public inbox for devel@edk2.groups.io
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Daniel Schaefer" <daniel.schaefer@hpe.com>
To: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>, <devel@edk2.groups.io>
Cc: Abner Chang <abner.chang@hpe.com>,
	Gilbert Chen <gilbert.chen@hpe.com>,
	Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@nuviainc.com>,
	Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [platform/devel-riscvplatforms PATCHv1 2/2] ProcessorPkg/Library: Add EDK2 RISC-V OpenSBI library.
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 15:38:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <63782f55-7bab-f97c-8e2a-257c6e9b9498@hpe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200511231719.GW21486@vanye>

On 5/12/20 1:17 AM, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 19:20:15 +0200, Daniel Schaefer wrote:
>> EDK2 RISC-V OpenSBI library which pull in external source files under
>> RISC-V/ProcessorPkg/Library/RiscVOpensbiLib/opensbi to the build process.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Schaefer <daniel.schaefer@hpe.com>
>> Co-authored-by: Abner Chang <abner.chang@hpe.com>
>> Co-authored-by: Gilbert Chen <gilbert.chen@hpe.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Leif Lindholm <leif@nuviainc.com>
>>
>> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@nuviainc.com>
>> Cc: Gilbert Chen <gilbert.chen@hpe.com>
>> Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   Silicon/RISC-V/ProcessorPkg/Library/RiscVOpensbiLib/RiscVOpensbiLib.inf | 60 +++++++++++++++
>>   Silicon/RISC-V/ProcessorPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/RiscVOpensbi.h     | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>   Silicon/RISC-V/ProcessorPkg/Include/OpensbiTypes.h                      | 66 ++++++++++++++++
>>   3 files changed, 205 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Silicon/RISC-V/ProcessorPkg/Library/RiscVOpensbiLib/RiscVOpensbiLib.inf b/Silicon/RISC-V/ProcessorPkg/Library/RiscVOpensbiLib/RiscVOpensbiLib.inf
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..59dbd67d8e03
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Silicon/RISC-V/ProcessorPkg/Library/RiscVOpensbiLib/RiscVOpensbiLib.inf
>> @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
>> +## @file
>> +# RISC-V Opensbi Library Instance.
>> +#
>> +#  Copyright (c) 2020, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP. All rights reserved.<BR>
>> +#
>> +#  SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
>> +#
>> +##
>> +
>> +[Defines]
>> +  INF_VERSION    = 0x0001001b
>> +  BASE_NAME      = RiscVOpensbiLib
>> +  FILE_GUID      = 6EF0C812-66F6-11E9-93CE-3F5D5F0DF0A7
>> +  MODULE_TYPE    = BASE
>> +  VERSION_STRING = 1.0
>> +  LIBRARY_CLASS  = RiscVOpensbiLib
>> +
>> +[Sources]
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/riscv_asm.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/riscv_atomic.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/riscv_hardfp.S
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/riscv_locks.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/sbi_console.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/sbi_ecall.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/sbi_ecall_vendor.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/sbi_ecall_replace.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/sbi_ecall_legacy.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/sbi_ecall_base.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/sbi_emulate_csr.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/sbi_fifo.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/sbi_hart.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/sbi_hfence.S
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/sbi_illegal_insn.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/sbi_init.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/sbi_ipi.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/sbi_misaligned_ldst.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/sbi_scratch.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/sbi_string.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/sbi_system.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/sbi_timer.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/sbi_tlb.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/sbi_trap.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/sbi/sbi_unpriv.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/utils/sys/clint.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/utils/irqchip/plic.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/utils/serial/sifive-uart.c
>> +  opensbi/lib/utils/serial/uart8250.c
>> +
>> +[Packages]
>> +  EmbeddedPkg/EmbeddedPkg.dec   # For libfdt.
>> +  MdePkg/MdePkg.dec
>> +  Silicon/RISC-V/ProcessorPkg/RiscVProcessorPkg.dec
>> +
>> +[LibraryClasses]
>> +  BaseLib
>> +  PcdLib
>    > +  RiscVCpuLib

Did you want to leave a comment here?
It does seem like this Lib is not needed. Why did you add it, Abner?
Is PcdLib necessary?

>> +
>> +
>> +
>> diff --git a/Silicon/RISC-V/ProcessorPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/RiscVOpensbi.h b/Silicon/RISC-V/ProcessorPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/RiscVOpensbi.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..c5c0bd6d9b01
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Silicon/RISC-V/ProcessorPkg/Include/IndustryStandard/RiscVOpensbi.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
>> +/** @file
>> +  SBI inline function calls.
>> +
>> +  Copyright (c) 2020, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP. All rights reserved.<BR>
>> +
>> +  SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
>> +
>> +**/
>> +
>> +#ifndef EDK2_SBI_H_
>> +#define EDK2_SBI_H_
>> +
>> +#include <include/sbi/riscv_asm.h> // Reference to header file in opensbi
>> +#include <RiscVImpl.h>
>> +#include <sbi/sbi_types.h>  // Reference to header file wrapper
>> +
>> +#define SBI_SUCCESS                    0
>> +#define SBI_ERR_FAILED                -1
>> +#define SBI_ERR_NOT_SUPPORTED         -2
>> +#define SBI_ERR_INVALID_PARAM         -3
>> +#define SBI_ERR_DENIED                -4
>> +#define SBI_ERR_INVALID_ADDRESS       -5
>> +#define SBI_ERR_ALREADY_AVAILABLE     -6
>
> These #defines are translations of what exists in
> opensbi/include/sbi/sbi_error.h - can we use the definitions there
> directly (redefining them here)?
Yes, you're right. One is improperly defined in OpenSBI but I'll use the 
other ones here.
>
>> +
>> +#define SBI_BASE_EXT                   0x10
>> +#define SBI_HSM_EXT                    0x48534D
>> +#define SBI_TIME_EXT                   0x54494D45
>> +#define SBI_IPI_EXT                    0x735049
>> +#define SBI_RFNC_EXT                   0x52464E43
>> +
>> +//
>> +// Below two definitions should be defined in OpenSBI.
>> +//
>> +#define SBI_EXT_FIRMWARE_CODE_BASE_START 0x0A000000
>> +#define SBI_EXT_FIRMWARE_CODE_BASE_END   0x0AFFFFFF
>> +
>> +#define SBI_GET_SPEC_VERSION_FUNC      0
>> +#define SBI_GET_IMPL_ID_FUNC           1
>> +#define SBI_GET_IMPL_VERSION_FUNC      2
>> +#define SBI_PROBE_EXTENSION_FUNC       3
>> +#define SBI_GET_MVENDORID_FUNC         4
>> +#define SBI_GET_MARCHID_FUNC           5
>> +#define SBI_GET_MIMPID_FUNC            6
>> +
>> +#define SBI_HART_START_FUNC            0
>> +#define SBI_HART_STOP_FUNC             1
>> +#define SBI_HART_GET_STATUS_FUNC       2
>> +
>> +#define RISC_V_MAX_HART_SUPPORTED 16
>> +
>> +typedef
>> +VOID
>> +(EFIAPI *RISCV_HART_SWITCH_MODE)(
>> +  IN  UINTN   FuncArg0,
>> +  IN  UINTN   FuncArg1,
>> +  IN  UINTN   NextAddr,
>> +  IN  UINTN   NextMode,
>> +  IN  BOOLEAN NextVirt
>> +  );
>> +
>> +//
>> +// Keep the structure member in 64-bit alignment.
>> +//
>> +typedef struct {
>> +    UINT64                 IsaExtensionSupported;  // The ISA extension this core supported.
>> +    RISCV_UINT128          MachineVendorId;        // Machine vendor ID
>> +    RISCV_UINT128          MachineArchId;          // Machine Architecture ID
>> +    RISCV_UINT128          MachineImplId;          // Machine Implementation ID
>> +    RISCV_HART_SWITCH_MODE HartSwitchMode;         // OpenSBI's function to switch the mode of a hart
>> +} EFI_RISCV_FIRMWARE_CONTEXT_HART_SPECIFIC;
>> +#define FIRMWARE_CONTEXT_HART_SPECIFIC_SIZE  (64 * 8) // This is the size of EFI_RISCV_FIRMWARE_CONTEXT_HART_SPECIFIC
>> +                                                      // structure. Referred by both C code and assembly code.
>> +
>> +typedef struct {
>> +  VOID            *PeiServiceTable;       // PEI Service table
>> +  EFI_RISCV_FIRMWARE_CONTEXT_HART_SPECIFIC  *HartSpecific[RISC_V_MAX_HART_SUPPORTED];
>> +} EFI_RISCV_OPENSBI_FIRMWARE_CONTEXT;
>> +
>> +#endif
>> diff --git a/Silicon/RISC-V/ProcessorPkg/Include/OpensbiTypes.h b/Silicon/RISC-V/ProcessorPkg/Include/OpensbiTypes.h
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..3964bf00ea88
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Silicon/RISC-V/ProcessorPkg/Include/OpensbiTypes.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
>> +/** @file
>> +  RISC-V OpesbSBI header file reference.
>> +
>> +  Copyright (c) 2020, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Development LP. All rights reserved.<BR>
>> +
>> +  SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-2-Clause-Patent
>> +
>> +**/
>> +#ifndef EDK2_SBI_TYPES_H_
>> +#define EDK2_SBI_TYPES_H_
>> +
> I think this header needs to include either Base.h or ProcessorBind.h?
>
> I am also somewhat confused by this file existing both here and in
> edk2-staging RISC-V-V2. Am I on the wrong timeline?

