Re: [edk2-wiki PATCH] release planning: Add "SMBIOS 3.2.0 support" in Proposed Features

[Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>]

On 08/24/18 03:18, Zeng, Star wrote:
> I tried both at https://github.com/lzeng14/tianocore/wiki/EDK-II-Release-Planning.

Thanks!

> In fact, I am ok with either one. :)

I like the version more where the URL is not human-readable (in the
rendered article). If we introduce, say, 5 features until the next
stable tag, those URLs will get pretty tiresome to look at.

For the version that's currently visible in your clone:

Acked-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>

Thanks!
Laszlo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:lersek@redhat.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2018 7:20 PM
> To: Zeng, Star <star.zeng@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Kinney, Michael D <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>; Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>; Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>; Bi, Dandan <dandan.bi@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-wiki PATCH] release planning: Add "SMBIOS 3.2.0 support" in Proposed Features
> 
> On 08/23/18 08:40, Star Zeng wrote:
>> Cc: Michael D Kinney <michael.d.kinney@intel.com>
>> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Andrew Fish <afish@apple.com>
>> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Dandan Bi <dandan.bi@intel.com>
>> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
>> Signed-off-by: Star Zeng <star.zeng@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  EDK-II-Release-Planning.md | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/EDK-II-Release-Planning.md b/EDK-II-Release-Planning.md 
>> index 744770521cca..f2afde72796f 100644
>> --- a/EDK-II-Release-Planning.md
>> +++ b/EDK-II-Release-Planning.md
>> @@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
>>  
>>  ## Proposed Features
>>  
>> +* SMBIOS 3.2.0 support: 
>> +https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1099
>> +
>>  TBD Bugzilla List
>>  
>>  ---
>>
> 
> If you insert
> 
>   [SMBIOS 3.2.0 support](https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1099)
> 
> instead, do you like the rendered view better?
> 
> (If you don't, then I'm fine with this patch too, of course.)
> 
> Thanks!
> Laszlo
>