From: "Laszlo Ersek" <lersek@redhat.com>
To: devel@edk2.groups.io, ardb@kernel.org
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>,
Oliver Steffen <osteffen@redhat.com>,
Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>,
Oliver Smith-Denny <osde@linux.microsoft.com>,
Taylor Beebe <taylor.d.beebe@gmail.com>,
Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
Leif Lindholm <quic_llindhol@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] ArmVirt: Allow memory attributes protocol to be disabled on first boot
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 15:49:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <606aadcb-1ed1-e486-5ec5-04c7d9930251@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e565e3c1-62c6-08f6-f268-6b1fa496cf16@redhat.com>
On 12/8/23 15:34, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> (7) Tying back to my point (4) -- I understand this is a hack anyway,
> but I'm still uncomfortable with platform BDS uninstalling a protocol
> that is owned by / provided by the CPU driver. Feels like a significant
> layering violation.
>
> Can we modify the CPU driver instead, to listen to a new event group,
> upon which being signaled, the CPU driver would uninstall the protocol
> (and close the listening event)?
>
> This PlatformBootManagerLib instance would act more or less the same
> (I'd suggest signaling the event group from within AfterConsole, in case
> the PCD default and/or the fw_cfg knob dictated that), but the protocol
> uninstallation would occur in "ArmPkg/Drivers/CpuDxe".
>
> In more technical terms, the layering violation IMO is that we mess with
> CpuDxe's "mCpuHandle" and "mMemoryAttribute" static variables from
> within BDS. Adding the new event group requires more boiler-plate code
> for sure, but there's a small code-size benefit as well: we'd not have
> to look up either the handle (with LocateHandle) or the protocol
> interface (with HandleProtocol), as CpuDxe inherently knows those
> (mCpuHandle, mMemoryAttribute).
Or maybe avoid modifying PlatformBootManagerLib completely; instead,
move the logic into CpuDxe, into a ready-to-boot event handler?
At that time, variable services should be available to CpuDxe as well
(for the BootOrder UEFI var check).
Laszlo
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#112234): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/112234
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/103031504/7686176
Group Owner: devel+owner@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/leave/12367111/7686176/1913456212/xyzzy [rebecca@openfw.io]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-08 14:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-07 10:06 [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] ArmVirt: Allow memory attributes protocol to be disabled on first boot Ard Biesheuvel
2023-12-08 11:20 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-12-11 0:02 ` Alexander Graf via groups.io
2023-12-08 14:34 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-12-08 14:49 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2023-12-08 15:34 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-12-11 14:27 ` Laszlo Ersek
2023-12-11 9:05 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2023-12-11 9:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2023-12-11 9:59 ` Gerd Hoffmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=606aadcb-1ed1-e486-5ec5-04c7d9930251@redhat.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox