Re: [PATCH 2/7] ovmf: link with Tcg2ConfigPei module

[Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>]

On 03/01/18 15:59, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 6:31 PM, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:

>> (6) Now, I realize Tcg2Pei *apparently* depends on
>> gEfiPeiReadOnlyVariable2PpiGuid (i.e., read-only variable access in the
>> PEI phase) as well. That's a bug in the INF file (the [depex] section).
>> If you grep the Tcg2Pei module source for the GUID, the [depex] section
>> is the only hit. Can you please submit a separate patch that removes it
>> from the depex?
> 
> I don't get how you came to that conclusion, both
> SecurityPkg/Tcg/Tcg2Config/Tcg2ConfigPeim.c and
> SecurityPkg/Tcg/Tcg2Config/TpmDetection.c match. Apparently, the
> variable is used in s3 mode, in DetectTpmDevice().

In my point (6) above, I was  talking about Tcg2Pei, not Tcg2ConfigPei.

If you grep "SecurityPkg/Tcg/Tcg2Pei" for
"gEfiPeiReadOnlyVariable2PpiGuid", the only hit is the depex section in
the INF file.

I think that's a bug in "SecurityPkg/Tcg/Tcg2Pei/Tcg2Pei.inf", and the
PPI GUID should removed from there, as a separate patch.

>>> ---
>>>  OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.dsc | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  OvmfPkg/OvmfPkgX64.fdf |  3 +++
>>>  2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>
>> Is there any particular reason to exclude the Ia32 and Ia32X64 builds?
>>
>> If not, then please modify all three sets of dsc/fdf files identically.
> 
> I'd rather keep this as a TODO item for now, since we are not close to
> a final version, and it's annoying to have to fix each files etc..

OK.

Thanks!
Laszlo