
>
> + CHAR16 TestDataRw[MAX_SIZE_OF_STRING + 1];
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> @@ -368,14 +369,15 @@ BBTestStrLwrFunctionAutoTest (
> //
>
> // Backup current test data
>
> //
>
> + CopyUnicodeString (TestDataRw, TestData[Index]);
>
> CopyUnicodeString (TestDataSav, TestData[Index]);
>
>
>
> //
>
> // For each test data, test the StrLwr functionality.
>
> //
>
> - UnicodeCollation->StrLwr (UnicodeCollation, TestData[Index]);
>
> + UnicodeCollation->StrLwr (UnicodeCollation, TestDataRw);
>
>
>
> - if (CheckStrLwr (TestDataSav, TestData[Index])) {
>
> + if (CheckStrLwr (TestDataSav, TestDataRw)) {
>
> AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
>
> } else {
>
> AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
>
> @@ -390,15 +392,15 @@ BBTestStrLwrFunctionAutoTest (
> __FILE__,
>
> (UINTN)__LINE__,
>
> TestDataSav,
>
> - TestData[Index]
>
> + TestDataRw
>
> );
>
>
>
>
>
> - CopyUnicodeString (TestDataSav, TestData[Index]);
>
> - UnicodeCollation->StrUpr (UnicodeCollation, TestData[Index]);
>
> - UnicodeCollation->StrLwr (UnicodeCollation, TestData[Index]);
>
> + CopyUnicodeString (TestDataSav, TestDataRw);
>
> + UnicodeCollation->StrUpr (UnicodeCollation, TestDataRw);
>
> + UnicodeCollation->StrLwr (UnicodeCollation, TestDataRw);
>
>
>
> - if (CheckStrEql (TestDataSav, TestData[Index])) {
>
> + if (CheckStrEql (TestDataSav, TestDataRw)) {
>
> AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
>
> } else {
>
> AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
>
> @@ -413,7 +415,7 @@ BBTestStrLwrFunctionAutoTest (
> __FILE__,
>
> (UINTN)__LINE__,
>
> TestDataSav,
>
> - TestData[Index]
>
> + TestDataRw
>
> );
>
> };
>
>
>
> @@ -458,6 +460,7 @@ BBTestStrUprFunctionAutoTest (
> };
>
>
>
> CHAR16 TestDataSav[MAX_SIZE_OF_STRING + 1];
>
> + CHAR16 TestDataRw[MAX_SIZE_OF_STRING + 1];
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> @@ -490,13 +493,14 @@ BBTestStrUprFunctionAutoTest (
> // Backup current test data
>
> //
>
> CopyUnicodeString (TestDataSav, TestData[Index]);
>
> + CopyUnicodeString (TestDataRw, TestData[Index]);
>
>
>
> //
>
> // For each test data, test the StrUpr functionality.
>
> //
>
> - UnicodeCollation->StrUpr (UnicodeCollation, TestData[Index]);
>
> + UnicodeCollation->StrUpr (UnicodeCollation, TestDataRw);
>
>
>
> - if (CheckStrUpr (TestDataSav, TestData[Index])) {
>
> + if (CheckStrUpr (TestDataSav, TestDataRw)) {
>
> AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
>
> } else {
>
> AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
>
> @@ -511,14 +515,14 @@ BBTestStrUprFunctionAutoTest (
> __FILE__,
>
> (UINTN)__LINE__,
>
> TestDataSav,
>
> - TestData[Index]
>
> + TestDataRw
>
> );
>
>
>
> - CopyUnicodeString (TestDataSav, TestData[Index]);
>
> - UnicodeCollation->StrLwr (UnicodeCollation, TestData[Index]);
>
> - UnicodeCollation->StrUpr (UnicodeCollation, TestData[Index]);
>
> + CopyUnicodeString (TestDataSav, TestDataRw);
>
> + UnicodeCollation->StrLwr (UnicodeCollation, TestDataRw);
>
> + UnicodeCollation->StrUpr (UnicodeCollation, TestDataRw);
>
>
>
> - if (CheckStrEql (TestDataSav, TestData[Index])) {
>
> + if (CheckStrEql (TestDataSav, TestDataRw)) {
>
> AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
>
> } else {
>
> AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
>
> @@ -533,7 +537,7 @@ BBTestStrUprFunctionAutoTest (
> __FILE__,
>
> (UINTN)__LINE__,
>
> TestDataSav,
>
> - TestData[Index]
>
> + TestDataRw
>
> );
>
> };
>
>
>
> diff --git a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/UnicodeCollation2/BlackBoxTest/UnicodeCollation2BBTestFunction.c b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/UnicodeCollation2/BlackBoxTest/UnicodeCollation2BBTestFunction.c
> index 653b263a..19ff6764 100644
> --- a/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/UnicodeCollation2/BlackBoxTest/UnicodeCollation2BBTestFunction.c
> +++ b/uefi-sct/SctPkg/TestCase/UEFI/EFI/Protocol/UnicodeCollation2/BlackBoxTest/UnicodeCollation2BBTestFunction.c
> @@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ Abstract:
> --*/
>
>
>
>
>
> -#include "SctLib.h"
> +#include "SctLib.h"
>
> #include "UnicodeCollation2BBTestMain.h"
>
>
>
> STATIC CONST STRICOLL_TEST_DATA_FIELD mStriCollTestData[] ={
>
> @@ -335,6 +335,7 @@ BBTestStrLwrFunctionAutoTest (
> };
>
>
>
> CHAR16 TestDataSav[MAX_SIZE_OF_STRING + 1];
>
> + CHAR16 TestDataRw[MAX_SIZE_OF_STRING + 1];
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> @@ -367,13 +368,14 @@ BBTestStrLwrFunctionAutoTest (
> // Backup current test data
>
> //
>
> CopyUnicodeString (TestDataSav, TestData[Index]);
>
> + CopyUnicodeString (TestDataRw, TestData[Index]);
>
>
>
> //
>
> // For each test data, test the StrLwr functionality.
>
> //
>
> - UnicodeCollation->StrLwr (UnicodeCollation, TestData[Index]);
>
> + UnicodeCollation->StrLwr (UnicodeCollation, TestDataRw);
>
>
>
> - if (CheckStrLwr (TestDataSav, TestData[Index])) {
>
> + if (CheckStrLwr (TestDataSav, TestDataRw)) {
>
> AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
>
> } else {
>
> AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
>
> @@ -388,15 +390,15 @@ BBTestStrLwrFunctionAutoTest (
> __FILE__,
>
> (UINTN)__LINE__,
>
> TestDataSav,
>
> - TestData[Index]
>
> + TestDataRw
>
> );
>
>
>
>
>
> - CopyUnicodeString (TestDataSav, TestData[Index]);
>
> - UnicodeCollation->StrUpr (UnicodeCollation, TestData[Index]);
>
> - UnicodeCollation->StrLwr (UnicodeCollation, TestData[Index]);
>
> + CopyUnicodeString (TestDataSav, TestDataRw);
>
> + UnicodeCollation->StrUpr (UnicodeCollation, TestDataRw);
>
> + UnicodeCollation->StrLwr (UnicodeCollation, TestDataRw);
>
>
>
> - if (CheckStrEql (TestDataSav, TestData[Index])) {
>
> + if (CheckStrEql (TestDataSav, TestDataRw)) {
>
> AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
>
> } else {
>
> AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
>
> @@ -411,7 +413,7 @@ BBTestStrLwrFunctionAutoTest (
> __FILE__,
>
> (UINTN)__LINE__,
>
> TestDataSav,
>
> - TestData[Index]
>
> + TestDataRw
>
> );
>
> };
>
>
>
> @@ -456,6 +458,7 @@ BBTestStrUprFunctionAutoTest (
> };
>
>
>
> CHAR16 TestDataSav[MAX_SIZE_OF_STRING + 1];
>
> + CHAR16 TestDataRw[MAX_SIZE_OF_STRING + 1];
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> @@ -488,13 +491,14 @@ BBTestStrUprFunctionAutoTest (
> // Backup current test data
>
> //
>
> CopyUnicodeString (TestDataSav, TestData[Index]);
>
> + CopyUnicodeString (TestDataRw, TestData[Index]);
>
>
>
> //
>
> // For each test data, test the StrUpr functionality.
>
> //
>
> - UnicodeCollation->StrUpr (UnicodeCollation, TestData[Index]);
>
> + UnicodeCollation->StrUpr (UnicodeCollation, TestDataRw);
>
>
>
> - if (CheckStrUpr (TestDataSav, TestData[Index])) {
>
> + if (CheckStrUpr (TestDataSav, TestDataRw)) {
>
> AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
>
> } else {
>
> AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
>
> @@ -509,14 +513,14 @@ BBTestStrUprFunctionAutoTest (
> __FILE__,
>
> (UINTN)__LINE__,
>
> TestDataSav,
>
> - TestData[Index]
>
> + TestDataRw
>
> );
>
>
>
> - CopyUnicodeString (TestDataSav, TestData[Index]);
>
> - UnicodeCollation->StrLwr (UnicodeCollation, TestData[Index]);
>
> - UnicodeCollation->StrUpr (UnicodeCollation, TestData[Index]);
>
> + CopyUnicodeString (TestDataSav, TestDataRw);
>
> + UnicodeCollation->StrLwr (UnicodeCollation, TestDataRw);
>
> + UnicodeCollation->StrUpr (UnicodeCollation, TestDataRw);
>
>
>
> - if (CheckStrEql (TestDataSav, TestData[Index])) {
>
> + if (CheckStrEql (TestDataSav, TestDataRw)) {
>
> AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_PASSED;
>
> } else {
>
> AssertionType = EFI_TEST_ASSERTION_FAILED;
>
> @@ -531,7 +535,7 @@ BBTestStrUprFunctionAutoTest (
> __FILE__,
>
> (UINTN)__LINE__,
>
> TestDataSav,
>
> - TestData[Index]
>
> + TestDataRw
>
> );
>
> };
>
>
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-23 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-11 17:23 [PATCH] uefi-sct/SctPkg: Correct issue with memory protection enabled Jeff Brasen
2020-09-22 22:13 ` Jeff Brasen
2020-09-23 8:59 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2020-09-23 15:56 ` [edk2-devel] " Jeff Brasen
2020-09-29 14:05 ` Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud
2020-10-05 21:26 ` Jeff Brasen
2020-11-11 21:06 ` Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud
2020-11-24 18:42 ` G Edhaya Chandran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5fedff50-5a4b-e57a-055f-794d071eac86@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox