From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com (out02.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.232]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.963.1596304972112432767 for ; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 11:02:52 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@bsdio.com header.s=xmission header.b=UoF/GgC4; spf=none, err=SPF record not found (domain: bsdio.com, ip: 166.70.13.232, mailfrom: rebecca@bsdio.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=simple/simple; d=bsdio.com; s=xmission; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID :Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe :List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Jf6bPb5pcJUwHcZHY2oEhfVctWn1q71GU3pYNbNpJ8U=; b=UoF/GgC4S4VsG7yf928BD+O+Tj YbR54wTXVqLfeIRpQAm+P3cO2j0iOSCRYtPt4WcjHktA6s4OUwSy0O+8dOVtsfiagIwisXDdSX5W8 0daHg4QpdgUOfeWK7jAxvLo0C0bvwFjbs/BN1J2SoJLrZlN3XnKOqzeqdF5WnWev4SVI=; Received: from in01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.51]) by out02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1k1vqL-005mbu-Kw; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 12:02:49 -0600 Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.67]) by in01.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1k1vqK-0008B2-D3; Sat, 01 Aug 2020 12:02:49 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30BD7161F7E; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 12:02:48 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta3.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta3.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta3.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id Qqx7fuY9VnbV; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 12:02:48 -0600 (MDT) Received: from [10.0.10.120] (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) (Authenticated sender: rebecca@bsdio.com) by mta3.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E0087161E99; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 12:02:47 -0600 (MDT) To: Laszlo Ersek , edk2-devel-groups-io Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Jordan Justen , =?UTF-8?Q?Philippe_Mathieu-Daud=c3=a9?= , Sean Brogan References: <20200801155024.16439-1-lersek@redhat.com> From: "Rebecca Cran" Message-ID: <620e361c-b790-315f-487f-898ca88bf539@bsdio.com> Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 12:02:47 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200801155024.16439-1-lersek@redhat.com> X-XM-SPF: eid=1k1vqK-0008B2-D3;;;mid=<620e361c-b790-315f-487f-898ca88bf539@bsdio.com>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.13.67;;;frm=rebecca@bsdio.com;;;spf=none X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.67 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa05.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,NICE_REPLY_A,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,TooManyTo_001, XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5004] * 0.3 TooManyTo_001 Multiple "To" Header Recipients 2x (uncommon) * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa05 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * -0.8 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) X-Spam-DCC: ; sa05 0; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Laszlo Ersek , edk2-devel-groups-io X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 634 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.12 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 14 (2.2%), b_tie_ro: 12 (1.8%), parse: 2.2 (0.3%), extract_message_metadata: 21 (3.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.75 (0.3%), tests_pri_-1000: 20 (3.1%), tests_pri_-950: 1.60 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 1.32 (0.2%), tests_pri_-90: 93 (14.7%), check_bayes: 88 (13.9%), b_tokenize: 7 (1.2%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (0.9%), b_comp_prob: 2.4 (0.4%), b_tok_touch_all: 69 (10.8%), b_finish: 1.22 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 467 (73.7%), check_dkim_signature: 0.88 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 46 (7.2%), poll_dns_idle: 41 (6.5%), tests_pri_10: 2.2 (0.3%), tests_pri_500: 7 (1.2%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH] OvmfPkg: fix DEC spec violation introduced by Bhyve addition X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US On 8/1/20 9:50 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > - Repo: https://github.com/lersek/edk2.git > Branch: bhyve_dec_fix > > - Personal CI build: https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/846 > > - Because the DEC spec violation is breaking CI, I'm going to push this > as soon as Rebecca (and hopefully Sean) confirm the change is OK. > > - Rebecca, please account for the movements / renames in the present > patch in your upcoming patch for "Maintainers.txt". Thanks! Reviewed-by: Rebecca Cran Thanks! And sorry for the disruption. -- Rebecca Cran