Yes, that's a good idea. I'll include Base.h

We have abandoned the branch RISC-V-V2 on edk2-staging. Like mentioned 
in the cover letter,
we only merged the bare minimum to edk2 and will include all of the 
remaining code in edk2-platforms.
Thus this file will only remain here.

>
>> +typedef INT8    s8;
>> +typedef UINT8   u8;
>> +typedef UINT8   uint8_t;
>> +
>> +typedef INT16   s16;
>> +typedef UINT16  u16;
>> +typedef INT16   int16_t;
>> +typedef UINT16  uint16_t;
>> +
>> +typedef INT32   s32;
>> +typedef UINT32  u32;
>> +typedef INT32   int32_t;
>> +typedef UINT32  uint32_t;
>> +
>> +typedef INT64   s64;
>> +typedef UINT64  u64;
>> +typedef INT64   int64_t;
>> +typedef UINT64  uint64_t;
>> +
>> +#define PRILX   "016lx"
> Please add a comment about what PRILX is for, given this isn't
> something I can even grep for in this repo. Maybe consider also moving
> it after all the typedefs, so it isn't as undexpected?
Yes, we don't use it currently but we need to define it, because in the 
OpenSBI header
it's guarded by #ifndef OPENSBI_EXTERNAL_SBI_TYPES, which we define to 
override
their types.
>
>> +
>> +typedef BOOLEAN  bool;
>> +typedef unsigned long   ulong;
>> +typedef UINT64   uintptr_t;
>> +typedef UINT64   size_t;
>> +typedef INT64    ssize_t;
>> +typedef UINT64   virtual_addr_t;
>> +typedef UINT64   virtual_size_t;
>> +typedef UINT64   physical_addr_t;
>> +typedef UINT64   physical_size_t;
>> +
>> +#define __packed        __attribute__((packed))
>> +#define __noreturn      __attribute__((noreturn))
>> +
>> +#define likely(x) __builtin_expect((x), 1)
>> +#define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect((x), 0)
> It may be premature to start worrying about support in non-gcc-like
> toolchains, but if that *does* happen, it might be nicer if it fails
> with a clear error message about "unsupported toolchain" (Base.h uses
>    #if defined(__GNUC__) || defined(__clang__)
> ).
Good catch!
However it seems that both GCC and Clang support this builtin
>
> /
>      Leif
Thanks for the review. I'll send an updated patch.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-15 13:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-11 17:20 [platform/devel-riscvplatforms PATCHv1 0/2] New RISC-V patches Daniel Schaefer
2020-05-11 17:20 ` [platform/devel-riscvplatforms PATCHv1 1/2] ProcessorPkg/RiscVOpensbLlib: Add submodule opensbi Daniel Schaefer
2020-05-11 17:20 ` [platform/devel-riscvplatforms PATCHv1 2/2] ProcessorPkg/Library: Add EDK2 RISC-V OpenSBI library Daniel Schaefer
2020-05-11 23:17   ` [edk2-devel] " Leif Lindholm
2020-05-15 13:38     ` Daniel Schaefer [this message]
2020-05-11 17:38 ` [platform/devel-riscvplatforms PATCHv1 0/2] New RISC-V patches Leif Lindholm
2020-05-12  0:38   ` Abner Chang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-list from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=63782f55-7bab-f97c-8e2a-257c6e9b9498@hpe.com \
    --to=devel@edk2.groups.io \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox