From: "Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@arm.com>
To: Pete Batard <pete@akeo.ie>,
Andrei Warkentin <andrey.warkentin@gmail.com>,
devel@edk2.groups.io
Cc: leif@nuviainc.com, philmd@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [edk2-platforms][PATCH 1/2] RPi: rip out FdtDxe logic to use internal DTB
Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 17:13:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <621362ba-ab8d-9acf-5a02-74b9e7ca80af@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4538b8ec-dc41-ec16-2ef5-011be3e90849@akeo.ie>
On 5/1/20 5:11 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
> On 2020.05.01 14:19, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 4/30/20 11:16 PM, Andrei Warkentin wrote:
>>> Initially, FdtDxe used an internal (embedded in UEFI) FDT,
>>> because it was neither understood how to consume the
>>> one loaded by the VideoCore firmware, nor understood just
>>> how important it is to use the DTB provided by config.txt.
>>>
>>> Embedding the DT was a bad idea, because:
>>> - Permanently stale
>>> - No overlays
>>>
>>> Also, on devices like the Pi 4 you _have_ to have a DT
>>> around for the start4 VPU firmware to pick up, otherwise
>>> the board is left in an inconsistent state. So we're being
>>> proscriptive now about DT use with config.txt, which means
>>> this internal DT logic is deadc code.
>>>
>>> Further FdtDxe cleanups are possible and will be handled
>>> separately, specifically:
>>> - probably no need to use a separate allocation for patched DT
>>> (optimize memory used)
>>> - suspicious use of EfiBootServicesData (I filed
>>> https://github.com/ARM-software/ebbr/issues/45 to sort out the real
>>> requirements)
>>>
>>> Testing: Booted Ubuntu 18.04 on Pi 2B (1.2).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Andrei Warkentin <andrey.warkentin@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> Platform/RaspberryPi/Drivers/FdtDxe/FdtDxe.c | 206
>>> ++++----------------
>>> Platform/RaspberryPi/Drivers/FdtDxe/FdtDxe.inf | 4 -
>>> Platform/RaspberryPi/RPi3/RPi3.fdf | 11 --
>>> Platform/RaspberryPi/RPi4/RPi4.fdf | 8 -
>>> Platform/RaspberryPi/RaspberryPi.dec | 7 -
>>> 5 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 198 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Platform/RaspberryPi/Drivers/FdtDxe/FdtDxe.c
>>> b/Platform/RaspberryPi/Drivers/FdtDxe/FdtDxe.c
>>> index e7143f57..187b9566 100644
>>> --- a/Platform/RaspberryPi/Drivers/FdtDxe/FdtDxe.c
>>> +++ b/Platform/RaspberryPi/Drivers/FdtDxe/FdtDxe.c
>>> @@ -335,90 +335,6 @@ CleanSimpleFramebuffer (
>>> return EFI_SUCCESS;
>>> }
>>> -#define MAX_CMDLINE_SIZE 512
>>> -
>>> -STATIC
>>> -EFI_STATUS
>>> -UpdateBootArgs (
>>> - VOID
>>> - )
>>> -{
>>> - INTN Node;
>>> - INTN Retval;
>>> - EFI_STATUS Status;
>>> - CHAR8 *CommandLine;
>>> -
>>> - //
>>> - // Locate the /chosen node
>>> - //
>>> - Node = fdt_path_offset (mFdtImage, "/chosen");
>>> - if (Node < 0) {
>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: failed to locate /chosen node\n",
>>> __FUNCTION__));
>>> - return EFI_NOT_FOUND;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - //
>>> - // If /chosen/bootargs already exists, we want to add a space
>>> character
>>> - // before adding the firmware supplied arguments. However, the
>>> RpiFirmware
>>> - // protocol expects a 32-bit aligned buffer. So let's allocate 4
>>> bytes of
>>> - // slack, and skip the first 3 when passing this buffer into libfdt.
>>> - //
>>> - CommandLine = AllocatePool (MAX_CMDLINE_SIZE) + 4;
>>> - if (!CommandLine) {
>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: failed to allocate memory\n",
>>> __FUNCTION__));
>>> - return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - //
>>> - // Get the command line from the firmware
>>> - //
>>> - Status = mFwProtocol->GetCommandLine (MAX_CMDLINE_SIZE,
>>> CommandLine + 4);
>>> - if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: failed to retrieve command line\n",
>>> __FUNCTION__));
>>> - return Status;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - if (AsciiStrLen (CommandLine + 4) == 0) {
>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%a: empty command line received\n",
>>> __FUNCTION__));
>>> - return EFI_SUCCESS;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - CommandLine[3] = ' ';
>>> -
>>> - Retval = fdt_appendprop_string (mFdtImage, Node, "bootargs",
>>> &CommandLine[3]);
>>> - if (Retval != 0) {
>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: failed to set /chosen/bootargs
>>> property (%d)\n",
>>> - __FUNCTION__, Retval));
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - DEBUG_CODE_BEGIN ();
>>> - CONST CHAR8 *Prop;
>>> - INT32 Length;
>>> - INT32 Index;
>>> -
>>> - Node = fdt_path_offset (mFdtImage, "/chosen");
>>> - ASSERT (Node >= 0);
>>> -
>>> - Prop = fdt_getprop (mFdtImage, Node, "bootargs", &Length);
>>> - ASSERT (Prop != NULL);
>>> -
>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "Command line set from firmware (length
>>> %d):\n'", Length));
>>> -
>>> - for (Index = 0; Index < Length; Index++, Prop++) {
>>> - if (*Prop == '\0') {
>>> - continue;
>>> - }
>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "%c", *Prop));
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "'\n"));
>>> - DEBUG_CODE_END ();
>>> -
>>> - FreePool (CommandLine - 4);
>>> - return EFI_SUCCESS;
>>> -}
>>> -
>>> -
>>> /**
>>> @param ImageHandle of the loaded driver
>>> @param SystemTable Pointer to the System Table
>>> @@ -435,13 +351,10 @@ FdtDxeInitialize (
>>> IN EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE *SystemTable
>>> )
>>> {
>>> + INT32 Retval;
>>> EFI_STATUS Status;
>>> - EFI_GUID *FdtGuid;
>>> - VOID *FdtImage;
>>> UINTN FdtSize;
>>> - INT32 Retval;
>>> - UINT32 BoardRevision;
>>> - BOOLEAN Internal;
>>> + VOID *FdtImage = NULL;
>>> if (PcdGet32 (PcdOptDeviceTree) == 0) {
>>> DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "Device Tree disabled per user
>>> configuration\n"));
>>> @@ -450,77 +363,28 @@ FdtDxeInitialize (
>>> Status = gBS->LocateProtocol (&gRaspberryPiFirmwareProtocolGuid,
>>> NULL,
>>> (VOID**)&mFwProtocol);
>>> - ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
>>> + if (mFwProtocol == NULL) {
>>> + /*
>>> + * Impossible because of the depex...
>>> + */
>>> + ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
>>> + return EFI_NOT_FOUND;
>>> + }
>>
>> Do we need this change?
>
> Looking at what we are doing elsewhere, I thing we should go with:
>
> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
> return Status;
> }
>
> The ASSERT_EFI_ERROR () on its own was not enough for RELEASE, so we
> definitely want to return an error code here if needed, and I guess
> that, technically, we could consider that LocateProtocol () may succeed
> and return a NULL value for mFwProtocol, but I doubt that's a valid
> consideration.
>
But the DEPEX guarantees that the module will only be dispatched at a
time when LocateProtocol() will succeed. This is a common pattern, so I
wonder why it is being silently modified here.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-01 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-30 21:16 [edk2-platforms][PATCH 0/2] Rip out "internal DTB" support in FdtDxe Andrei Warkentin
2020-04-30 21:16 ` [edk2-platforms][PATCH 1/2] RPi: rip out FdtDxe logic to use internal DTB Andrei Warkentin
2020-05-01 10:45 ` Pete Batard
2020-05-01 13:19 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-05-01 15:11 ` Pete Batard
2020-05-01 15:13 ` Ard Biesheuvel [this message]
2020-05-01 15:16 ` Pete Batard
2020-05-01 16:56 ` [edk2-devel] " Andrei Warkentin
2020-05-01 17:04 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-04-30 21:16 ` [edk2-platforms][PATCH 2/2] RPi: remove any mention of an "internal DTB" Andrei Warkentin
2020-05-01 10:47 ` Pete Batard
2020-05-01 17:08 ` [edk2-platforms][PATCH 0/2] Rip out "internal DTB" support in FdtDxe Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-list from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=621362ba-ab8d-9acf-5a02-74b9e7ca80af@arm.com \
--to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox